176 Reply by WS IC Legend (edited by WhiteShadow 28-Sep-2008 01:31:36)

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 91+70 vs 63

masterfreak if we wanted simply to try and win by score which would be borring as hell just like trying to win in NW is boring as hell, we have dominated sec 1 all round and could have simply sit there and kept everyone out and done nothing but infra whore and we would have been much higher in score but we dont want to play that strat ok, is that ok to play the game likke we want to from the start???

of course then little size pp wud be in here telling us like he already has all the other top 10 fams how sorry they were for doing that.

so u have little pp condemning the other top 10 for how they played and now u have little pp condemnig us for playing the total oppsite, and lol little pp hasnt condemned his own fam for the way they played in fact he kept BRAGGING how a 23rd fam was taking on 1st fam so it sounds like unless ur in a little pp sized fam u aint shit

but like i always will love to say now for a while "we in america could care less" what little pp thinks or anyone for that matter.

and little pp by all means leave america so u will not have to be ashamed, would improve our country im sure.

and bring it on next round so i can school u on how to play the game little pp like I did the very 1st round I played against you and now im much better than i was then smile

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

177 Reply by PP_ (edited by PP_ 28-Sep-2008 01:42:40)

  • PP_
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 694
  • Tag points: 124

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Whiteshadow I have no doubt your an insure old man thats drunk half the time and cursing at the US government because u got no job.
Not 1 top 10 fam has impressed anyone this round or maybe u havent been reading what people have been saying?

On 1 hand we had fams like 55/86 that were controlling the infra part of it ( though still it was sad) while just doing enough attacking wise to stay ahead. Then the other side we had fams like yours who took 7-10 days to save for 1 war then we had the not so privalage of reading your bragging thread of how u planed,saved,executed and finished off this or that fam.

U know the gal is weak when anyone controls an entire sector, has total crap infra and sits here bragging about it.

  ROFL whiteshadow u couldnt school my little boy on anything let alone this game which im your master in. Your a pathetic n00b hands down.

U beat me eh? just like all the other 2 dozen wanna be braggers who try to say that. Oh wait I know the round I joined Sd with 2 other people and I was blocked the 1st 5 days of the round came out lost my planets as a banker to your 3 man fam. Must of been hard to take planets from someone 1/3rd your size who had 1 inactive banker, 1 inactive pax and 1 inactive attacker.

Its reasons like that that when vet players want a break from competetion, but still want to hang out that they go undercover and just log on once a day to relax. Otheriwse total losers who play 24/7 and cant win like u sit there and brag about anything they can to pound their chest.

I dont have to worry about your shit fam, u guys will be half our nw after 10 days and left in the dust nub

smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 712
  • Tag points: 522

Re: 91+70 vs 63

its whiteshadow rather than whitesands... two different beings tongue

Whea!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

179 Reply by Hyd

  • Hyd
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: 91+70 vs 63

PP lay off...its annoying watching you going around throwing your opinion into stuff that you dont actually know the facts about. I think your a good player and I dont dislike you like most people do. However, lets get something straight we havent raped them for 1k planets...rofl they barely had 2500 when it started and my fam had slightly over 2300. Please dont accuse my family of wanting to net myself 300 planets out of the war as being a bad thing.

91 did not just contend for size rank in the last couple days of this round. we have contended for it now over half the round. and we started at 33rd rank!!!! We have worked hard to get ourselves to the top of the pile and while you may hit on us because our infra isnt as good as a couple others fams i promise u it isnt as bad as you think it is first off and i dont care that it isnt as good as 55,83,84,63 etc... because we could have beaten any one of them and have proved it to 83 and 63.

Oh, for the record...you can play a bad round against me PP and no insult meant here, but you wouldnt win. not by a long shot. you would have to have a great round to beat me and my fam just because i know what im capable of and my family does what its supposed to in order to win what we deem important. size rankings..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

180 Reply by PP_

  • PP_
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 694
  • Tag points: 124

Re: 91+70 vs 63

smile hydro Ive seen 1 really good round from u out of 7 yrs. Last time i was allied to your fam I had to tell u what to do with attacking when I was a banker. U were always the follower.

And no offense taken, have a nice round. u guys had fun and thats the most important thing:)  Like i said, a bad round by me will still beat the fam your in atm any round hands down. besides I cant have any good rounds anymore, U try to do it with my limited time:).

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

181 Reply by Hyd

  • Hyd
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 0

Re: 91+70 vs 63

you havent seen any of my rounds...and as far as i can remember ive never played with or against you ever PP except in SD. where you got destroyed by my fam (granted you were inactive so i dont credit that to myself)

and there have been much more than 1 round that ive had that are really good...and the last time i was the "follower" as you put it i was 17 years old. im 23 now. long time since then. ive run the military functions in every fam ive been in since and my fam has always contended for the win and always been a top 10 mostly top 5 fam.

ure bad round = me blowing you out of the water....dont make ureself out to be god cause ure not.

also, my limited time is probably just as much as yours. lets see....

