501

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

rofl, nolio u always been jealous of me, I always assumed it was because we smashed your fams 10x over the yrs and u always delete claiming we never beat your n00b ass.

Have I been a player maker the past few yrs? except for 1 round or so probably not. However my 1st 6 yrs or so in ic i very much was and big time. There was a time where I was the leader/main attacker and everything else. Then I slowed down an just became leader/banker then slowed down and kagar started leading and I was banker/fam organizer and everyone who played with us back then will tell u the fam revolved around Kagar and I. Kagar was good attacker, but he dident know what I did for organizing fams and strats as I did back then.

U can argue it or not, but I started the fam bank, I perfected cf/to banking and perfected starting cf/rc banking and switching over to lq/to when it was still effective+ I perfected and made popular going with the fam using all camaars for attackers and custom bankers with alot of opps while others were still useing revelons and custom attackers. I was always called a n00b back then for going custom banker with opps and always called a n00b for going cf/to banking while cf/resource banking was " supposedly the best according to wad yrs ago". I did win best stratagest and alot of changes that happened to ic over the past 2.5 yrs were alot of my ideas I tried convincing the mods over the yrs, but till the newer mods came they wouldnt do them. Before I retired the last time I had the most wins overall+ Before they started all these new gals and everythign I was the only 1 to win all the old gals atleast once. Mw/andro/tri/sd/pw and were not talking with 200 player either, back in the day evan pw had 900 players.

When I was an attacker I was told I was nothing without the bankers in my fam ( I always got them to top 5, so people thought they rocked) then when i slowed down and became a banker i was always told i was nothing without my attackers( and most famously later i was told I was nothing without kagar attacking and visa versa he was told he was nothing without me, so it depended on who was mad at us at the time;P).

The only other strats that were copied more then mine was Flint strat which wasnt invented by flint at all and was only used for 3 rounds or so. ALl my old strats were used by players and it was obvious each round when people started out. Lets not forget how iron was 30+ 2 rounds ago and I was going cf start just to prove a point of how much better it is when done right and we still were #1 in nw by a good amount till our 1st war+ we were minus 4 players due to christmas holidays

Do I care? lol nope, Nolio is just a jealous/envious little rat. I thought he was a decent mod, he had a head on him, we all knew he abused his powers and did things he wasent suppose to:) Maybe 1 day nolio will get his dream and win a gal:P.

Again I dont care, i dont post this stuff in my sig or anything and I dident play this round to stay past this week( started a new job), I would of liked to have donated alot of good planets to these guys and left them in good shape. I dident lead, i dident evan communicate with them much, Heck Nai was maken cf's for me early on and sitting on them for 3 days with -30 income cause he dident know Id be gone for 3 days lol.

I seen people force people to do fam bank when they dont want to, I seen people including WS do it wrong and do it like a prick forcing people to do it his way. If he wasent allied to us capri r2 he would fo been raped so hard, they were 12th and everyone in fam couldnt stand to be there. They raped small fams all round and Heck our eor war all they did was jump to raid bankers while we had to fight the attackers lol, but this is the guy that calims greatness today.

We played no naps early on and clear or be cleared, if u were small and asked for a nap then u got 1. we didnt go 3-8 camaar ticsk to take 120 planets from a fam 1/4th our nw at 23rd rank and with few naps spreading out for spread we were always fighting alot of fams.

There will always be people saying we raped small fams, but we didnt, if u were dead last and shared+ in our attackers nw then u got cleared, however if u asked for a nap u got 1 for free unless u were top 15 which before top 15 use to be something.

In anycase good day, when i came back again 4 rounds ago ic had renewed promise, I think it lost its last chance to recover, this time its stefans and the players fault and not the mods, the mods have tried

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

HEY, this looks like three years ago. PP writing love books

[color=cyan][u] [i]Fremen Forever

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

Why would someone want to read PP's posts...Honestly

Death is but a myth to those who do not fear it, but to you, death is inevitable

504

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

if he would cut it down to 2 or maybe 3 words we would read it tongue

------------------>I'm Portgas D Ace!!!<-------------------
Keep Your Friends Close But You're Enemy Even Closer!!

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

@Playboy Penguin

shut the hell up. i used to respect you x(

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

True PP came up with alot of things one of the Best Strategic players in IC history... he's proven himself over and over with winning rounds and everything his original teams always pwn'ed and yes u PP Does write alot of stuff when he post but he's the same guy that never drops his ally and he always is one of the fams every time he puts up on everyone wants to ally.. Doesnt really matter what they say about u. u know that ur one of the best..

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

507

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

15     The Xeno Syndicate (2195)     422     944363     23465   Pop Quantam, they really need to stay out from fight if they wish to grow. 97 might be targetting them soon

We finally, edge up into position worthy of mention PVC, only to be smashed by 97, 93, 68.  NAP agreement with any of them seems impossible.  They all seem to LIKE farming small fams.  All buddy-buddy with leaders of other big fams, I suppose, and have no one they can really war but small start-up fams.

"Just last year when I was last playing, IC had around 2000 players, now it only has less than 1000. The decrease has been 50% in a year, pretty soon there will be no one."

I can see why.

Something's got to be done to save IC, here.  We should be able to have a big galaxy like Capri, but with a sort of adjudication process:  the smaller fam can apply to an adjudicator for a NAP to be enforced.  Mods should be able to look into the fam histories of all fams involved, check sent and received messages between all fams involved, and if they see the big fams are clearly farming little fams, they enforces a NAP.

