No piece of scientific literature that is current, peer reviewed, and accepted among the Environmental Academia denies the existence of global warming. The only debate is over how fast it is happening, what the results will be, and how much humans are to blame.

Don't believe the billions of pages of proof Flint? Check the temperature outside your doorstep everyday for the next 20 years.

So for all this research you've done, it's an oblivious attempt to annoy people on the forums. No one is going to read through all your sources (I doubt even if you took the time to read through each one carefully) and as such, no one will be able to tell you that you misinterpreted a certain peice of data or a conclusion. As such, this huge list of links is irrelevant.

Let's assume you did read each article you have posted above. Did you evaluate each one to see how relevant the information was? A neo-con sitting in his mother's basement apartment writing conspiracy theories about how commies are using global warming to take over the world, is not considered a valid source. And I'm wiling to bet, without even looking that some of these articles are from way back.

"Oh do try, so far I am so far ahead of the competition here, they are completely abandoning global warming and climate change for:

Smog
Pollution"
-Flint

Because clearly, and all experts agree, that smog and pollution do not contribute at all (i.e. 0%) to global warming. The very idea is blasphemous!!!

And Primo, if your reading this, fix the link in my sig please

didnt some russian scientists report findings that we're on the verge of a 100,000 year ice age?

LOL at the super communist Canadian Tire

Dude the number of peer reviewed papers disproving global warming EXCEEDS that saying global warming exists, and furthermore the number of scientists publically against global warming EXCEEDS the number of politicians and scientists who keep saying global warming is real (minus city and local politicians, I mean the ones who put their entire political career on it *cough*al gore*cough* and those who signed the IPCC things.

In fact the VAST MAJORITY agree climate change is NOT MAN MADE and HAPPENS NATURALLY, and CANNOT BE INFLUENCED BY MAN.

My links are but 1% of what I could post. They are extremely valid links. The skeptics here who have tried to bash my previous posts with "intelligent discourse" will be unable to do so when I can adequately point to any link I posted, or hundreds more, with CORRECT EVIDENCE proving to the contrary.

Oh crap I misplaced names, I meant Canadian Tire. Serves me right for being sleepy and posting

"Oh crap I misplaced names, I meant Canadian Tire."

Fair enough. I retract my insults.

No .

"I am proving Global Warming is a FRIGGIN MASSIVE CORRUPT LIE WHICH IS STEALING THE ABILITY TO FOCUS ON SMALL THINGS THAT YOU CAN BITCH ABOUT AWAY FOREVER, DAMAGING THE WORLD FURTHER WITH IT'S LIES AND MAKING YOU AND YOUR NATION POORER FOR NO RESULT!"

Is this gonne make you a millionaire... again?

> Justinian I wrote:

>
You trust Russian scientists?

what does trust have to do with anything?

ur first point is merely a vocabulary discussion
ur second point is basicly the denial of mathematically proven thermodynamic laws, so unless ur a genius i dont think u can point out the flaws?

>> don't care if erosion of the world has been going on for centuries, or even more. The point is that if it continues, the human race will die.<<

...That's the point? Wow. I didn't even know it was true. Wait, I still don't. Erosion is going to destroy mankind? No; it is not.

>> i know nobody who sais global warming is bs
every politician i know is either saying we need to do something about it, <<

Then you need to go out and meet more educated people. "Global warming" is about power, not about the environment. Anyone who a clue in politics is well aware of what's going on. And everyone else? Well you said it; you don't know anyone. Your politicians say this. As long as you're convinced because all your friends are convinced and they're convinced because you're convinced and your politician says you need to elect him because he's convinced and he's the guy who's going to do everything about it, you've got a nice maintained base of power for a politician who can use you for whatever purpose he wants. How enlightened you are.

>>in the last 30 yrs co2 levels have risen by 20%<<

That's fascinating given than man is responsible for what, <2% of it?

There are a lot of you who don't care about the science, the math, and certainly do not want to learn anything about your local beloved politician who's working to create the perfect socialist utopia (which makes you superior to all of us pigs who don't support your righteous, enlightened plan). If politicians are using fear over CO2 to gain your support, you're going to keep embracing them regardless of the truth about their fear-mongering. They mislead you? Oh, well, if what you're saying about C02 doesn't solve world hunger and make delicious nonfat lattes as well, then Al Gore was being honest and what you're saying has no value.

sand worms, duh