201 (edited by Gwynedd 29-Sep-2008 21:26:57)

Re: 91+70 vs 63

[]

Re: 91+70 vs 63

"[Jarik, this is a warning. Be careful with your posts, banned language is banned for a reason.]"

Apologies.

To be honest, I didn't even realize. People seem to get away with almost anything in flamewars that in my opinion, is even more offensive, I didn't realize swearing was banned. o.O

Anyways, I'll stop saying it then. =P


"Jarik is nubje tongue i told him to clear 1 portal and he didn't show tongue"

I told you night, my interents went down. sad


~Jarik

Re: 91+70 vs 63

doesn't matter

excuses !

bring me to 666 planets biatch !

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Start sending fleets to hover over me then nub. Wozz is stealing all your planets. =P

205 (edited by Gwynedd 29-Sep-2008 21:27:18)

Re: 91+70 vs 63

[]

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

206 (edited by Gwynedd 29-Sep-2008 21:27:35)

Re: 91+70 vs 63

[]

207

Re: 91+70 vs 63

yeah im Hydrop....my road in this game has been an on and off one. tbh im sure i played with Genesis once before and your right i wasnt main attacker cause it was my first round back after like a 1.5 yr break and then they went and pulled some lame dishonorable shit that i wouldnt be a part of.

i havent had as many wins as you have nor do i claim to be as good as you. i just do what i do best and it gets me places. ive won the round probably 3-4x in totality since i started playing (major gals like andro,mw) but ive also finished top 5 the majority ive played.

and just to give u a lil bit of history on this fam there PP. we started at 33rd place due to not having randoms. i picked up drafts that i hadnt played with a whole bunch before as well. the idea was just to have a good easy round because once we started we didnt think we were gonna make it to win the round. figured eventually some other fam would eat us alive with their huge infra. but we decided in that first week we would use a particular strat. we would sacrifice the huge infra and growing and in return have a constant supply of building fleet and warring. we would hit the fams we might think would hit us before they did.....thus giving us the advantage of suprise at best.

so far through solid planning and great gameplay and teamwork we managed to get ourselves where we are now. we could have sat back and grown infra but we dont see the need for it due to the fact we are where we are.

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Blah blah, lotsa empty words here...

Maybe my comments won

Re: 91+70 vs 63

You're wrong WS. =/

"I couldn't care less" insinuates there's *nothing* out there that you'd care less about. Hence, even if you wanted to, you couldn't care any less than you currently do because currently, you don't care at all.

"I could care less" is the opposite. It insinuates "Yes, I *could* care less than I currently do", which implies that there's more things you care less about.

210

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Zanharim look at 70's starting pcount and then where they are now....you will see what 91's attackers helped do. my family just recently started taking planets heavy from your fam.

so poor fighting?? i think not...im the one who ran the majority of the fleets in your fam so that 70 could come in and run rampant and then later on leo did as well.

and all this talk about score blah blah blah....its largely in favor of infrawhoring families. ill say it until the end...this game is a warfighting game and those who actually fight wars should be rewarded. score doesnt help to reward people who fight as much as my fam does because we wont have the high infra or nw that everyone else sits around at.

the purpose of a banker is to boost an attacker and pay his upkeep. the purpose of infra is for wars. the attacker is the centralized point in this game. without him your family is nothing. bankers and resourcers are a dime a dozen....great attackers are few and far between. thats what the "score" system should reflect

Re: 91+70 vs 63

"the purpose of a banker is to boost an attacker and pay his upkeep. the purpose of infra is for wars. the attacker is the centralized point in this game. without him your family is nothing. bankers and resourcers are a dime a dozen....great attackers are few and far between. thats what the "score" system should reflect"

I agree, though I'm sure bankers will disagree. To them, attackers are around just to give them planets. XD


Anyways Zanharim, I certainly do respect the fight your fam has put up. What I find really, really surprising is that you've done the opposite of what most fams do. Most will start retaking heaps, then give up. You, no offense intended, really sucked during the first year of war. You barely fought back. Then you got your act together, and you're holding your own well.

Oh, and gimme back my morale. You keep jumping fleet every time I resend. sad

~Jarik

212 (edited by Gwynedd 29-Sep-2008 21:28:25)

Re: 91+70 vs 63

[]

" i am the bringer of death.. destroyer of worlds"

Re: 91+70 vs 63

we are playing in the size win strat;)  it has always been like this and will always be

" i am the bringer of death.. destroyer of worlds"

Re: 91+70 vs 63

well jarik we will have to disagree on the care less thingy cause after all i could care less u know smile

and i know i shudnt say this but  just cant help myself and that attitude stems from the whole i could care less attitude lmao smile

but as arch rightfully said americans say i could care less and since we dictate things in the world hehe its our way smile

and side note to 63

i want to say thanks for the most fun time in my icc playing time ever.

all of u have made this war fun and and exciting instead of giving up. thanks to u all 4 da fun.

u all played well and i will vote for many of u in the awards time. u seem to be a great bunch of guys.

and i truly could care less if anyone doesnt agree with me on fam 63 smile

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

215 (edited by Gwynedd 29-Sep-2008 21:29:05)

Re: 91+70 vs 63

[]

" i am the bringer of death.. destroyer of worlds"

Re: 91+70 vs 63

It's a shame 63 rejected that NAP.

