Re: The Presidential Debate II

BC Cougar wrote:

my point is that anyone that is a dem or rep, isn't going to do a damn thing to help the common person, they never have and never will.... we need a strong new political party to take over.... and not some socialist scum that just wants a free ride on everyone else's back, put out or get out, if you don't want to work for what you get then move to Canada.

Ummmm there's nothing wrong with helping the next generation and the next generation build for...the next generation.

Working for what you get is perfectly fine. But things happen in life that puts ppl in less fortunate situations. Hmmmm kinda like economic crisis's where people lose their jobs and they have no way to feed their families and ultimately become homeless. Some of us are in comfortable situations. A good portion of America isn't and it'll always continue like that. You don't build a strong nation by allowing the future generation to grow off of nothing.

It's just like in IC. How can you possibly allow your family to grow if the noobs who log in never receive aid? It's just... not so common sense =p

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: The Presidential Debate II

Right, listen to Nolio.

The goal is to invest in other people, not provide and pamper them.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

i agree with you Spidermanbearpig, but socialism, leads to even greater separation of rich and poor, we need to ratify the constitution again at a literal basis, so that the states take over powers of local laws, and the feds only deal with armed robbery, murder, kidnapping, and illegal imports.
that way the states can determine for themselves what is civil liberties and the fed can only deal with crimes against others.
most of the new generation are seeing the intelligence of the original constitution, and starting to understand that not only are we being violated of our own civil rights our country has decided that they should do the same to others.
that is not right on sooooo many levels.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

No system is perfect. I love the idea of communism but it's impossible to execute =p

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: The Presidential Debate II

> Spidermanbearpig wrote:

> No system is perfect. I love the idea of communism but it's impossible to execute =p

idd sad

Re: The Presidential Debate II

who won the debate?

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: The Presidential Debate II

what you just said Inviltrist is not going to happen.  even under todays system people can leach off of the government.  I was working at a sign shop three years ago and the owner was a great man.  There was a man that he had met who was going through hard times with debt and unemployment.  so my boss offered him a job.  The man refused it because if he took the job he would lose his government aid.  to me that is bullshit and to think anyone is going to be successful in changing that loop and ending leaching is wrong.

@ justinian

dude why are you going to vote for Obama? from what iv read about you through your posts you are mostly conservative. This cant be about "bipartisanship" and other crap like that because bipartisanship is a complete lie.  even if you agree with obama on one major issue there are still hundreds of other things that the man will be able to affect.  he will levy taxes, appoint justices, block spending bills (or worse APPROVE THEM), and a myriad of other things on his liberal agenda.

In matters of style, swim with the current;
In matters of principle, stand like a rock.
                                          Thomas Jefferson

Re: The Presidential Debate II

Justinian isn't really voting for Obama tongue the thought of it is amusing though

Re: The Presidential Debate II

funny how people here (who I guess fall in the category Obama wants to give a tax cut) whine about Obama INCREASING taxes, while McCain is primarily handing out money to the ultra rich.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

> vissertje wrote:

> funny how people here (who I guess fall in the category Obama wants to give a tax cut) whine about Obama INCREASING taxes, while McCain is primarily handing out money to the ultra rich.
__________________________________________

that is ignorant

In matters of style, swim with the current;
In matters of principle, stand like a rock.
                                          Thomas Jefferson

Re: The Presidential Debate II

how is that ignorant? McCain wants to give tax cuts to the rich, Obama to the middle class.

for the wallets of the middle class Obama's better

Re: The Presidential Debate II

McCain wants to give tax cuts to the middle class and to companies which employ the middle class.

Obama wants to tax the companies that employ the middleclass which will result in job cuts. and he wants to give tax cuts to the middle class which historically has used tax cuts almost exclusively to pay off debts, which wont help the economy at all.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

Soth,


Of course that's now how the system is today.  I agree,  the system we have now has many faults.



I was merely stating the system I would want in place, which is very socialistic.    I laid it out to show you that not all socialists want to give "free hand-outs" to lazy idiots.

