Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

To some yes, get that through your thick skull. I'm talking about the young 10-15 year olds who don't know better. Not the full grown adults

Not many people know this, but I own the first radio in Springfield. Not much on the air then, just Edison reciting the alphabet over and over. "A" he'd say; then "B." "C" would usually follow...

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

Better a law that let's dad flog kids when they get out of line

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

Noir this was unnecessary, refrain yourself.

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

Elro, it might sound harsh, but it did happen and its perfectly true the way i explained it. When Flint is mocking a bill that suggest to but restraints on internet abuse, i think it is relevant that Flint is very much so guilty of the crime.

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

Kids take themselves too seriously

Kill prom and varsity jackets

Made them understand that even the fabulous chicks are going to be fat at 40 so quit the drama

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

I'd say something like "Jump. Jump now."

But then I'd be leaving evidence of my second felony this year.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

32 (edited by avogadro 14-May-2009 05:53:50)

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

> Noir wrote:

> Elro, it might sound harsh, but it did happen and its perfectly true the way i explained it. When Flint is mocking a bill that suggest to but restraints on internet abuse, i think it is relevant that Flint is very much so guilty of the crime.



to make and argument is not a valid excuse to break forum rules "This further includes the distribution, release or discussion of any real-life, personal, or private information both real life and game related about other players"

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

Avogadro, and message that Flint has sent me he knows I can use it in the forums aswell. There is no information in that message that i have gathered in such a way so that i should not be allowed to show it to the community. What surprises me frankly is how none of you are commenting hte content of the message, it seems to me that not a single one on this forum is actually surprised by the mental instability or illness this person suffers from

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

Flint has every chance to come here and disprove these accusations aswell, but he does not, because he knows they are correct.

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

@flint; I'll edit it out because it does breach a forum-rule. But if you have a problem with it, you should have thought about that before you posted your website(including personal info) on this forum when you were working on your compression stuff a bit back.

@noir. see point avogadro, besides you did want to hurt/insult/mock him. No hurting in keeping things a bit nice around here.

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

Well the point is still valid, Flint is 100% unfit for this discussion. He is like a pedophile arguing against child protection laws

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

lol Most hilarious thread ever

38 (edited by Chris_Balsz 14-May-2009 15:26:28)

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

I'm the only person on this forum who ever got committed on a 72 hour hold, so what's supposedly so crazy about Einstein?

And you're just proving his point Noir, trying to deal with your crap without a direct physical confrontation is just a waste of time.

Oh and the answer to facebook noodging is to join Mafia Wars, when you get 280 friends asking for poker chips it buries everything else

btw I need a gold poker chip

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

39 (edited by Noir 14-May-2009 18:36:08)

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

Chriz you just proved you didnt understand a thing... Flint was allready blocked for his offenses back then, and im not one to go kill myself from a little internet abuse. However, others might, and thus Flint mocking a law protecting poeple from something he himself is guilty of, is just tasteless, specially when it can have such grave outcomes as suicide, and im sure everyone understands this.

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

i think the law would act to protect people like Flint from jerks like you who regret he didn't kill himself, "unfortunately", rather than isolate you from him

& the basis of preventing suicide is making the suicidal twerp, eg Chris Balsz, get it through his skull that nobody could make him kill himself except himself.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

The point here is mainly that repeated abuse and behaviour that can push ppl to suicide would be illegal in real life, and should also be illegal even tho its performed over the net, or over the phone etc.

Like you say yourself, the most important tool to fight suicide rates are not laws to crimilize such bahvior, but in the psych area. And that is also what i have been suggesting to people that have been in these kind of positions, such as flint, and im sure others could have been saved aswell, and just knowing that a small thing could have changed tragic outcomes such as Tigrine.

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: Flaming = Felony? Oh wait that censorship the dems want...

Kill 'em all.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]