176 Reply by Undeath (edited by Undeath 27-Mar-2008 16:25:04)

  • Posts: 4,743
  • Tag points: 85

Re: 587 vs 576

> T R3x wrote:

> They are our allies, you should have your allies jump in too then if its that much of a problem!

honestly we are not going to let you take our allies down, we will kick your ass around and show you why we are the top alliance. We are active, been warring all round and deserve the win from our skill levels!



as far as im concerned t rex, that is an admission 576 was not able to fight us by themselves.
=587 victors of 576v587

and if u wish to know y it is not a 2v2, do a check allies on us:)

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,743
  • Tag points: 85

Re: 587 vs 576

and if u will Masse, please proceed to look back at the first 1-3 pages of this thread, and see who needs to stop whining:) only reason u stopped is because u turned the tides on us by calling in the cavalry

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,743
  • Tag points: 85

Re: 587 vs 576

Masse, there was no nap break. allies were welcomed in because u were losing. if it was because of the "nap break" which again did not occur, they would have been in from the beginning

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,743
  • Tag points: 85

Re: 587 vs 576

this thread is done. could a mod close it please?

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,542
  • Tag points: 373

Re: 587 vs 576

Since Undeath opened a new thread that is more accurate (for the time being... tongue) we'll go with that one. Leave this thread of flaming for a slightly newer one!

2011 IC League Fantasy Football Champion
2012 IC League Fantasy Football Runner Up
2013 IC League Fantasy Football Champion

http://www.ic-wiki.com/index.php?title=Gondor

0 Dislike 0 Post Points