276 (edited by BiefstukFriet 19-Feb-2009 17:04:32)

Re: Resource-based economy

> xeno syndicated wrote:

> You just can't get your heads around the resource-based economy, can you?  You just can't see that it is already here; you can't see that it is growing; and you just can't see it is going to replace the monetary system as intercommunication technology continues to develop and free individuals from the tyrannical institutions of the past.

Resource economy works like this, numbnutts:

Party A has a skill, let's say, as an example, massage.  Party B has a skill, let's say, again as an example, good grammar and editing skills.  Party C doesn't have skills yet as they are still a student, but Party B has an uncle (Party D) who has a farm out in the country.  Party C is a student with bad grammar, and needs someone to edit their essays.  So, Party C makes an arrangement with Party A, B and D: in exchange for party B editing Party C's essays over the course of the semester, Party A will provide massage therapy for Party B and in turn Party D will provide Party A with such and such amount of smoked sausage that is produced on Party D's farm.  Party C, in turn will work over the summer months on Party D's farm.  This is, in effect, an exchange based entirely on credit, a loan taken out by Party C from Party B. 

Now, these sorts of transactions happen all the time.  In fact, such transactions account for up to 1/3 of the real economy.  As the internet develops and intercommunication becomes more convenient and inexpensive, expect the ratio to grow to 1/2.  Expect tax income, therefore, to dwindle.  Expect, therefore, the resource-based economy to take over.  And if you're smart, you'll embrace it.  If you're not, you'll go work for a bank.

Now, to save our 'precious' monetary banking system, I would suggest you financial twits start thinking about the notion of resource-based credits.  I mean, it is only in your sector's best interest.  Haven't you seen which sectors have been experiencing the job-losses lately?




How many services do I need to preform to get; A sausage, a roof over my head, a X-Box, a Car, indoor plumbing?

What if the guy with the cars doesn't like my cinnamon rolls? sad

Je maintiendrai

Re: Resource-based economy

I don't think he realizes that stupid people aren't a resource worth any credit.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

278 (edited by Zarf BeebleBrix 19-Feb-2009 21:54:09)

Re: Resource-based economy

Xeno, you didn't address my resource curse stuff at all.  You still cause the resource curse because my trade argument says the resource economy would prevent international trade by creating added incentives for not trading.  That forces service and manufacturing economies to acquire resources by force, devaluing the individual in order to obtain resources.

I'll get to addressing your stuff later on... but just know that you can't claim any of the advantages of your economy until you win that it doesn't cause the resource curse.

Make Eyes Great Again!

The Great Eye is watching you... when there's nothing good on TV...

279

Re: Resource-based economy

International trade is wasteful, and unnecessary.  Every nation has the potential to produce domestically enough goods to satisfy its people's basic needs.

The notion that without international trade there is war is a fallacy.

280 (edited by xeno syndicated 21-Feb-2009 02:12:09)

Re: Resource-based economy

>>What if the guy with the cars doesn't like my cinnamon rolls?<<

Intercommunication would solve that problem.  Maybe you like Party A's free-ranged eggs.  But Party A might not want your cinnamon buns.  However, you know a gardener (Party B).  Party A might want Party B's gardening services.  So you aproach both Party A and Party B with a contract. 

In exchange for x# of free-ranged eggs delivered to your door every week, you make x# of cinnamon rolls for Party B, who then works x# of hours per week at party A's yard.

281 (edited by Zarf BeebleBrix 21-Feb-2009 02:42:19)

Re: Resource-based economy

> xeno syndicated wrote:

> International trade is wasteful, and unnecessary.  Every nation has the potential to produce domestically enough goods to satisfy its people's basic needs.

The notion that without international trade there is war is a fallacy.



1: You're going against every real economist known to man.  Pure and simple.
2: There's no justification behind this.
3: International trade doesn't assume that certain nations can't obtain key resources.  It's called comparative advantage.

Let me use my favorite example.  Assume that Tiger Woods could mow his lawn in 5 minutes.  Or he could have you mow it, and it would take you two hours to mow it for $10.00.  Even if he is better than you at mowing the lawn, he should hire you because in the time you are doing that, he can earn tons more money by making a new advertisement or something.

Just because someone CAN produce their own resources, it doesn't mean they SHOULD.
4: Prove that trade is bad.  Do your own open heart surgery.
5: Certain nations can't obtain those resources.  Farming in the Middle East is retarded.  Drilling for oil in Luxembourg is retarded.  Trying to hire an IT guy in Nigeria is retarded.  Do I seriously need to go on?


As for the trade vs war tradeoff, I'm empirically right on this.

