WARNING, this post is going to be so danged long, as to defy logic. This is the proofs I have seen, and been wanting to post for a while. Sadly the internet service I was on was browsing only. This one lets me post to

On the bottom you will find probably several hundred links to support my statements. I have been busy finding sources with plenty of evidence and blatantly copying them

Images (If a mod will fix these up, that would be COOL)
Graphs of temperature variations
http://www.michaelcrichton.com/NPC-NewVersion_files/image007.jpg
http://www.daviesand.com/Choices/Precautionary_Planning/New_Data/IceCores1.gif

Pictures of "Temperature reading devices"
http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/images/Marysville_issues2.JPG
http://www.surfacestations.org/images/lovelock_mig480.jpg

Now the talking moment. The world is not over heating, and climate change is a fancy "fix" for those "climatologists" who fear the coming storm that will bury global warming forever.

QUESTION:
Can you name 3 deserts that used to be the bread baskets of the world? You earn an F if you cannot. Feel free to google it, this is an open book test!

Fact is that the climate has been changing for a long long time on Earth. In fact this change goes back to even the formation of Earth. The air back then, I am assured, had much more heavy metals, phosphorous, and other nasty things in it than it does now. However lets just use the habitable period of time on Earth. During that time we have experienced many full blown ice ages and many severely hot periods.

The global warming crowd is a bunch environmentalists with an agenda (not friendly to humanity) of scientists who want to get rich from panic, politicians who want to get more money to the government and/or have more power over others, media hyping to help the people they wish to elect as well as to make a story to scare people with, and ignorant people like yourself (if you believed in it).

The computer models these people made were their only evidence of strength, with a few papers here and there to try to back it up. However the vast majority of evidence went against them. To fight this they empaneled a bunch of politicians with the few scientists who desired this 'disaster' and proclaimed it truth on the spot, with no one disagreeing.

They were never correct on that, or on the global warming.

Indeed the scientists who have been correct know the true source of heating and lack thereof. The sun. The power of this star is so much, it dictates our temperatures. The method this works is several fold. The sun spots push the electromagnetic sphere around the sun further. This electromagnetic sphere repels cosmic radiation. Cosmic Radiation binds water molecules into clouds. The clouds cool and wet the earth. The cooling is obtained via reflecting the sun's rays back out of the atmosphere earlier than not.

The correct scientists warned of this cooling period. They were correct. Global warming "experts" warned of a Artic Ice Cap melt, a 100% melt. They were wrong. The correct scientists said a wet winter last year and this year. They are correct. The global warming 'experts' warned of droughts everywhere. They were incorrect.

4 years ago the term "climate change" was pushed hard by those leading the agenda, when they realized the truth was escaping them. Climate change was ushered in as the 'correct science' and was needing 'cash for researching the dire effects of climate change'. However there has been science contradicting their claims. At first, since the established source for information... the media... was lying, they controlled the knowledge of the vast majority. However they forgot the internet. At first it was a jumbled, uncoordinated set of 'thats odd' statements. It grew to outrage and minor coordination of information when they realized we were being duped. Now it is heading to a huge ground swell which will shake the foundation of modern politics, and perhaps cause the downfall of many people for going along with the duping of society.

Data showed that some icebergs were shrinking, some stable, and some were growing. However environmentalists, the only ones really doing the examination of these glaciers only reported the shrinking and hid/supressed records of growing glaciers. Indeed some of these records are quite clearly doctored as well. Additionally when reports of a glacier growing came out they would point to a half dozen to dozen glaciers they were seeing shrinking and shout "THEY ARE ALL SHRINKING". Fear and yelling gets environmentalists far you see.

These environmentalists also claimed a record number of ice bergs had suddenly started with the 'global warming'. However the truth is much more simpler. You see prior to the fears of global warming no nation was putting out the cash to track ice bergs that presented no threat to shipping. This meant vast areas of the antarctic circle were not being monitored, as well as some regions of the artic circle. However the hysteria made funding available on an unlimited credit card for environmentalists, who went on a spending spree. One of the things they purchased was 100% tracking of all, yes all... even the ones smaller than a SUV... glaciers around the world. What a spike they got as well.

The environmentalists went on to make claims of water rising around the world. Some area's actually did have water levels rise, while some had levels drop. No scientist has been able to explain in full the reason for the different results, but tidal forces are commonly accepted as the culprit, as well as warming/cooling trends, el nina, el nino, and the likes. In fact in old Europe there was a time when flooding pushed all coastal area's deep inland. However no such flooding occurred in China, lower Africa, or other regions during that time period. It was a regional effect of unique proportions.

Environmentalists have tried to claim tidal flow changes will occur. They use fancy computer models. The first changes should have happened already. No such changes have occurred. Run backwards they show a dramatic series of changes that never occurred. In other words their models do not show reality and do not account for many many factors.

CO2 has been shown to be beneficial to earth, not hostile. In fact if it were not for this gas then nothing would live on Earth. Except some real unique fungus and molds I guess, and the aquatic stuff. In fact the difference is so small, spread on a football field, statistically, we are talking the last few inches of the field. They ignore other gases, like nitrogen, oxygen, and the likes, to focus on one gas in particular. After all one gas makes good news print, trying to define all gases is above the IQ of a news reporter.

The North Pole was supposed to have a 50% chance of 100% melting. Surprisingly this melt did not occur. Oh a thinning did happen, but then suddenly the ice pack grew to the same level as in the 70's. If there is a 50% chance of 100% result, you would think there is a 75% chance of a 75% melt, or some such formula as well. Guess it was a 50% chance of full growth or 50% chance of a complete melt? Can they quit flipping a coin to determine the future weather and at least get a dart board?

Then came the claim that the polar bear will die off. Geez... the polar bear is at the highest record levels ever recorded over the last 100 years. 25,000. They are stable at their current numbers, and are not in danger of dying off. In fact a trivia fact. How long does a female polar bear NOT EAT. Answer: 9 months if pregnant.

The fact is that the entire agenda is one of money, power, control, manipulation, fear mongering, super radical environmentalism gone wild, and idiots passing it off as truth without looking in depth at the truth.

The nails are being placed against the coffin of Global Warming, and against Man Made Climate Change. Learn more if you wish, information is below. LOTS OF INFORMATION. Credit to Popular Technology for the vast majority of this work.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? - it