Topic: 1455 vs. 1418

War has started from week 13, 13 between our two families.

Keep it clean and other fams please be considerate. Thank you and good luck to both families.

2 (edited by Elbe 14-Nov-2008 12:28:11)

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

A little statistical analysis on 1418 from the last ticks;

LEEDS LEEDS LEEDS      Revalons              0.00    0
ABEL TURNER     BIGGA THAN YO AVG             -19538.00    -4
JULES WINNFIELD     The Professors             0.00    0
LAZARUS WOODS     Quantam             -230262.00    -22
MACE WINDU     ThunderCats of HATE             -162261.00    -8
Memega     Camaar             36.00    0
DragonWorldX     XdragonX             2011.00    0
BrutalBeach     Revalons             1234.00    0
doodle     Nobshitycocarsus             0.00    0
skunk     Revalons             9.00    0
Whasa     Camaar             0.00    0

Leeds and Jules seem to have gone on a vacation to the Bahams, leaving Gary the Great with a great big fleet and no way of paying for it. Really is a shame because we have a massive amount of shares with Leeds and Jules, so we'll see you boys in 7 days time. Until then poor Lazarus and Mace will just have to keep us company, and Gary, but we're predicting he'll delete soon.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

Ohhhhh snap! I love the smell of napalm in the morning!!!!

The Great Chupacubra has spoken!!! Now bow before me and beg for mercy!!!

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

hehehehehehe me too! i love the smell of fig running like 6 of your players;D i love these 13 v 1s big_smile

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

We can always rebuild those fighters, who's going to fund your fleet with Leeds and Jules in v-mode and Lazarus in p-mode? We're in this for the long haul, are you?

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

Elbe...We won our first war, and gave you guys a chance, this is how you repay us our kindness. You violated our NAP by exploring into our cores with tiny camaars..  Good job playing the "righteous aggressor". You've got had 12 active players, and allies we have 4 players and none.. Good job to the 3v1. Maintain that viligiance sweetie, cuz it might come from some higher ranked family, who feels your the juicy target.

Anyhow, I went into vacation mode well before the start of our war, as I have too much on my plate this week to play IC. I'd be happy to obligue you a war when I return. (yes, I know, 1vs12 by then I'm sure, and maybe 2vs12 if Leeds is back by then too.)

Tootles til then!

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

indeed, im waiting for people in their fam to come here and say "oh well you broke terms by being in our cores"..to which ill explain once, and once only as it seems 1455 doesnt care to hear it as they know they're wrong...


when nap was initially made we agreed to swap out of each others cores, the following day i talked to 55's leader about just sharing the systems we fought over and then staying out of each other's cores, to which he agreed. then he has all of his attackers explore into our core when we have deletes using the excuse "oh well u didnt swap out when u said u would", even though we had agreed otherwise. but hey, some people will do anything to "try" to win, and 1455's true character is showing now. for which they had a huge jump in fleet for and arent up much for lol

8 (edited by Elbe 14-Nov-2008 16:04:02)

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

> Nai wrote:

> Elbe...We won our first war, and gave you guys a chance, this is how you repay us our kindness.

If I remember correctly it wasn't a war. You had your small players explore into our core systems, portal up and raid one of our bankers.


You violated our NAP by exploring into our cores with tiny camaars..  Good job playing the "righteous aggressor".

Cores were never set up, "sharing space" with a player like Gary (who attacked one tick before the NAP oficially ended and the likes of Neville Flynn was never going to happen). We just simply returned the favour of exploring back into your core areas

You've got had 12 active players, and allies we have 4 players and none.. Good job to the 3v1. Maintain that viligiance sweetie, cuz it might come from some higher ranked family, who feels your the juicy target.

3 v 1? It's one on one at the moment, not our fault Gary drove your family to delete...

Anyhow, I went into vacation mode well before the start of our war, as I have too much on my plate this week to play IC. I'd be happy to obligue you a war when I return. (yes, I know, 1vs12 by then I'm sure, and maybe 2vs12 if Leeds is back by then too.)

Tootles til then!

We were considering the p-nap offer Gary made until Lazarus decided to nuke us, even though we still had an official NAP. What goes around comes around, especially when Gary responds to messages with non-sensical gibberish like "Do you talk for the trees" your own fault for playing with such a tard Nai tongue

See you in 7 days. tongue

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

"Week 17, 12

I am hereby giving you notice and cancelling our NAP, as stated in the NAP conditions after this notice has been given there will be 48hours until the NAP will be removed.