I know you don't like the fact that Aries attacked you first and then offered NAP, but really, as he's said before - he has a size goal and he's only gonna NAP when he hits that.

I'm feeling kinda bad for 63 - I really feel we should have stopped a while ago and given them some mercy. But I'm gonna stick by our allies until they hit their size goal. But if 63 aren't gonna accept the NAP, I'll continue fighting too.

That being said, I can understand *why* 63 have refused the NAP. And I can really respect their persistence. Still. =P

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Jarik

um, 1091 has said they wont nap.....you sure they actually offered one besides the one saying "give us 500 planets"? tongue

218 (edited by Gwynedd 29-Sep-2008 09:02:10)

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Right, I've read a few things (not everything) and I seriously find it all highly amusing.

All of you should [w00f!] lighten up.

This IS a game, and tbh it's all fun, regardless of whether you're winning or losing...I'm enjoying retaking and pissing off "The Horde" <-LOL from reaching their size in rank.

But in all honesty now, take your head from out of your arse: people like [w00f!] and EVEN people in my fam! (I shan't name names cos I'm not gna get into an argument with people I'm "working" with). The point is, you're all trying to prove your worth and how long you can stay online for and how much of a bastard you are and practically some of you sound like if you could sleep with yourself you would.

THAT is pathetic.

It is a game, enjoy it, attack, retake, op, debate WHAT-EVER you like. But for gods sake don't start wanking over your awesomeness when you've just raided and got 100 planets from one banker who was offline - because I'm here to tell you, it is not awesome, it is quite sad that you have to announce it to the IC community to make yourself feel secure in your skin. Try saying it to work colleagues and you'll get cock-slapped you fools!

I feel for you who bring in your "reputations" and talk yourself up as though you're practically the creator of everything wholesome.

You need to get out more and tone your whole commitment to the game down, because when people start getting abusive and vengeful to the point of if you were within stabbing distance you'd pull out a machete...it get's quite scary tbh.

I've been playing for 6 years on and off, and yea sure, I get revenge, sure I've been annoyed but I've NEVER moaned and moaned and moaned and moaned when things don't happen the way I want...NOR do I put myself on a [w00f!] pedestal and basically ask people to worship me when I do pull off a strat (LMAO [w00f!]!).

So please, argue what you want but take what I said into consideration.
2 things in particular really.

1. It's a game, it means nothing to *real* people.
2. Don't try and [w00f!] yourself because you have more figs than me.


I still respect your opinions and points if they have reason, and I DO expect a lot of abuse from what I just said, but please remember you don't all half make me laugh and what-ever you do say which isn't *constructive* will fall on deaf ears as I have stuff to do.

-=Haste=-

Just call me George.
Actually don't, my name's Alex.

Ignore this signature.

219

Re: 91+70 vs 63

umm, i offered a nap...sent it to 3 of 63's players. so far its been declined and we have had a multitude of retakes.

thats like the 4th offer turned down....not offering again

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Don't feel bad for us we dont feel bad for ourselves you win some you lose some, theres only one winner of the round in the end and i dont think it will be any of us smile

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Can someone please stop tne NAP takl eweryone BUT us are bringing up? Thats whats phatetic. I understand the dissapointment 91/70 might have, since we dont want a nap... but seriously, stop the naging,

waste, the legacy of mankind.

222

Re: 91+70 vs 63

tne takl eweryone


???

Re: 91+70 vs 63

TMK

Week 30, 21
An official offer of PNAP from fam #1091 to fam #1063 is being offered as of right now.

Terms are:

1. PNAP
2. Normal compensation rules apply

This message has been sent to the leader of both fams and 2 vl's.

~Fleet Admiral
The Horde


Signed, Ripper of Aries (1091)

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

224

Re: 91+70 vs 63

It's kinda gay that 2 fams need to bang 1 family. I live for 63 atm. We've got the same problem, it's 61/83/86 vs us.

Re: 91+70 vs 63

they have rejected nap and instead started  blowing planets so people can say wat they want as i could care less and less we have decided they want us to farm them so we dont want to be rude and not comply so farm it is hell that just means easier to get 1st in size smile

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.