Re: Elimination: Religious Groups (& Atheism)
satan in satanism and satan in the "i reject satan" are two different satans.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → General → Elimination: Religious Groups (& Atheism)
satan in satanism and satan in the "i reject satan" are two different satans.
> coffeeking wrote:
> now fokker, i will not pretend to know anything about satanism to any degree.
however, i know for a fact that traditional baptismal vows include "i reject satan"
i dare say there is a conflict somewhere<
Lesson number one:
Satanists do not believe in a literal Satan/Devil.
fokker, i think you mean satanism doesnt beleive in a literal Devil; if satanists dont beleive in one, then many religions couldnt also be satanist because of their beleif in a literal devil.
Those are Devil Worshippers, not Satanists.
i think lloyd needs a good cuppa tea
(or moce to forums more of his own intellectual standard;p)
so, out of my own curiousity, what do satanists believe?
fokker, i think you misread my last post, which is probably mostly my fault. if satanists cant beleive in a literal devil, then every religion where there is a beleif in a literal devil wouldnt be able to become satanist along with that religion.
for example, many christian religions beleive in a literal devil; if satanists dont beleive in a literal devil, a satanist couldnt be that christian religion. but if the religion of satanism doesnt beleive in a literal devil, but the lack of a devil isnt a dogma that satanists must beleive, then the religions would be compatible.
It's hard to say without going into exessive, and boring, detail.
Here's a good starting point:
The Rules:
http://www.churchofsatan.com/Pages/Eleven.html
The Statements
http://www.churchofsatan.com/Pages/NineStatements.html
The Sins:
http://www.churchofsatan.com/Pages/Sins.html
> avogadro wrote:
>not anymore different then the different sects of islam and then theres large non-religious groups that are way more different from each other then different sects of christianity; but only one was given for all non-religious people to vote for.
Islam's different sects aren't as different as sects of christianity, they're actually not different at all
i'm taking world religions right now, the most different are sunnis and shiah
the difference: shiah grief on this one day of the year for the lost of a prophet[not sure if he was a prophet] but sunnis don't grief as much
, and the praying style is a bit different, but basically comes down to the same point
not too different really ![]()
![]()
Judaism - 6
Buddhism - 21
Hinduism - 12
Sikhism - 10
Taoism - 21
Shinto - 9
Bah
for the record, you're all nuts...except for Eltie who is God and Alch who is his right hand and enforcer
> avogadro wrote:
> fokker, i think you misread my last post, which is probably mostly my fault. if satanists cant beleive in a literal devil, then every religion where there is a beleif in a literal devil wouldnt be able to become satanist along with that religion.
for example, many christian religions beleive in a literal devil; if satanists dont beleive in a literal devil, a satanist couldnt be that christian religion. but if the religion of satanism doesnt beleive in a literal devil, but the lack of a devil isnt a dogma that satanists must beleive, then the religions would be compatible.<
With you now ![]()
Although I have heard of people who are half and half (never met one personally) all of the Satanists I have met seem to hold the belief that in order to be a true Satanist one must absolutely not believe in a Devil.
Tomayto Tomahto I guess.
You're all fools pretaining to Satanism. I just can't stand reading all this horrid misinformation. Satanism was a construct of the Catholic church in relation to those in the old times that believed in Science. Scientists were considered Devil Worshipers, and what was Satans real name? Lucifer, which means 'The Bringer Of Light'. Any form of 'Satanism' today is just an idiot's joke. Devil worshipers today are just a sub-sect of christianity, and only of christianity because that is the only Abrahamic faith that supports all their ideals. Stop trying to shove your flawed and incomplete views on other people, and read a goram book every once in a while.
Judaism - 6
Buddhism - 21
Hinduism - 12
Sikhism - 10
Taoism - 21
Shinto - 9
Bah
Judaism - 6
Buddhism - 20
Hinduism - 12
Sikhism - 11
Taoism - 21
Shinto - 9
Bah
Someone ought to do a P vs C on these religions:
Taoism - 21
Good strong religion, strong dogma and been dominating this round. Only religion that can pose a threat is their ally Buddhism. Contender!
Satanism - 10
Had a decent start, seemed to be going places but made too many enemies. Looks like it will be curtains soon for Beelzebub's buddies. Definitely pretenders
Anyone? I'm lazy! ![]()
Judaism - 5
Buddhism - 20
Hinduism - 12
Sikhism - 11
Taoism - 21
Shinto - 9
Bah
"But now comes your mistake. You argue that the only thing in common for atheists is the belief in the non-existance of god and that therefore they are not religious. To me it seems like they are religious, although only on a very low level (the level where you agree with that one "rule"/statement) so they DEFINATELY dont belong to non-religious. If you're not non-religious (absence of religious beliefs), you must be religious (existance of any amount of religious belief)."
well, there would be two different ways i could take this argument if we were in the politics forum. 1. i could debate the meaning of the word religious and whether a simple belief in a lack of God would be enough to qualify someone as religious and how people in todays' world and the known imperfectness of our senses make leaps of faith in life no matter their religion on topics other then religion and that simply believing or not believing in a God is no more religious then believing theirs really a monitor infront of you; or i could point out how the non-religious group is such a minority that their view of religious and atheism doesnt matter because the vast majority would view atheism as non-religious when comparing it to themselves and simply because you are at the extremes of a comparison, doesnt change other faith's place in the comparison.
taht was by far and away the most terrible run-on sentence i have ever read avogadro.
unfortunately, your claim that the majority say atheism is not religious is not true. proven in its simplest form by the fact that you are the only one saying so.
atheism is based upon BELIEFS and not facts, therefore a religion. argument OVER
"
unfortunately, your claim that the majority say atheism is not religious is not true. proven in its simplest form by the fact that you are the only one saying so."
in a comparison to people of all religions, atheists are on the non-religious fringe, so are non-religious.
"
atheism is based upon BELIEFS and not facts, therefore a religion. argument OVER"
that was never the argument. atheism is a religion, and guess what, agnostics are part of a religion too.
oh and i love run on sentences, periods are Nazis ![]()
Judaism - 6
Buddhism - 20
Hinduism - 12
Sikhism - 11
Taoism - 21
Shinto - 9
Bah
Judaism - 6
Buddhism - 21
Hinduism - 12
Sikhism - 11
Taoism - 21
Shinto - 9
Bah
no avogadro, agnostics are not part of a religion.
the 4 schools of thinking, historical, religious, philosophical, and skeptic
note agnostic falls under skeptic
we state that we cannot know or believe in any greater power because it is simply beyond human understanding (if it exists). not only that but religions are supposed to have gatherings as well (also found in webster's definition). Agnostics to not do this
Judaism - 7
Buddhism - 21
Hinduism - 12
Sikhism - 11
Taoism - 21
Shinto - 9
Bah
Judaism - 7
Buddhism - 21
Hinduism - 12
Sikhism - 11
Taoism - 22
Shinto - 9
Bah
Imperial Forum → General → Elimination: Religious Groups (& Atheism)
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.