Signed, Svarto of BabyBoom (1455)"

Last time i checked, waiting until Week 13, year 13 isn't attacking early.

And are you really using the excuse that I asked you "Do you talk for the trees" as an excuse for your dishonorable ways? I thought it was funny, as would most people.

Oh yeah, meanwhile you send me messages like...


Week 38, 12

All your base will belong to us.

Signed, grumf of Lorax (1455)

Thats what I thought.


So I guess its alright for you to send people messages like  that but not for them? LOL. And I guess you never learned how to count.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

Again, spin. Bah. I respect ya too much Elbe to haggle. Too busy to anyways. Bottomline, Ur taking advantage of a family that gave you guys a chance. Good job. Bravo. Well done.


PS - And apparently by your own admission your family willingly violated the NAP accords we made in good faith with you guys and explored with your camaars too small for us to clear, "just becuase gary was there" even though the agreement was made with "nolio" is just lame lame lame... lame as it comes. lame.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

11 (edited by Elbe 14-Nov-2008 16:16:12)

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

I whisper to the wind.

I like you too Nai tongue Had I of known you were in the family I would have told them to accept Gary's p-nap offer. Good thing Genesis  & Oxygen aren't in our family, they would have us attacking our old allies too

Message from our Leader
WAS HAS STARTED! 1418 ATTACKED ONE TICK TO EARLY (surprise?)

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

Oh now you have nothing to say lorax? Like how you dont know how to count 48 ticks, and how your fam broke NAP and is trying to take advantage of us? Right...thats what i thought.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

Gary, technically you didn't nullify any terms by being in our cores. Babyboom asked for swap-outs and by what he told us, you said no. So technically there was no cores agreement, and there was no terms for you to crap on.

Yes, a few of us explored into your cores, I didn't, I attacked a family in what i thought wasn't your core, as it only had one planet explored at that moment, and if you have my planet list (which I bet you do) you'll see I'm nowhere near most of your core systems. But, what's fair is fair, and how come you're allowed to be in someone else's core, when we're not. Who give you the right? Yes you attacked in, but you attacked us, and we didn't attack you and waste your money in infra to get what little shares we have in your core.

Oh, and btw. Only way we got in was because of all those deleters you had, remember those? Remember all those players who DON'T like you and didn't want to work as a team with you, oh amazing leader? I also love how your bankers left you to rot with a massive fleet. It shows you what they think of you and this war. You're going to lose, and in seven days, we'll rape your bankers the tick they're out of v-mode, because we'll be watching, and waiting. And then, when they delete, and leave you all alone with you 50 planets and no friends, we'll ask for 49 planets for a p-nap.

You forget that we have the gift of bankers. We'll out-jump you, one by one, and when all of us are twice your networth, and your bankers are still watching from the outside. Ha.

Remember, you don't get resources in v-mode. So all they had is what they'll have in 7 days.

Please disregard the post above, the person who typed it is mentally insane and has three heads. Yes, three.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

even though the agreement was made with "nolio" is just lame lame lame... lame as it comes. lame.

Just to clear this up. I never talked to Nolio, the agreement was made with Gary.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

Well whoever it was, your family members are calling out how lame they are, yet your the one that broke your word. Good job, bravo.

And you might think that cuz big gary is there he'd be wanting to attack you guys first, and disregard the NAP you guys were in default on. I can tell you now, he had no intentions. And despite his supposed reputation or bravado with some people, he doesn't rub me the wrong way at all. He only desires what is best for the family. Activity and unity being foremost. He's just a little rough and immature around the edges. You gotta be wise enough to see through that.

Anyhow, I have meetings the rest of the day.. cya guys.. Hope you cool ur heels guys, and realize that there is no win-win for either of us. Bragging rights are forfiet now. The bell has tolled. Someone larger than both of us combined will come along and snag up these planets eventually anyhow, so lets not get to the point we're just down and out and bitter about this round, there is ample opportunity to get past this for both of us.

Later.. cya next week.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

Did anyone from 1455 bother to count 48 ticks? Or do you all just like to jump on the bandwagon and copy what one idiot in your family says? I have NEVER broken a NAP and NEVER will. And as far as the planets in your cores..per the agreement we said that the systems we were fighting over were to be shared.

