1092 good job

actually i was doing QUITE well in defending myself (as well as retaking more than most anyone else outside of TYMO) until 61 FINALLY broke threw and killed my pop.... leading to negative income and with lack of aid/activity from the rest of the fam... my fleet disbanded and there ya go

lets put things into prospective.
1. score system if worked on properly will be a good indication of the best fam of the round.
2. size for most of the players including me is the most importent but it matters how you got your planets as well... a fam that got top size thrue farming or nap breaks isnt the best fam in my eyes.
3.this round was a very weak round with most top fams having only 3-4 active players the rest semi or not active at all.

who do i think did the best this round? prubebly 1091 with 1092 coming close second but again it was a very weak round and all you needed to do good was 2 active attackers with 2-4 active bankers/resoursers to soport them and take planets.

congrats to who ever did good this round i do hope next round will show more activity from more players and that we will have someone working on the score system b4 it starts.

if you ask why i think it was a weak round? my family had no active attackers most of the round no proper infra plan and maybe 3 players that where active all round and we finished top 10 in all 3 catagoreis = weak round.

> Zidi wrote:

> keep dreaming tymo!

1st in score means u led for most of the way then lost at the death, that doesnt mean you deserve to win
Like liverpool in the championship, 0 - 3 down, and came away 4 - 3 winners

1st in networth means more goal scored
1st in size means most points

You really just prove my piont, Liverpool won the cup as the last team standing at the end, and then the title. (you can compare the win in that game, with a surprice player jumps, anthat turned the war) Just like NW and Size ranks. That was a tournament who desides whos best at the end, not whos best in the first matches... NW and Size are like that. Then again, Liverpool did NOT win the league, who was the overall title of the entire season, where good matchese even early on, and perhaps a drop in form at the end, made it exiting, but still they won the title, or just lost it at the end to a fam in better form and momentum.... Just like SCORE...

Liverpool was heroes in Champions leage,, and The winner of premier league was heroes in that arena that year.

Man U was even bigger heroes the season they took more than 1 title, so get of it, and see the diffrense here.

No title is better than the other. It al depends on whats most important for you. Do you enjoy Shampions league, premier league, or both? Manny possibilities

Masterfreak u have no clue what ure even talking about when it comes to the Score ranks so give it a rest...everytime i read ure post i get 5% less intelligent. and my career is in intelligence.

Score is awarded on every tick. The formula is:

Score = (your NW / max NW in galaxy + your planet count / max planet count in galaxy) * (10 + turn number / 50).

The "turn" above is the number of ticks since the galaxy started. As you can see, later in the rounds a higher score is awarded.

The score is really awarded to individual players. This means that if a player is lost during the round, the family suffers in score

> thisyearsmostopen wrote:

> this aint a cup knock out system - this is a league !

Its both

Yes Ripper, I got all that, and if you read forums yourself, you would notice that I talk about the posibillities this makes for a broader game in the FUTURE, not the past. All new things have errors, and needs adjustments. But the players need to adjust aswell, if we want this game to evolve. And thats what I talk about

Clearer now?

the Score ranking was a TRIAL run that is found out to have MANY errors in it!!!

name them ?  and where is the proof ?

i expect you lot to say this for one reason - you didnt win on score..... if you did you would be saying what i say

anyway rounds over so just get over it people