You would also have t' take th' size o' th' galaxy an' how many family's into consideration, if ye can explore all rd or if ye cant.

Yes And if they have time to make it, a intergalax rank system calculating these things for us every round.

Remember to copy,post,edit and paste to avoid pirate talk.

Sticks, youre wrong..  doesnt matter how many planets ye have, score is only calculated as a percent o' how many planets th' top fam has

Score systems is an ok ranking system, but it has a few bugs which make it stupid.

Each single player gets score points in a family and basicly keps them till end of round. If that player deletes or gets deleted for whatever reason his score points vanish with him.
This really sucks, since family get punished twice. First they lose a player and then they also lose a lot of ranking.

Also I would like that the difference between start of round and end of round being even bigger then it is now, so a family that has been leading a long time early round could acctually get passed by later.

The same happens with nw and planets so I don't know if score should be any different.

Scoring system was a good idea. I hope they make some adjustments after this round. I also like baha's suggestions. Hes on the mark with it.. Another thing is who cares to compare fams from previous rounds? Does. Anyone know that moolar controled the. Most planets by perecent 3 rounds in the row ever? No those things are forgotten. Lets just worry about 1 winner er round instead of this latest nub crap where 4 fams claim victory

There was a vote a few rounds back. Ayb did not evan make the list and moolar won the vote;) not to mention ayb is 0-4 against us. I think tdc was voted 2d. Lets not forget our last encounter with u guys breaking nap and still losing bad in mw where u went inactive. Good try thpough all we need now is genesis to spit his lies and excuses and were set

[brought from ideas]

There has been many arguing about the latest ranking system for the score thing.
I'm gonna try to explain in my words, hope you understand it cause it is really easy, here we go:

How to do SCORE real and reasonible:

First of ALL, Individual Score:

1. Every tic change, in every gal, some calculation is required (easy for a comp), to get the 'media' of the total nw in the gal. That means sumarize ALL player's nw and divide it by the number of players in the gal. That way you obtain the 'tic media nw'

2. The Individual NW Score is obtained by dividing personal nw by the tic media nw.
As example, if you have 35k nw and tic media nw is at 45'6k nw then it means you are below media and your score will be below 1 point: it is exactly 0'7675. Other nw similar to media will get a score around 1 point, and those whose nw is superior to media will get a score over 1 point.

3. The Family Tic NW Score is calculated by sumarizing ALL the individual nw scores of the fam. That means a fam with 12 ppol and 12 points at the end of tic is a 'media' fam cause every player has got a score equal to media. It will be a midtable ranked fam.

This was for nw smile

NOW FOR SIZE, easy as hell:

4. For size we do exactly the same as for nw, we get the 'tic media size' by sumarizing ALL the owned planets and dividing it by the number of players in the gal. Then we obtain the Individual Size Score by dividing individual size by media size.
Now the Family Tic Size Score is obtained by sumarizing ALL the individual size scores in the fam. The so called 'media fam' with 12 ppol will get also 12 points.

5. The INDIVIDUAL TIC SCORE is the Individual NW Score plus the Individual Size Score at the end of tic.

6. The FAMILY TIC SCORE is the Family Tic NW Score plus the Family Tic Size Score.

This way our 'media fam' of 12 ppol is getting a total of 24 points at the end of tic and will be ranked at midtable. Fams over 24 points a tic are doing ok and fams below 24 points a tic are doing bad.

Also, I thought about Inactives, no problem, with this method Inactives can be counted since it is based on 'media', only thing is with many Inactives decreasing the media, the big players will get more points in comparison to others, but well activity has to be awarded in some way.
In case this can be a problem solution is easy, just don't count players marked as 'Inactive' when doing all the calculations smile

I HOPE FOR GOD SHAKE YOU UNDERSTANT IT wink

Lol PP_ i remember MW and tri when i had a fam, not even with genesis and them.. I kicked your ass in explophase, you wanted to nap me but i wouldnt let you back in my sector... and kept your spread at a minimum all round. My fam finished #1 in size and your was down to 4th or so.. Guess its just the rounds you wont talk about

PP_ see there you are claiming you played 4 rounds, like i said you would... . well ill leave your trolling be, cause i dont want this thread to be ruined

off topic? perhaps...