"Gary, technically you didn't nullify any terms by being in our cores. Babyboom asked for swap-outs and by what he told us, you said no. So technically there was no cores agreement, and there was no terms for you to crap on."

I talked to him after we agreed to swap out, and we agreed to share the systems we were fighting over and stay out of each others cores except for those systems. I'm glad you'll use any excuse you can to hit a family that cant put up much of a fight...all i can say is that im going to put up a fight the likes youve never seen my friend. You guys arent faring well considering how many people you have backing you up....hope it feels good knowing if my family was in top 10, your family would have been crushed to peices by now.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

and i love this line..

"You forget that we have the gift of bankers. We'll out-jump you, one by one, and when all of us are twice your networth, and your bankers are still watching from the outside. Ha."

Ha. Ha. Ha. Not sure if you realized but you ARE twice our NW. Youre fighting a family ranked 12 ranks below you.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

I hate long meetings... just had to stick my nose in for a sec..

Elbe - FYI, hun, the cores were set up, we have the list of cores signed off by you guys in our forums...

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

Oh, btw, I just read what Horton has to say, it's craptacular talk and acting like that I despise in this game.

Word to the wise.... you reap what you sow.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

update?

[22:11]    <Primo>    WHO SAID I AM ACTIVE? X( X(

Is that a NAP I saw you make? Time to break it!

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

It appears as if 1418 thought differently about this NAP than we did... our leaders obviously gave us different repoorts back...

We got "we are going to swap out of cores then NAP," then "their leader doesn't want to swap anymore, what do you think" to which we all replied "hell no, solid cores or no nap and we remove them by force." To which we were getting around too even though it took a few days during which  we assumed more discusions were continuing... they obviously fell down with nap cancellation (which from our point of view was nice since as far as we were aware the nap was void due to the cores not being set up correctly.) There was an attempt by 1418 to rectify the suituation with a P-NAP but obviously that didn't work either, mostly because what we wanted as a fam was solid cores.

It appears what 1418 was told differs, mostly over these shared systems and that they were in fact agreed too, which if is correct was a) a mistake by our leader to do so and b) another mistkae not to tell us that they were in fact agreed, not in discussion. However if what we were told is actually correct, then Gary is either being a n00b and not recogniziong difference between accepting a term and still negotiating.

However it is now obvious why there is a war here because there has been mis-understanding in the past about what was agreed too and what was not...

In all honesty even tninking we would agree to the shared systems as they were was silly, most were deep in our core, some were probably understandable, but others required a swap out, esp with only a 48hr nap. (Also case in point I was against the orginal NAP being discussed.)

"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but i am Jesus"
"Nothing is worse than a fully prepared fool"

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

You fool, along with Elbe, I have great respect for. So please understand what I've posted here as documented fact. It's not he-said/she-said material.

1. Core NAP's were agreed to, we have signed copy in our forums. Your being misled about this truth irregardless of whether it was intentional or not by your leader. If Gary seems noob here, he certainly documented the fact well enough to us.

2. Your family, via admission in a number of the above posts confirmed that members of 1455 willinging violated the covenents that were established. I am not going to pass judgement on you for this. Typically it's rather frowned upon as a NAP break.

3. We offerred you NAP form our first skirmish, and have respected you and your family, when we could have been much more hard core and really put a hurt on you. We now are down, due to deletions, and your right there to smack us down with some wonderful posts (refer to hortons post above). If we wanted to at that time,  When we took that NAP at the beginning, by your own admission, we were deep within your cores; we could easily have nailed you guys and yet we didn't. - So, despite us having some personalities deemed "tyranical", we took the high ground here. Frankly, if  you'd not accepted the NAP then (the one you were opposed to), you'd not be in the situation your at now, you'd be far worse off I'm sure. As we would have had to press harder to get an NAP outta you guys.

Anyhow.. I dont have much free time.. a few minutes to make posts like this.. I'll check in tomorrow if I can. Cya bud!

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

I respect you too Nai, but I dissagree that we would of been worse off if we hadn't accepted that first NAP, though it is my oppinion. I beleive the timing was right by your fam, you had made all the material gains you were likely too, if it went on any longer I saw us doing better and kicking you out, we had gained momentum and were starting to actually get organised.


ANyway it is all theoritical.... war is on now...

"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but i am Jesus"
"Nothing is worse than a fully prepared fool"

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

The best family will win!

GL

Greetz Joene

Re: 1455 vs. 1418

the best family will win?  LOL