1: World War 2.  The US stopped selling rubber to Japan.  Japan was forced to declare war on the US because it couldn't get its own rubber without obtaining resources.
2: Imperialism in the 16th-18th century.
3: Arguably, the Iraq war.
4: Blood diamonds.
5: Iran-Iraq war.
6: Opium wars.


You are seriously arguing that a lack of resources doesn't cause war?  Um... you are just wrong on so many levels.



Not to mention that you provided nothing to substantiate either of your claims.  You just said it.

Make Eyes Great Again!

The Great Eye is watching you... when there's nothing good on TV...

Re: Resource-based economy

> xeno syndicated wrote:

> >>What if the guy with the cars doesn't like my cinnamon rolls?<<

Intercommunication would solve that problem.  Maybe you like Party A's free-ranged eggs.  But Party A might not want your cinnamon buns.  However, you know a gardener (Party B).  Party A might want Party B's gardening services.  So you aproach both Party A and Party B with a contract. 

In exchange for x# of free-ranged eggs delivered to your door every week, you make x# of cinnamon rolls for Party B, who then works x# of hours per week at party A's yard.

I can not even imagine how many people I need to contact and keep in touch with if I ever wanted to make something complicated.. Hell, I think my cinnamon rolls would become impossible to make, what with Cinamon coming from the other side of the world and all.


This system might only work on a backwater farming village.

Je maintiendrai

Re: Resource-based economy

I was going to bring that up, Bief.  Not to mention that at long distances, you need get things transported, which requires you figure out a way to pay services to someone ten thousand miles away.

Make Eyes Great Again!

The Great Eye is watching you... when there's nothing good on TV...

284

Re: Resource-based economy

"You are seriously arguing that a lack of resources doesn't cause war?  Um... you are just wrong on so many levels."

No.  I'm saying it doesn't have to.

285

Re: Resource-based economy

"I can not even imagine how many people I need to contact and keep in touch with if I ever wanted to make something complicated.. Hell, I think my cinnamon rolls would become impossible to make, what with Cinamon coming from the other side of the world and all."



No.  It is the future for all of us.  A simple mobile-phone client program could easily keep track of all the chains of transaction for you (why you'd be interested, I don't know).  I don't think most people would bother keeping track of it.  All they'd care about is that the expected incoming-resources and outgoing-resources are showing up and being delivered on time.


"This system might only work on a backwater farming village."

I does already work in backwater farming villages, where the majority of the population of the human race live and work. 

Where it doesn't get implemented is within the urban centers of developed countries, partly because people there are so brainwashed into thinking they can't learn anything from the rest of humanity, but mainly because the governments and corporations in control of such areas don't allow such a system to develop.

Actually that piece of mobile-phone client software that could keep track of such transactions is, of course, already available and is being used.  It's just not available in English, sorry.  So sorry.  Really.  We're all just so broken up about it not being available for you in English.  Really we are - so very sorry, that is.  tongue

286 (edited by Zarf BeebleBrix 22-Feb-2009 03:24:23)

Re: Resource-based economy

> xeno syndicated wrote:

> "You are seriously arguing that a lack of resources doesn't cause war?  Um... you are just wrong on so many levels."

No.  I'm saying it doesn't have to.



Actually, yes, it does.


Xeno, if you are starving and have absolutely no resources on hand to obtain food, and someone next to you has a shitload of food, yet tells you to go to hell if you offer to trade with them for their food, you only have one option: to load your rifle.



Look, you're no longer even backing up your arguments with justification, so debating here is pretty much pointless unless you are willing to actually explain your arguments, rather than throw out a tiny blurb and expect anyone to give it credence.

Make Eyes Great Again!

The Great Eye is watching you... when there's nothing good on TV...

Re: Resource-based economy

>>I does already work in backwater farming villages, where the majority of the population of the human race live and work. <<

False.

>>We're all just so broken up about it not being available for you in English.  Really we are - so very sorry, that is.<<

How can someone with such a low standard of living in such an empoverished country talk down to Westerners because they have something awesome that they claim Westerners want? You don't make any sense.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: Resource-based economy

"I does already work in backwater farming villages, where the majority of the population of the human race live and work."

I doubt any westerner would want to lower himself to the standards of the rest of the world. And we're being brainwashed? With what, luxury!? Sucks to be us! yikes

Je maintiendrai

289

Re: Resource-based economy

It's alright, really.  No need to convince any of you of anything, really.  It's actually quite amazing how the resource economy works, actually.  But you can keep on being ignorant of it if you want and you can keep on going ahead and thinking you are actually 'developed' (Yes.  Please do everyone a favor and stop developing, will you?). 