508 (edited by [TiC]Hardcore4eva 16-May-2009 01:28:40)

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

Xeno, who made the first attacks between 95 and 97?  95 did.  Kirklestat made a couple attempts over a few days time in trying to hit our attackers in the right middle of sector 1 near our home system.  So we fought back and now you want to whine...

509

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

Besides, the PvC predicted 97 would hit 95 because of placement. Always moving outward, we've had disputes and small battles with 91 and 94 so it's not like we're only hitting small ones. Just the ones near us. We'd hit them if they were the same size, smaller or bigger because they're what we're near... Doesn't that make sense? If it doesn't then whatever.

510

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

It doesn't make sense.  It would make sense if big fams would fight big fams because every big fam wants to be #1 and not settle for anything less.

That isn't what is happening, though.  Seems big fams all settle easily and NAP amoung themselves and see who's best at farming small fams.

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

> Lucky+me=Snailsex wrote:

> true .. i say the unwritten rules should be clear to anyone .. or whutever..

making a name isn't done by winning the round.. hell if you winn its a team effort not one person

ic is truely losing its moral



Hypocrisy at its best!!

512

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

I say, SMALL FAMS UNITE!  Everybody explore one of your inactives inside 97's core and portal; also jump agents / wiz and sab / CPFF all their portals and nuke all their bankers everywhere - oh, wait - can't say that.  That's one of the 'unwritten' rules, right?  How nice for big fams to be able to break the unwritten rules, and smaller fams  cannot.

I mean, farming small fams is an 'unwritten' rule, right?  Tell you what.  Maybe if it isn't 'written', maybe it isn't a 'rule', hmm?

513

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

---------------
Family 2197
---------------
27 successful attacks against 2197.
84 lucky strikes by 2197.

73 planet(s) involved in the raging conflict.
15 of them are currently under our control (15 by retake)
57 of them are occupied by 2197 (12 by retake)
-----------------------------
We are DOWN by 42 planet(s).


All these in our core.

514 (edited by ~[PW9]KT~ 16-May-2009 06:34:28)

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

lol u guys are such hypocrits jeez u all shud catch a [] wake up and actually acknowledge sum things jeez u [] children

<Parrot> i bet if we asked random ic population they will know luster more than genesis

IF YOU WANT IT COME AND GET IT CAUSE ILL BE WAITING WITH MY ARMY TO SLAUGHTER YOURS

LuStEr

515

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

Seriously, if someone has to save IC from these big fams farming little ones, let it be the small fams.  All small fams just nukem.  Ruin a big fam's round for a change, instead of these big fams ruining small fams rounds again and again and again.  Enough is enough.

Small fams, let's nukem.  Seriouslyl.

516

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

Oh, and you mods (who, btw, rule these big fams who farm the little ones and also seem to be the ones propagating these so called 'unwritten' rules), go ahead and delete my account for this call to unite the small fams.  I mean, why would I want to come back, anyway.

Go ahead.  Keep killing IC.

517

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

huuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

518

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

What 97 is talking about is this:

FA    Week 28, 5        Vimanian Federation made an attack against planet 9 in the 132,27 system owned by April 26 1992 (2197), but the planet's defense was to strong.

132,27 - their core - pfft  lol as if.

We were portalled 132,26

Of course we would try and prevent 97 getting set up there one tick away.

132,27 - 97 core ... lol

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

AYB = our core

520

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

Meanwhile in year 5: look at other BIG fams trying to farm us:

---------------
Family 2193
---------------
9 successful attacks against 2193.
15 lucky strikes by 2193.

12 planet(s) involved in the raging conflict.
3 of them are currently under our control (3 by retake)
6 of them are occupied by 2193 (1 by retake)
-----------------------------
We are DOWN by 3 planet(s).

5 MIA planets:
134,1:9 - 134,1:1 - 134,1:3 - 134,1:2 -
134,1:24


---------------
Family 2168
---------------
2 successful attacks against 2168.
3 lucky strikes by 2168.

3 planet(s) involved in the raging conflict.
1 of them are currently under our control
2 of them are occupied by 2168 (1 by retake)
-----------------------------
We are DOWN by 1 planet(s).

1 MIA planets:
7,2:4


---------------
Family 2166
---------------
2 successful attacks against 2166.
1 lucky strikes by 2166.

1 planet(s) involved in the raging conflict.
0 of them are currently under our control
0 of them are occupied by 2166
-----------------------------
We are even.

521

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

cool story bro

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

522 (edited by xeno syndicated 16-May-2009 07:26:53)

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

Yes, Vim kept trying to break that planet, but never could.  Then, when 97 portal came up,

and for even attempting to do so, look what 97 does:

Year 6 so far:

Planets lost:

85 to #2197
9 to #2193
2 to #2168


68, 93 trying to farm us and all, is one thing, but this act by 97 is plain wrong.  I smell an illegal top-fam tri going about trying to farm start-up fams to get ranks up.  What has IC come to?

Seriously, screw your unwritten rules.  All small fams who are tired of taking this !@#$ from Big Fams round after round, message me ingame to coordinate exploring these fams' cores, and nuking these !@#$stards.

523 (edited by xeno syndicated 16-May-2009 05:30:08)

Re: *** Pretenders vs Contenders capricorn round 5 ***

'cool story bro'

Thanks. 

BTW, those fams who join this revolution against these big fams run by corrupt mods, will get mentioned in this round's history.

http://www.imperialconflict.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=48685