Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Politics → Challenge: Gay Marriage
lol!!!
ignorance fail
you got owned son
![[TI] Primo](https://imperialconflict.com/forum/img/avatars/711.jpg)
"The union does not serve the natural and fundamental functions that heterosexual couples do."
May or may not be so, but where does it say it has to?
Hmmm i only read the starting page and the last, however my views on the topic:
Homosexually is an act against nature. No where in nature is homosexually normal, or else evolution and reproduction would not come about. Gay marriages if they so choose to have a child, would have to rely on terms of adoption, which would be further worst. Having a child grow up under a roof with 2 men (or 2 women) would confuse the childs state of mind of what's right and whats wrong, and would dispose the child to the idea of 2 men being together is normal and that they should follow suit.
Marriage is not a "term" or a "title" marriage is a vow, till death do you part. For those that think of it as a "Status" or "Title" your obviously no where near ready to get married, nor understand what it's about.
For those that believe that we can do as we please as long as it doesn't hurt anyone, sure that's all fair game ... but how can you expect a priest (or whoever does the marriage rights) to actually marry a gay couple? Again for #1 no matter what religion you practice, here in America we live by the standard "In God We Trust." So in essence if we're suppose to be living under gods word, how can you expect a religious man to marry you? Would that not go against everything he stand for?
More or less my biggest concern would be on a childs well-being and state of mind, as growing up under such circumstances will no doubt traumatize the child, be it from verbal abuse from his friends and the world, him battling his own mind. (as all normal people know its not right) Well let me rephrase that, Anyone living in homeostasis seeks to reproduce with the other gender, basic biology its something installed in us at birth to ensure our species. So when the child finally goes though their last stage of development they will encounter this problem, but knowing that mom and dad (dad and dad) are their parents, will i would give a big speech but it will become a conflict of the mind, they may even disown/dislike them for making such an act.
~ Cloud
> No where in nature is homosexually normal, or else evolution
> and reproduction would not come about.
No where in nature is eating candy, driving a car, having protected sex, etc. etc. etc.
> your obviously no where near ready to get married
They don't object to that, they want the same RIGHTS as a married person. Unions are just the same in terms of commitment and vows.
> More or less my biggest concern would be on a childs well-being
> and state of mind, as growing up under such circumstances will
> no doubt traumatize the child
Nonsense. A child is just as likely to grow up traumatized after being force-fed nonsense
about some alcohol zombie.
> they may even disown/dislike them for making such an act.
Its odd, but to go that far is absurd.
> how can a kid who has two dads be normal
How can a kid with only one parent be normal?
They adapt.
Oh and this is veering off into homophobia instead of gay marriage.
Skoe has no idea what he's talking about, it's pretty obvious. He compares a gay couple raising a kid, to an alcoholic parent .... wow
~ Cloud
"they want the same RIGHTS as a married person" Next people will wanna marry dogs, horses, and cats and crap and have RIGHTS to copulate with them .... common pal u gotta draw the line somewhere ...
~ Cloud
>>How can a kid with only one parent be normal?
They adapt.<<
Studies consistently show it's problematic. It happens, and there's nothing wrong with that, but it's not ideal. You can compare gay couples raising children to an alcoholic parent all you want, the point is men and women are different and children are best raised by one of each. We call them parents. Coincidentally one of each is required to create a child. What a coincidence. Mind blowing, I know.
>>Oh and this is veering off into homophobia instead of gay marriage.<<
It is not homophobia to discourge state sanctioned institutions encouraging mental disorders resulting from psychosis.
@jwilliams3605
> skoe did you have 2 daddys growing up that kissed each other then
> kissed you before dropping you to school.
I had two fathers, but neither was gay 
. One was a dead-beat step father and i guarantee you
i would prefer that my two younger siblings (whom he is the biological father) have had gay
parents.
> or did you get confused in the 3rd grade when a cute girl had a crush
> on you and you had a natural feeling of likewise attraction to her but
> were brought up believing boys are supposed to be with boys and girls
> with girls.
You don't think that someone in the 3rd grade would have questions?
These questions would be answered. "ITS OK TO LIKE GIRLS" the gay parents would say.
> or how about parents class day when everyone came in with mom and dad or maybe just a
> single mom or dad which is normal but you showed up with daddy and papa how would you
> feel? Or would you just tell everyone one of them is your uncle.
This would only be a problem is the rest of the parents and students were homophobic, and
didn't accept the gay couple as they were.
> how can a kid grow normal in that enviroment?
How can a kid grow up with an alcoholic parent? Or a single parent? Or an abusive parent?
Not as well.
@~Pw 32~ Random Hero
> Skoe has no idea what he's talking about, it's pretty obvious. He
> compares a gay couple raising a kid, to an alcoholic parent .... wow
Are you saying you would prefer to leave the children of your country in
the hands of alcoholics then gays? Then you have no idea. In fact,
you are just spewing hate for no reason -- don't try and disguise your
homophobia within your arguments. This has nothing to do with gay marriage.
> Next people will wanna marry dogs, horses, and cats and crap and have
> RIGHTS to copulate with them .... common pal u gotta draw the line somewhere ...
Its called the line of the mentally capable. ONLY mentally capable beings should
be married (or be allowed to "be" together) for that matter. Animals, the mentally
handicapped, children, all should be a no-no.
Homosexuals have a mental disorder. Does that mean you don't think they should marry?
I reitorate that ignoring the many different reasons for why this should not happen is why gay marriage lost in California, in Oregon, in most States. It is why when the people get their say in Ohio it will be stopped again.
My argument remains firm.
Name calling the reasons I posted, or ignoring them, nor trying to say religion should not matter is a losing proposition, for clearly religion still matters even to the black community.
Imperial Forum → Politics → Challenge: Gay Marriage
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.