what starts with F, ends in K, and has UC in the middle?
.....
....
...
..
.
I got it!!! It's FIRETRUCK!!!
Is that the answer WS?

"Gilligan
Forum Moderator
Re: 1446 vs 1424And even though i also don't know what pp is trying to say

it doesn't matter, regardless of what you guys say, regardless of how many fams you have been at war with, we are currently 16 ranks below you and at war.

the second one alone is a good reason to call you gut-less with the timing of the nap cancelation"

I apologize I was using my phone and its hard to type.. I b asically said we dont need to win or lose the round by canceling nap on u guys. We were already 200 planets in 1st.

also u were not 16 ranks below us, I get tired of everyone using the lowest of the 3 rankings to make things look good as they chose.

we were 1st in size and u were 6th in size, this is a large part of what considers who wins at eor and those u were almost top 5 and u were top 6 and thus a fine target.

Our guys dont go around reading uni news and since joe/kagar chose the target they did not know about u waring 24, especially since 51/24 were in our fam news heavly and alot of people claim small skimishes as wars.

COnversation with our 2 main attackers could of solved some problems, instead u chose to break nap and claim its #2 vs #16.

Which also id like to say were around 4th in nw, so your using the crappy scoring system which is flawed.

In anycase plz dont flame me, im not here to argue, nor am I an attacker. Have a nice day

Gilligan did u read what i posted in the other thread?

I dont think joe/kagar would of canceled on u guys if u didn't piss us off earlier in round.

Considering that 34 posted 34/27 vs 31 in uni news and u guys still hit us hard+ 1415 did. Any war u got into later on meant 0 to our guys. Its like when 37 used a 7k nw camaar to infiltrate our core. They cant sit there adn bitch about 41 doing it to them when they did it to us.

U had mainly 2 or 3 attackers if i recall just suicide on our banker p's back then while there was a declared war in uni news+ we had 1415 raiding our core also.

Lesser fams would of been screwed, we dealt with it and came out stronger and with alot more p's cause of it. Sure our nw rank at that time fell to 7th, but the foundation for infra+ active attackers came out of all of it.

If u would of talked to us, not raid our core or did something more respectful back then, then maybe our 2 guys would of cared?

So this is the time of the round where u got to worry about every fam and atm there are alot of fams sitting in core infra whoring while we are waring, so our infra is alot less atm then our nw rank shows due to plenty of units. Shall we sit here and have these other fams war us and worry about u guys? u did war us while u ignored the uni news war also earlier in round, Well we said no. we will remove u as a threat before u try to later.

Not to mention u have been following our attackers around the gal and not to mention 1 of your main attackers clearly stated he does not see naps as ways to sit, save and then war. he sees them as ways to stop attacking till he is rdy to then hit.

No I think given all the info and lack of respect u have showed us earlier in round and recently that we did the best thing for our fam and cancel on u.

I have no doubt that most of your fam did not agree with others in your fam and that most of u are paying the price because of them. This happens all the time and its a shame, however if given the choice, I would rather u be on the wrong side of the fence then I on the wrong side.

I know this would of been over by now and u guys would have alot more infra/size if u did not break nap, but now these guys will make u pay and nothing i say to them to have mercy on u will mean anything since r attackers are now known as not trustable.

Again if u did not treat us the way u did earlier in round, I would say u had a good arguement to break nap, but due to how u guys were earlier in round u dont.

sorry

I seen the msgs u swaped with daniel before. U appologized for hitting our core and said your attackers werent suppose to go past a certain line, but they did+ were raiding 1 banker and 2 resource bankers of us. I wont go futhur into this as I dont want to argue here and I already spoke to much.

U got a good fam, just did not play the smartest+ u got alot of untrustable players in r fam

err?

colorado u were attacjking ouir bankers 1 tick from our hs:), u were attacking us while 34/27 declared war on us in uni news and u were attacking us while we had to deal with 1415 also.

best spots in the gal? hmn thats half true, however we got 45 like 8 ticks hs to hs from us whcih they were #1 till we hit them and ironic enough there #2 in nw atm. We got 27 right below us who are maybe 11 ticks hs to hs? there #3 in nw atm. u guys were to our left and  u guys been top 12. 32 not too far above us who we had alot of problems with earlier, 40 to our right as well as 15, but we crushed 15. 34 was 4th in nw when we had problem with them and there not that much furthur.

There is a reason why we been waring all round, heck peeps tried keeping us in our core.

Comparing our spot to yours i see no differance other then were bigger then u and have dealt with our area better then u have dealt with yours. I dont think u can compare 24/51 to 45/27??? not evan close cause we rumbled with 24/51 also