He who stands atop the highest pyramid of skulls can see the furthest

39 (edited by Justinian I 08-Oct-2008 18:36:01)

Re: The Presidential Debate II

<<@ justinian

dude why are you going to vote for Obama? from what iv read about you through your posts you are mostly conservative. This cant be about "bipartisanship" and other crap like that because bipartisanship is a complete lie.  even if you agree with obama on one major issue there are still hundreds of other things that the man will be able to affect.  he will levy taxes, appoint justices, block spending bills (or worse APPROVE THEM), and a myriad of other things on his liberal agenda.>>

I'm voting for Obama because I just don't care anymore. Because of the economic hit that has devalued my family's assets, my confidence in the Republican party has been extinguished. I am now really tired of their misguided idealism, and this was demonstrated with the debate last night when McCain really only reinforced what he said. I sensed that Obama was more intelligent and had more strategic sensibility. I can't say what he will do exactly, but it's a gamble I'm willing to take knowing that McCain is a faithful member of a method that isn't working and can't even defend his position.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

there has to be a middle class for them to get a break, and it is so much close to the rich Vs. the poor these days.
the middle class would have to make over 100k to be middle class these days and the average income excluding the ultra rich is less than 30k per year.
so a tax break to the middle class would include very few people.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

> BC Cougar wrote:

> there has to be a middle class for them to get a break, and it is so much close to the rich Vs. the poor these days.
the middle class would have to make over 100k to be middle class these days and the average income excluding the ultra rich is less than 30k per year.
so a tax break to the middle class would include very few people.>>

$100,000? That's upper middle class. They are people who generally have professional degrees and work professional jobs, like doctors and lawyers.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

i stoped reading all the other posts after this by justin
"I'm now voting for Obama"

SAYS IT ALL!!

never thought there'd be a turn around from the man who at one point wanted obama dead tongue

good for you justin tongue

Re: The Presidential Debate II

> Gladiator wrote:

> i stoped reading all the other posts after this by justin
"I'm now voting for Obama"

SAYS IT ALL!!

never thought there'd be a turn around from the man who at one point wanted obama dead tongue

good for you justin tongue>>

Don't think I don't hate him or don't want him dead, I just hate the Republicans more atm.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

meh.. either way smile
welcome tongue

obama has this locked, and i'm willing to argue with anyone on how obama with all the factors of the race today can't loose in any situation it's simply impossible unless...-you know what- happens...

and about the tax thing.. yes i'd LOVE to do it the mccain way, but the truth is WE CAN't
WE CAN NOT, we DO NOT have the money, NO WHERE do we have the money
and you know the money we didn't have and still don't have, you can add about a trillion more to that money we don't have
so how in the hell do you keep decreasing taxes, and make even less money, and have even less money, thus add more to the money we don't have .. follow?

and oh yes, maybe we could have a spending freeze on everythin but defence, but defence takes up most our budget
like suze orman tongue says SHOW ME THE MONEY

Re: The Presidential Debate II

"what you just said Inviltrist is not going to happen.  even under todays system people can leach off of the government.  I was working at a sign shop three years ago and the owner was a great man.  There was a man that he had met who was going through hard times with debt and unemployment.  so my boss offered him a job.  The man refused it because if he took the job he would lose his government aid.  to me that is bullshit and to think anyone is going to be successful in changing that loop and ending leaching is wrong."

You just need some rules. In my country if you are with out a job and you are getting government aid you can only refuse a job 3 times. Also when you are getting aid you can be call to do several jobs for free according to your qualifications, if you refuse you will stop getting aid.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

"
I was merely stating the system I would want in place, which is very socialistic.    I laid it out to show you that not all socialists want to give "free hand-outs" to lazy idiots."

if you're going to list a government that doesnt work with today, but only in a fantasy, why would you need any government at all? if all the people are saints, theres no need for government.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

to be middle class you have to be in the middle range of incomes, not just a professional, now days a 4 year degree is no better than a high school diploma used to be, and unless you work for yourself or on commission you will never see 100k a year.
times have truly changed for the worse.

Re: The Presidential Debate II

inflation is too high for 100K to even matter for some tongue

Re: The Presidential Debate II

> avogadro wrote:

> "
I was merely stating the system I would want in place, which is very socialistic.    I laid it out to show you that not all socialists want to give "free hand-outs" to lazy idiots."

if you're going to list a government that doesnt work with today, but only in a fantasy, why would you need any government at all? if all the people are saints, theres no need for government.




There has to be order for progress to take place.   In that ideal world, all of humanity would act as one machine.  Every person a different cog of the machine, all perfectly content performing their given task, with top concern being on the greater good of the machine they all are a part of.

He who stands atop the highest pyramid of skulls can see the furthest

Re: The Presidential Debate II

socialism, HA HA HA, that has proven, many times, to be the fastest gate way to corruption that has ever been.
where it took us 200 years to become corrupt, it would only take 50 years for socialism to do the same.