> Justinian I wrote:

> > K. William Fancsali wrote:

> Keeping him from having to buy sex? I am against incest.>

Naw he's being ambiguous to suggest something more twisted. But he's referring to the fact that my mom occasionally comes to my apartment to deliver groceries. But fyi, omg ewww I would never...<

I don't see how that was ambiguous, it was a reference to that post in another thread about your mother filling you fridge with fud =/

Legalising prostitution won't stop the trafficking of young, sometimes underaged women.

> Justinian I wrote:

> > &#9760;ARFeh&#9760; wrote:

I don't see how that was ambiguous, it was a reference to that post in another thread about your mother filling you fridge with fud =/>

It sort of was.

And it's food.<

It sort of wasn't.

THAT'S all in your head.

What was Freud say...

And fud.

> Justinian I wrote:

> Let people engage in a harmless trade if they want.

The only reason it's illegal in the US is because idiots don't understand that trafficking and pimping are separate things from prostitution. Prostitution may involve pimping and trafficking, but they are not essential to it. These contemptible things may be common in low-scale prostitution where intercourse may cost $20-40, but it isn't so common in medium - upscale prostitution where intercourse will cost at least $150-$200. Nonetheless, the point is that these bad things are not essential to prostitution, and secondly it doesn't help to stop it when the trade is illegal. It's like arguing that alcohol should be banned because of a few idiots. Then when it's illegal, argue it should remain illegal because of the crime associated with it.

While pimps and traffickers should go to jail, there is no reason why seeing a medium - expensive call girl should be a crime. Moreover, there is absolutely no reason why a guy should fear going to jail for offering a woman to engage in prostitution. Hell, pairs (dating and marriage) and prostitution are basically the same

And lastly, who gives a crap about sexual morality other than crazy christian nutjobs who think these women are psychologically disturbed? Yeah these organizations may show that a person coerced in to prostitution isn't psychologically healthy, but that doesn't mean prostitutes shouldn't be allowed to engage in the trade if it's their free choice.

As far as I know, hiring a call girl isn't illegal...neither is going to a "massage" parlour. In both cases,  you're buying time (or a massage). What two consenting adults then choose to do with that time is up to them....which is one reason why the parlours and agencies operate freely and openly (It makes it it really hard to prove solicitation).

They're not old enough or social enough to know that it goes on regularly and rather openly, Theodora.

lol @ gladiator

bah, make it legal and tax them. ^.^ Government shouldn't have any say in terms of what people can and cannot do to their own bodies. Hell prostitution was legal in this country until the 1910's or something like that.

Flint: aren't you for freedom of people?

How can a country be for the freedom to buy a gun but not buy love?

> Destroyyoutoo wrote:

> Side note:  I remember this thread from 3 years ago

Same

Theodora,

You are correct. Escorting is not by itself illegal, however that doesn't mean the girls or agencies do not take precautions to avoid arrest. When you call an agency, they make inquiries to make sure you aren't a cop, for example. The girls will sometimes also wait for the man to undress first and indicate him to do so by saying something like "make yourself comfortable" to first time clients. Most also forbid explicit language over the phone, and communication during the first engagement is typically implicit (unless she's a n00b).

But the police still sting escorts and clients of escorts. They do it because prostitution is illegal, and the law knows that escorting correlates with implicit prostitution. If you are intelligent and cautious, you can probably avoid being arrested in a sting. Nevertheless, even though escorting allows you to circumvent the illegality of prostitution to a high degree, it isn't enough. There's no valid reason to ban it, and it should principally be legalized.

Einstein,

From what I know, promiscuity correlates with other risky behaviors. It's more probable imo that the promiscuous women you know who have those physiological conditions are also drug users. I fail to see how one's physiology could be radically altered like that by a variety of partners. It makes absolutely no sense, and nor is there is a medical record from a reputable organization that has identified promiscuity as a cause for those physiological conditions.

I agree that anal sex is disgusting and HIV more easily transmitable through anal sex than by vaginal sex, but whether it' natural is irrelevant.

Fool,

Lol. It's a contradictory trend among Republicans. They want to give people more freedom, except they are authoritarian when that freedom contradicts Christianity.

I don't think it's buying love. Love, in a strictly romantic sense, is the feeling you get from a mate that compels you to invest in them and raise offspring together. In other contexts, love is the feeling you get from other people that compels you to invest in them as a mutual benefit.

When you copulate with an escort, the conditions for a chemical reaction to cause love aren't typically present. What you feel is sexual satisfaction.

> Chris_Balsz wrote:

> How like a Canuk

whoring is sweet and natural, but tax evasion...that's...that's perverted!!!!>

Get laid

> ~Pw 32~ Random Hero wrote:

> Just ... how do you know so much about escorts? You actually paid some chick to screw you?

~ Cloud>

Yeah. I took her to dinner and bought her gifts .