26

Re: Anser me this

The treadmill moves the wheels at whatever speed it wants. The conveyor still matches the speed of the wheel. The plane pushes air against air to move. It doesn't push against the ground. Thus a plane can take off on a conveyor . . .

Rehabilitated IC developer

27 (edited by A10 07-Mar-2009 21:55:12)

Re: Anser me this

>the question is if it can be airborne while stationary, not if an airplane's engine is powerful enough to overcome the friction of the wheels.

The question is can a plane take off from a conveyor tongue

Rehabilitated IC developer

28 (edited by avogadro 07-Mar-2009 21:56:57)

Re: Anser me this

> A10 wrote:

> The treadmill moves the wheels at whatever speed it wants. The conveyor still matches the speed of the wheel. The plane pushes air against air to move. It doesn't push against the ground. Thus a plane can take off on a conveyor . . .


there was never a question if a plane can take off from a conveyor. because the conveyor could be going a fraction of a mile per hour and it would be cake. the question is if the conveyor matched the wheel speed, so that the plane would be stationary, if it could take off. and when the plane is moving forward while still ont he ground, it shows that the conveyor isnt matching the wheel speed, so the experiment is void, its no more impressive then taking off from a conveyor moving at a fraction of a mile per hour.

29

Re: Anser me this

>there was never a question if a plane can take off from a conveyor. because the conveyor could be going a fraction of a mile per hour and it would be cake. the question is if the conveyor matched the wheel speed, so that the plane would be stationary, if it could take off. and when the plane is moving forward while still ont he ground, it shows that the conveyor isnt matching the wheel speed, so the experiment is void, its no more impressive then taking off from a conveyor moving at a fraction of a mile per hour.

Regardless of conveyor speed, a plane will always take off assuming the wheels are perfectly balanced because a plane pushes against air not ground. A plane is on a conveyor. The conveyor is moving at take off speed. The planes engines are off. Plane turns engines on and moves air. Plane accelerates and takes off despite the conveyor because it's engines are not pushing on the conveyor. It's engines are pushing on the air which is not moving.

Rehabilitated IC developer

30 (edited by Pixies 07-Mar-2009 22:32:33)

Re: Anser me this

Ugh. Right, this is getting disgusting. I'm an aerospace engineering student (informally known as rocket science tongue). From a book I have:

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6-_iGbJHM-8C&pg=PA301&lpg=PA301&dq=%22when+a+moving+wing+is+close+to+the+ground%22&source=bl&ots=uD6m9ZTdrS&sig=wqfFtBthakNX2rVHb9nhG2Z28yg&hl=en&ei=b-SySYXsI6TEjAfera3tBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result [edit] bah..you'll have it open this link in a seperate tab, doesnt work by click on this link :s.

If you take a look at that graph you'll see lift is totally dependant on AIRSPEED. Lift is the force on the aircraft used to overcome the aircrafts mass and take it off off the ground. If the aircraft is on a conveyer belt, and is not going anywhere, no lift is generated. If the thrust produced by the aircraft matches say a conveyer belt speed of 100mph, it is still not going anywhere, and still no lift is produced.

Pixies My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard, and they're like you wanna trade cards?

31

Re: Anser me this

>If you take a look at that graph you'll see lift is totally dependant on AIRSPEED. Lift is the force on the aircraft used to overcome the aircrafts mass and take it off off the ground. If the aircraft is on a conveyer belt, and is not going anywhere, no lift is generated. If the thrust produced by the aircraft matches say a conveyer belt speed of 100mph, it is still not going anywhere, and still no lift is produced.

A plane on a conveyor gains speed relative to the air. The air around the conveyor is stationary. The plane still pushes against the stationary air to accelerate just the same.

Rehabilitated IC developer

Re: Anser me this

So if you have a conveyer belt to compensate for the forward thrust produced by an engine, the plane is effectively stationary.

Im not sure if you're getting confused A10. A propeller accelerates air in one direction (a force), and so results in an equal and opposite force which is what thrust is. Increasing this acceleration of air increases the thrust produced, and hence forward velocity. Once their is a forward velocity (the aircraft is moving forward through the ambient air), there is an airflow over the wings of the aircraft. This airflow produces lift. Once enough lift is produced (lift > weight of aircraft), the aircraft will take off. The airflow produced by the propellers/turbines of the engine has nothing to do with generating lift.

