thats a lot of work for 5 euros brah

Zarf if you make an answer that works here, I am nominating you to be President, and will work hard to make sure you get elected

They probably didn't expect them all to sign peace treaties.

USA reaching out to them, and these countries rejecting it will favour the public opinion about USA. If people think the USA is trying to create peace rather than conquer resource-rich areas, they might just not join the Taliban/Al Qaida to fight Americans.

It's all common sense really.

Dollars

> The Democrats believe they can make peace with everyone and anyone.
< [snippy]
> But if the Democrats cannot convince Republicans, after how many decades
> of their party existing, to follow in lock step with Democrat ideals... How can
> they convince those who speak a different language, have a different religion,
> have a different economy, have a different world view?

You are using two completely different examples. If we take what you say about
these 'democrat' ideals as truth lets compare the two examples: Creating peace
with another society and converting the political views of other people.

In the first example (creating peace) it can be seen that peace is advantageous to
(pretty much) all parties involved: it promotes more stable and stronger economies,
it ensures freedoms. Its a bargaining system: We give you X, you give us Y. A system
used throughout time in MANY different forms.

The second example (conversion of politics) can be seen as a conversion of faith: Forcing
people to change their beliefs (either through words of wisdom, or whatever other means).

The second example takes away peoples rights of freedom and removes the balance of
politics (left vs. right, as stupid as it is, can be important in a GENERAL OVERVIEW of things).

So to summarize and already summarized response:

Peace brings advantageous change that has effects which propogate many areas.
Changing political beliefs removes the balance and removes peoples freedom.

Now i have answered . You can keep your money though, give it to a local childrens
charity or inject it into your local economy.

lol @ Zarf trying to create wiggle room.

Yes world peace, for all eternity could be one standard, but just trying to get Republicans who are conservative to vote on Liberal items as if they are all good without corruption involved (aka buyouts with spending in xyz Republicans state) will do.

"How can they convince those who speak a different language, have a different religion, have a different economy, have a different world view?"

By stripping naked and lying dormant thru whatever sexual abuses follow.

pay up.

You allowed him to inject it in the local economy?

Flint, I would take him up on the offer if I were you.  It means either you have to actually spend the time debating with Skoe, or you can... spend $1,000 on stuff. 

You have to answer to "his" satisfaction, though.  That means all he has to say is that he's unsatisfied, and you lose.  Therefore, for you to win, you would inevitably have to say, "okay, why are you unsatisfied?"  Thus... a debate.

Soft drinks are the key thing in that plan.

I'm not trying to say who would win.  Just saying that he has a shot to respond. 

> I'm not trying to say who would win.  Just saying that he
> has a shot to respond.

But i don't see how its debatable. I have basically answered his
question by pointing out that he has given two completely, and logically,
different examples...

> Since he said answered to HIS satisfaction
> he'll never owe you

Like i said, i don't want his money. Childrens charity or local
economy it should go to -- the latter could just be flint buying
food and provisions, and paying the bills .