handgun for democrats

http://www.plnewsforum.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/50396/

Sure if you remove axes then the incidence of axe murder drops

They just use something else

You're ignorant. Where do you live? I want to give a donation to your community's schools. You kids aren't learning math and it's hurting the world economy. As well as making me feel bad for you. I'd rather pay to educate your kids than listen to more of this ignorant, self-righteous garbage. It's one thing to be on opposite sides of philosophical differences, and quite another to be ignorant and cocky spewing a bunch of garbage rhetoric 10 year olds would be embarassed to hear.

Read what? Your ramblings "clearly if I say this is how it is, it is!"

You post how you feel about the safety of issues as if your ignorance counts for something. The facts don't care how you feel.

The "facts" back schniepel, USA has third world murder rates.

The difference between US murder rates and Civilised countries murder rates, is US gun murders.

Since the murder rates are basically flat over a decade, we have most probably hit the number of people who will kill anyhow

While guns have always been an american method of murder, there's train derailment, arson, bombing planes, tmapering with drugs. Biggest unsolved case in US is the Tylenol poisoning- random tmapering of medicine. Olympics were bombed. Oklahoma city was a bombing. Worst school massacre before columbine was a schoolhouse bombing. In 1934 a wackjob started a fire on the cruise ship Castle Morro that killed hundreds, he got caught after he murdered his landlords in the 1950s with a hammer. In the 1950s a guy dynamited an airliner and killed 30 people for insurance on one of the passengers. Most serial killings do not involve a gun. John Wayne Gacy, strangler. Jeffrey Dahmer, stabbing and bludgeoned. Ted Bundy, stabbimg and strangling. Running over with cars is a popular method because you have a good chance to BS it as an accident if you're ballsy enough.

well there is exactlly 1 country with more guns then the US..
And that would be Yemen

now i found this

http://www.yobserver.com/news-varieties/10013289.html

since guns in yemen had been banned.. murder rate decreased.

The US murder rates are not high enough for me to care about changing the status quo. They may be higher than in Europe, but by and large we still have a life expectancy comparable to other Western countries. We value guns, and our security is not compromised enough for me to care about banning them.

Yes, clearly the sociopolitical conditions of Yemen are comparable to those of the USA. I'm sure we can make many parellels between the nations that will hold up under any kind of scrutiny (that is, for anyone with the remotest concern for the truth).

Where is your evidence that the murder rate in the USA would significantly decrease if firearms were outlawed? All you do is repeat that it's so obvious to you intellectual elite and call everyone who disagrees ignorant because you have nothing to base your position on but your feelings.

and btw its funny.. you call other ignoratn in almost any of your posts. so i guess you count yourself to this interlectual elite...

>>as i said before.. its all theory what would happen in the US if guns be banned.. so i can not bring any evidence for it.<<

No other nations have significant gun ownership but less murder rates? Yes, they do. You just can't find any that support your position.

>>and btw its funny.. you call other ignoratn in almost any of your posts. so i guess you count yourself to this interlectual elite...<<

If you're asking if I'm embarassed to respond to half of the kids on this forum: Yes, it is embarassing. I'm specific and clear. I respond to content. When I get 90% cry and 0% content response showing anything I said which you disagree with, I openly state that you're embarassing yourself by being dishonest, if not ignorant and/or just stupid.