You see, when multinationals and other western corporations come into a market and start hiring people, they'll keep hiring the same predictable boring saps they usually hire - those with whimsical morals, jellified spines, etc., and they'll keep producing the kinds of companies that keep #%$-ing over its customers, setting up oligopolies, or undercutting costs by selling the shoddy, garbage-ridden, planned-obsolescent-products you under-educated people in the west keep buying because you DON'T know any better.

It's actually funny how you think you have the free choice to keep buying that trash.   And, ironically, you think you have NO CHOICE but to keep working for these companies, too, NO CHOICE but to keep living your planned-obsolescent lives, buying your planned-obsolescent-cars, planned-obsolescent washing and drying machines,etc. etc., again and again, until you're old, unable to work anymore, and your stove finally konks-out and you starve to death. 

Nice 'developed' society you have there.

Re: Resource-based economy

I think that's another way of him saying, "I give up, I can't answer you guys anymore."

Make Eyes Great Again!

The Great Eye is watching you... when there's nothing good on TV...

Re: Resource-based economy

He said anything else this whole thread?

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

292

Re: Resource-based economy

No, Zarf, I can answer you, I just don't.  Your most recent argument is that cutting trade necessarily leads to war.  But I'm saying it doesn't have to be that way.  Our society is structured in such a way that makes war an inevitability; that ties trade to the occurrence of war.

If our society were structured differently, with no centralized political or financial authority, with domestic production in every country geared towards producing enough goods to ensure their nation's population had their basic needs met, then there would be no need for trade other than or specialty or luxury goods, the cessation of which would NOT lead to war. 

What politician would be able to convince their population of the need to sign up for their nation's military because the Germans aren't trading their Mercedes  anymore?

On an Earth upon which human society provides all of its citizens with the items a - f in the first post of this thread, there would be no need for trade or war.

Don't you see, Zarf? I don't respond, because your arguments aren't relevant.

Re: Resource-based economy

"If our society were structured differently, with no centralized political or financial authority..." Then it would be vulnerable to whatever society had enough centralized authority to organize and impose its will on your society.

"On an Earth upon which human society provides all of its citizens with the items a - f in the first post of this thread..." ON AN EARTH WHERE ALL WORK WAS DONE BY MAGICAL ROBOTS! YES! YES! WE'RE BACK TO THE ROBOTS! OMG THIS IS SO AWESOME!

Stop using so much opium xeno. You're obviously high. You're posting ridiculously ignorant economic theory mixed with modes of production which DO NOT EXIST. You've taken ridiculous and raised it to the imagined power. That's a lot of bullshit.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

294 (edited by xeno syndicated 27-Feb-2009 14:06:38)

Re: Resource-based economy

First, let me say the only reason I would respond to you is because I trust the people who run this forum to retain my anonymity, and not disclose who I am in RL.

That being said, THINK ABOUT IT.

Then, after thinking about that, understand that I am NOT ignorant of the technological capabilities available to humanity.

Understand that we are on a threshold as a species.

Understand that what I am proposing is possible in YOUR lifetime.

Understand that ASSHOLES, out of greed, INhumanity and depravity, who attempt to sabotage the coming change, will be held to account by historians.

Understand that EVERYTHING regarding our economic system is about to change.

Understand it, or, I'm sad to say, be forgotten, ignored, laughed at, despised and ridiculed, forever.

Re: Resource-based economy

Hear, hear, xeno syndicated, master soothsayer and part-time Prophet extraordinaire!

Je maintiendrai

296

Re: Resource-based economy

Hey, it's not my fault I can piece the facts together and you can't.

Re: Resource-based economy

Yes, his country is on the cutting edge of mud huts, HIV (and other STDs in much harsher forms than have made it to the states), and poverty. Clearly he's on the up-and-up concerning economic systems and what will soon be adopted the world over!

Note to IC forum: Don't take angry young children from poor nations too seriously. You'll feel really bad for them.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

298

Re: Resource-based economy

fu

Re: Resource-based economy

i agree with xeno syndicated ...

www.thevenusproject.com

...i..?.r

Re: Resource-based economy

What Xeno is saying is that in dream land where everything is perfect this could work...
   

Something you should know about Imagine Lyrics

Title: John Lennon - Imagine lyrics

Artist: John Lennon Lyrics

Visitors: 547848 visitors have hited Imagine Lyrics since May 27, 2008.
i


Send "Imagine" Ringtone to Cell



Imagine there's no Heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace

You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world

You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one

"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but i am Jesus"
"Nothing is worse than a fully prepared fool"