>>but talking to you was simply useless because all u can do is go to threads and make bad comments about the posters.<<
You're ignoring the posts which contend that you are wrong seriously in favor of reposting a topic WITHOUT addressing its serious posts of dissent. Until you are up to actually addressing the arguments against your position, you are in no position to make "bad comments" about me because... I made a "bad comment" about you? I explained myself. You're obviously incapable.
---------------------------------OFF-TOPIC JUNK IN RESPONSE (just being thorough. here's your warning.)----------------------------------------
>>you never made us to enlighten us with ur illness so we can see if true or not.<<
I spent a short while looking for statistics on money spent on care/number of people seeking care in foreign nations. I looked for US citizens traveling abroad and non-US citizens traveling to the USA for care. I failed to find anything very comprehensive (when at all). Rather than spend more time looking for statistics which, as I explained, wouldn't mean anything to a forum comprised primarily of kids who can't digest [even basic] statistics anyway, I let the topic go. I _even explained_ (hard to comprehend, right? obviously so... you didn't get the message, and here we are) this and didn't continue making fun of the ignorant retards in the thread. If you want to argue that it is reasonable to expect me spending more time gathering data for little kids, go for it. But I'd feel silly doing it, let alone arguing that one should.
I have no idea what you posted on your income. It's embarassing enough addressing small children half the time. I don't want to know about your finances.
>>when its about weapons you come with the right for self defense and ignore all facts<<
Yeah, read that thread again. You'll feel bad for children ALL over the world. It's in line for dumbest thread of kids shitting on the forum ever. Fine example. I'll gloss over how your claiming I "ignore all facts" is a dumb lie. If it could be more backwards... No. Nevermind. It couldn't.
>> i gave u the statistics about murder rates with guns there.. but.. you wont care.. u dont care for information.. you only care for insults.<<
Yeah, read that thread again. "the statistics about murder rates with guns there." WHAT A STATISTIC! That tells us so much. You can read that thread to the end to see me go on at length as to why this is retarded. I HIGHLY suggest NO ONE ELSE read that thread. It's so [ ]ing stupid you'll want to... do most anything but read that thread.
---------------------------------END OFF-TOPIC JUNK IN RESPONSE (just being thorough. here's your warning.)----------------------------------------
>>whats your fucking problem lol...<<
I just pointed out that you're just spamming your arguments against strawmen arguments. A strawman "argument" is a fallacious argument in which one person argues against a position which another does not actually hold. The goal is to make the position look obviously silly in the hopes that ignorant morons bearing witness will confuse the "strawman" (the position you're attacking which no one holds) with the actual argument of the opposition to your view.
You didn't have to get all bent out of shape about it and point to other instances where you have failed to respond to the most basic of dialogues. My post was a line long.
[I wish I could obey forum rules]