Pixies My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard, and they're like you wanna trade cards?

33

Re: Anser me this

> [RPA] Arocalex wrote:

> Imagine a 747 is sitting on a conveyor belt, as wide and long as a runway. The conveyor belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels, moving in the opposite direction. Can the plane take off?



No because there's no pilot inside

34 (edited by Chris_Balsz 07-Mar-2009 23:24:22)

Re: Anser me this

Yeah but. Until the lift from forward velocity is sufficient to cancel out gravity its still gonna put weight DOWN onto the wheel.  That's why it has wheels instead of legs, so it can still move while pushing down.  A VTOL gets around that by having engine thrust go to lifting the plane up.  Releived of the need to fight gravity, moderate lateral engine thrust builds airspeed.  If the speed of the conveyor belt was equal to ENGINE thrust (not wheel speed) the plane would just bob up and down in place.

Now, how many 100kg Jews would it take to stop a freight train weighing 1,000,000 kg moving 50kp/h?

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Anser me this

Mythbusters just failed in my opinion then. A model airplane is hardly the same dynamics as a 747.

A treadmill moving does generate some low air movement, a model airplane would find possibly enough to work with that small amount of air.

However a 747 would never get enough air flow from that, and engine outtake... even if a propeller variant of the 747, would never get enough wind under the wings for a take off (unless a tornado or hurricane was pushing in one of two directions)

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

36 (edited by Chris_Balsz 07-Mar-2009 23:50:27)

Re: Anser me this

didnt you see "Flight of the Phoenix"? a model aircraft is not a toy!!!

it takes 1 100kg Jew to put the brake on a train.

That seemed funnier when I wrote it, guess I shouldn't stay up until 8 am if I'm gonna tell jokes

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

37 (edited by Undeath 08-Mar-2009 02:45:02)

Re: Anser me this

Ignoring that.

Assumptions:
the [apples] are lined up on the track with 1 [apple] per 0.5m.
at the point of the first impact, the engines are turned off,
there is no friction type forces acting other than that of the [apples]
as soon as a [apple] is hit, he is off the track

50km = 50000m
50000m/3600s = 13.89m/s
momentum = mass x velocity = 1000000 x 13.89 = 13890000kgm/s
Effectively the [apples] would act like friction (think of brakes).
[apple] = mass x gravitational constant = 100 x 9.81 = 981N

Time taken to stop train = 13890000/981 = 14159 seconds
As there are no other forces acting other than [apple] friction:
velocity / time taken to stop train = rate of loss of velocity per second = 13.89/14159 = 9.81e-4
1 / rate of loss of velocity per second = distance to stop = 1/9.81e-4 = 1019.39m
distance / [apple] size = 1019.39 / 0.5 = 2038.74

As the train is still moving after 2038 [apples], it would take the 2039th [apple] to stop it.

2039 [apple].


Much cheaper than gas or bullets yikes!

Pixies My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard, and they're like you wanna trade cards?

Re: Anser me this

would you not say that the airoplane is actualy generating thrust? because if it didn't how could it stay stationary on a conveyor belt?

Does this not mean that there is actual airflow? because if there wasn't how does the plane stay there. All you need is enough force

Not many people know this, but I own the first radio in Springfield. Not much on the air then, just Edison reciting the alphabet over and over. "A" he'd say; then "B." "C" would usually follow...

Re: Anser me this

There is an airflow created by the acceleration of air through the engine, however that airflow does not flow over the wings. Airflow over the wings produce lift. The thrust moving an aircraft forward means the aircraft is moving through ambient air, meaning an airflow is created over the wings. If a conveyer belt cancels this forward movement of the aircraft, the aircraft is effectively stationary in relation to the ambient air and so there is no airflow over the wings.

Due to the shape of a wing, air flowing over the top is accelerated more than the air beneath the wing. The faster the air flows, the lower the air pressure. So effectively a wing creates a region of lower pressure above it than below it, creating a net aerodynamic force upwards, called lift.

Pixies My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard, and they're like you wanna trade cards?

Re: Anser me this

> Pixies wrote:

> There is an airflow created by the acceleration of air through the engine, however that airflow does not flow over the wings. Airflow over the wings produce lift. The thrust moving an aircraft forward means the aircraft is moving through ambient air, meaning an airflow is created over the wings. If a conveyer belt cancels this forward movement of the aircraft, the aircraft is effectively stationary in relation to the ambient air and so there is no airflow over the wings.

