Sodomy: Usually defined as penetration of the mouth or anus.

Means when sodomy is banned, it means all penetrations of those sites are banned/illegal. Usually, the law is intended to limit homosexual activity. But, it also limits heterosexual activities.

It is usuallly not limited to just the penis as the object used. It also includes vibrators, dildos, and fingers.

Eh, so you cant get a blowjob from your (consenting adult, mentally competent) wife without violating the law? You cant have anal sex with her, even if she loves it? you cant let her suck on your finger? Or finger her anus, while you have sex?

Jeese get the gov outa our bedrooms.

> A10 wrote:

> Libertarians are (in the US anyways) near anarchists. They oppose all government programs except for a small military. This means no CIA no FBI and very very very relaxed laws that don't limit people (like legalizing pot) etc . . .

Eh, I disagree. Libertarians see the need for some government. Anarchist see the need for NO government.

libertarisimsitsismers are anachists without balls.... if you are going to drop some laws because the govt shouldn't play nanny, why not drop them all??

Hummy you seem to have a weird view of animal husbandry, to get good traits you breed two animals with the smae trait who are not closely related or else you start getting defects. It is one of the more complicated requirements of a farm is to work out which male can go in what heard of females....

I see that you're still getting stupid posts after correcting a democrat/socialist who called himself a libertarian.

No need to correct the first line of You_Fool's post. It's too dumb.

and what is the difference? Why is one law higher than any other? What makes you so enlightened that you can say "this law here is ok, but this one is not?"

In any case (ignoring my own post in moving on) who is to sawy that without a govt there would eb no laws? If killing someone is so inherantly wrong that we need a law against it passed down from the "government" why can we not support such laws qithout being told about it from above?

Libertarians seem to think government is bad and that people can run their own lives, excpet for some places where its important that government steps in... why? IF government is too inefficent to run schools/hospitals/whatever why is it efficient enough to run a miltary/policeforce/whatever?

Of course ii asm being a little biased as i am used to more right wing libertarians than left wing ones...

As I say I ma too used to right wing libertarians who claim efficiency as their arguments for their views...

In any case you didn't answer the question - why do we need government to tell us what laws are required and which are not? Why can we not decide that ourselves? The idea of the court system is to be tried by your peers anyway, so why do they need to be told what is right and wrong, why can they not listen to both sides and decide who is in the right and who is in the wrong...

Maybe we raise our animals a little different here.... Inbreeding doesn't bring out good traits in the long run...

> You_Fool wrote:

> As I say I ma too used to right wing libertarians who claim efficiency as their arguments for their views...

In any case you didn't answer the question - why do we need government to tell us what laws are required and which are not? Why can we not decide that ourselves? The idea of the court system is to be tried by your peers anyway, so why do they need to be told what is right and wrong, why can they not listen to both sides and decide who is in the right and who is in the wrong...

Hehe, You Fool, you are a closet libertarian. YES! Why must we be told what laws are required? WHY CAN'T we decide for ourselves?

"In any case you didn't answer the question - why do we need government to tell us what laws are required and which are not? Why can we not decide that ourselves? The idea of the court system is to be tried by your peers anyway, so why do they need to be told what is right and wrong, why can they not listen to both sides and decide who is in the right and who is in the wrong..."

first of all, i answered the question i quoted. 2nd how are they gonna pick who to be tried if you dont have police to investigate and arrest? 3rd laws provide a guideline. if there were no laws how would people get arrested and how would you know what not to do inorder to avoid getting arrested?

Lol

In your country, you are as respected for picking up lard as an educated person?

Say what you want, that's why you are not in charge. Though I'm sure they tell you you are very valuable, you are appreciated. I'm glad that's enough to make you feel warm inside. But it doesn't make for an educated voice.

kemp, you speak as if you have a brain, but I see you don't... it is a pity.... but meh...