Re: 1431/1441 vs 1427/1426
27 had = savings as us and u were not too far behind 41 in savings, when have u ever seen any war where all 4 fams had equal savings?
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 1431/1441 vs 1427/1426
27 had = savings as us and u were not too far behind 41 in savings, when have u ever seen any war where all 4 fams had equal savings?
doesn't have to be. As long as they have a chance.
u did have a chance, I mean no disrespect to 27, but they chose not to go offensive against our attackers and that was your chance gone right there.
i think a big reason that we lost was because we counted 41 out of it completely
i dont even think we had their yama
my only question is this...why would you count out last rounds winner? we dominated in good fashion last round and have been lazy this round and still top 5 in size almost all round long. i know wut you say is true...u did underestimate 41 but you shouldnt have
individual skill wise 41 is very average at best, however they have the determination/organization/activity and worked very well as a unit which is a formula for a winning fam.
individual skill wise 41 is very average at best,
lmao
tbh 41 after bout 4 weeks had no determination, no organization, and no activity, it was the skill that got us where we are cause as a fam this round we were bout 25% as organized, active, and determined as last round
Going into any war u take both fams serious. I think we were ignoring 26, but we were still rdy and right away orbit/kagar went on tobi+ shananon from 27. Kagar had a hard time due to lack of figs, but he was very active. 27 were hiding their fleets and losing portals with 1k ground, so they let our 4m resource banker take portals from 10m nw attacker and 20m nw attacker while they did other things with 26.. I dont want what 41 did last round, not having their yama and being rdy to clear all attackers is beyond huge mistake. We allied 41 this round knowing their infra would be weak, but knowing they werent afraid to war anyone and knowing they actually attacked and dident hang out in core like so many top fams did last round. last round was truely boring and pathetic with most of the top fams. If i was an outside fam I would of had p lists of all their attackers and be rdy for ws/hydrop and tymo till I found out who came out as the main guy..
In anycase its over and i do believe majority of the players had alot of fun, it appears that our attackers and 41's 2 main guys had alot of fun for our 1st and only alliance war this round.
well we couldn't beat 31 fleets without 27 and they failed that. after that war was over. ![]()
amazing 26 still have the moral to attack small fam
they are doing the thing that 1417 do.take from A pass to B. ![]()
buenl you mean 1444 ? they are napbreakers, can't say I care impire attacks them.
hehehehe okay, didnt know that
.
hello differant:), long time:) u were 1 of our great randoms in tri yrs ago
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 1431/1441 vs 1427/1426
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.