Due to the shape of a wing, air flowing over the top is accelerated more than the air beneath the wing. The faster the air flows, the lower the air pressure. So effectively a wing creates a region of lower pressure above it than below it, creating a net aerodynamic force upwards, called lift.
<

Obviously that is all bullcrap tongue

If you have a small enough plane with a strong enough engine it works. Only thing limiting it is the strength of the engine, although a propeller engine also creates its own life by blowing the air backwards no?

Or a couple of propellers mounted on the wings

Not many people know this, but I own the first radio in Springfield. Not much on the air then, just Edison reciting the alphabet over and over. "A" he'd say; then "B." "C" would usually follow...

Re: Anser me this

This was tested on mythbusters (on a smaller scale with a sport plane), and the plane took off.

Lemming of Fountains and Eltie Worshipper

Re: Anser me this

I thought we were talking about a 747?

I'm an aerospace engineering students ffs. I've made working remote control aircraft from scratch, I'm currently designing a small 2-person aircraft. Don't argue with me about this tongue

Pixies My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard, and they're like you wanna trade cards?

Re: Anser me this

it don't mean crap until we blow up an Airbus proving/disproving it!!!

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Anser me this

Jeez, I am a friggin math man from heck, and I am telling you that it is not possible.

1) Thrust == Drag in your example, therefore there is only air through the engines, the engines do not lift an aircraft unless it is that Marine transport, or a helicopter, or a VSTOL type aircraft like the harrier.

2) Wing span is essential, why do you think if you take the wings off that a standard aircraft cannot fly?

3) Some propeller aircraft DO provide thrust UNDER a wing by incidental circumstances, half the propeller on each wing goes under the wing. So in theory a propeller aircraft could take off. However a jet engine never places air flow under a wing.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: Anser me this

this is a good example, why i dont bother with intelligent posts in the forums. people dont care what the aerospace engineer says, they believe what they want to believe and totally ignore other people's points.

Re: Anser me this

WILL IT TAKE OFF!????

op is a faggot

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

47 (edited by avogadro 08-Mar-2009 03:35:31)

Re: Anser me this

it is physically impossible for the wheels on the airplane to be rolling on the treadmill at the same speed but in the opposite direction, and be anything but stationary laterally. if the plane moves forward while on the ground,t he wheels have to be moving faster then the treadmill. so given the condition that the wheels and treadmill are moving at the same speed in oppositte directions, the question is, can the plane take off from a stationary position. no, it cannot, unless  its one of acouple planes that were designed to.

48 (edited by A10 08-Mar-2009 03:36:31)

Re: Anser me this

Avo, Shut it troll.



Say we have two objects. A long (like the size of a runway) conveyor moving at the planes max speed and a stationary tree next to the conveyor.

Now how do planes work? Do they turn their wheels or do they create thrust by pushing air against air?

On a conveyor at the planes max speed the plane will turn on it's engines and push against the stationary air. No matter how fast it's wheels are spinning it will move forward relative to the tree. It will take off in it's normal takeoff distance relative to the tree no matter how fast the conveyor is moving. The planes wheels are free moving. By the time the plane takes off the wheels will be spinning twice as fast as the speed of the plane but the plan doesn't move forward by depending on the traction of the wheels. It moves forward by pushing the air which unlike the conveyor is not moving.

Rehabilitated IC developer

49 (edited by avogadro 08-Mar-2009 03:37:47)

Re: Anser me this

> A10 wrote:

> On a conveyor at the planes max speed the plane will turn on it's engines and push against the stationary air. No matter how fast it's wheels are spinning it will move forward relative to the tree. It will take off in it's normal takeoff distance relative to the tree no matter how fast the conveyor is moving. The planes wheels are free moving. By the time the plane takes off the wheels will be spinning twice as fast as the speed of the plane but the plan doesn't move forward by depending on the traction of the wheels. It moves forward by pushing the air which unlike the conveyor is not moving.


i agree, but that wasnt the question. "Imagine a 747 is sitting on a conveyor belt, as wide and long as a runway. The conveyor belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels, moving in the opposite direction. Can the plane take off?" read the OP, NOOB

Re: Anser me this

see it? "conveyor belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels, moving in the opposite direction" the wheels, not the plane or jet or whatever, yeah, so gtfo you moron