• Posts: 698

Re: 1762 vs 1728 1745

what 200?
are you drunk?
more like 20 or 30

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,735

Re: 1762 vs 1728 1745

show ur conflict news.. n prove me wrong.

Just Do It √

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,216
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 1762 vs 1728 1745

lol, bonanza, more like 100

and damn near all of them were retaken

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 924

Re: 1762 vs 1728 1745

Lagos and Artic should better attack instead of posting stupid things in uni news smile ... I hope they picked up my message and get this fam back on tracks.

5 planet(s) captured by WET Artic (83 %) (3 retakes).
1 planet(s) captured by WET Million (17 %) (1 retakes).

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,988
  • Tag points: 241

Re: 1762 vs 1728 1745

lol

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: -2

Re: 1762 vs 1728 1745

Look Pa! Our bankers match them except theirs aren't retakes.


5 planet(s) captured by Kobe Bryant (100 %).
1 planet(s) captured by Tina Turner (25 %).

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 896
  • Tag points: 66

Re: 1762 vs 1728 1745

200?!?!? bogus. they posted a successful attack reports. they succeeded like 229 times.BUT that report includes retaking the same system over and over again like 5 times. we bounced back and forth a couple systems for a while, thats why the number is so high.

true they did gain some ground but not anymore. definetly did not take 200 of our planets lol

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,735

Re: 1762 vs 1728 1745

what happen to 62?

Just Do It √

0 Dislike 0 Post Points