1. US Marine (9hrs day)
2. PT Workout (1hr day)
3. College (1-2 hrs a day)
4. MMA Training (2hrs a day)
5. Fun for myself (when i find time)

i do keep a busy schedule...and when i get shipped off to Iraq in a couple months thats when everyone has their chance to be on top agian...til then imma try to make it hard for all of you

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,085
  • Tag points: 62

Re: 91+70 vs 63

well do to all the shit talk in forums .. i will not nap 63 ... i gave them chances and they are taking up my time...plus last round if i remember the farmed nolio's fam 2 vs 1 down to nothing..forum talk is cheap nothing more.. just words no actions..its so funny to see how losing fams act...btw due to ur trash talk give me enough reason to carry on.. plus knowone has messaged me besides the leader one time long ago .. i replyed wand still havnt got a answer... its 63 fault...its the same story over and over when a fam gets owned.. they reach anywhere they can...its a game people.. u win some u lose some.. move on..

" i am the bringer of death.. destroyer of worlds"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

183 Reply by Rin

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: 91+70 vs 63

wow 63 is down 1k planets, thats enough man :<

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

184 Reply by Jarik (edited by Gwynedd 28-Sep-2008 09:40:22)

  • Posts: 423

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Holy shit! God, I go inactive for 2 days because my internet kept going down and I had a lot of stuff I had to go to and this war thread turns from a friendly discussion to a [w00f!] flamewar! [w00f!] guys CALM THE [w00f!] DOWN!

Seriously.




Ripper, you've made it obvious you're not very good at diplomacy. You're an excellent war planner, and a great attacker, but right now you're not making any friends! Was it not you who said after the 83 war "Guys, don't boast in the forums - let other people acknowledge us instead"!?

I understand 91's goal. They set a goal for 300 planets (which isn't a lot for a fam with 2600 planets), however 63 have been stuck in ping pong and have blown a hellova lot of planets. From 91's point of view, you can't blame them for dragging this out until they hit our goal.

70 isn't gonna pull out until 91 pulls out. So we're gonna have to wait for 91 to finish before we'll finish up.

PP, I disagree when you say score should decide winner. To me, size is and always will be the determining factor for the winning fam. Because IC is ultimately about attacking. Bankers are there just to support attackers. Infra is there to support attackers. And size is always the hardest thing to achieve (apart from farming). Score just says that a fam has been consistently good all round. THat being said I'm an attacker...and have a very attacking-biased viewpoint. =P

I dunno what racist shit has been going on between Scorp and Pitbull, but c'mon guys...racism is pretty crap - especially on IC. IC is multicultural - we've got people here from all over the world. I understand that some of you may say things that you don't think is offensive - but other people might take it really personally. Like, in my group of friends, we're all pretty unracist....but the things we say are so bloody racist it could make a Ku Klux Klan member offended. But that's because we all know we're joking. But you gotta be careful, because other people might not understand.


Now I must give kudos to 62/63. They've really managed to get their act together and start heavy retakes and give us a hellova lot of trouble. In fact, over the last 3 days, we have taken over 250 planets - however they've retaken so much, that we've only actually gained like, 50 or so.



Also on a sidenote...this year and last:
98 planet(s) captured by Kamil (62 %) (68 retakes).

He's been our top attacker. And it's his first round!  =O

~Jarik

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 800
  • Tag points: 29

Re: 91+70 vs 63

lol


"last round they farmed some fam" --- um, I do believe there was a shuffle. How is this the same family? They have all of 2-3 players from last round and that makes the family?



From the scoring....looks like 63 still is ahead wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

186 Reply by Rin

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: 91+70 vs 63

i must agree that 91/70 have been the best fams/alliance this round. they are the only fams that had big wars (who cares they saved and warred thats what u are meant to do anyway) 55 did nothing but build infra and clean cores which any fam thats active can do. 63 didnt pay attention and 91 took advantage of that, lets not even mention 62 their activity is laughable.

70/91 i think you guys have done enough to 63 and for the spirit of this game its time to stop.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 423

Re: 91+70 vs 63

"wow 63 is down 1k planets, thats enough man :<"


Yeah, the problem is 62 has retaken a lot, and 63 has blown a lot.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 800
  • Tag points: 29

Re: 91+70 vs 63

lol...

62 has retaken a lot? WHEN did they all of a sudden start helping?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

189 Reply by Rin

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: 91+70 vs 63

> Themiddlekingdom (TMK) wrote:

> lol...

>62 has retaken a lot? WHEN did they all of a sudden start helping?

Gen have been helping the whole time with a -30% attack bonus

Nolio's icc finished and asked for a fleet jump, and didnt do a lot and gen abused him a little so he did some retakes. I did some retakes and hit an attacker portal twice.

thats about summed it up.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

190 Reply by Jarik (edited by Jarik 28-Sep-2008 03:43:31)

  • Posts: 423

Re: 91+70 vs 63

"62 has retaken a lot? WHEN did they all of a sudden start helping?"

Mate I did mention a couple of pages back that 62 had joined in the fight....

THis year and last year for 70. Dunno how badly they're fighting 91.
197 to #1063
120 to #1062

120 planets is nothing to shy from. Plus, in addition to that, 62 have been blowing our portals too.

Mainly Raging Bull. Good work to him.

`Jarik

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

191 Reply by Rin

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: 91+70 vs 63

lol ragingbull > all 62 attackers

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

192 Reply by Sticks (edited by Sticks 28-Sep-2008 06:33:28)

  • Posts: 1,034
  • Tag points: 1

Re: 91+70 vs 63

The last 21 hours,  gotta say its been busy, that's an average of almost 40 successful  attacks per tic between the family's

-------------------
535 from #1063
-------------------
-------------------
298 to #1063
-------------------

✞✝✞ Șώεετ ɖરεᎯɱȘ ✞✝✞

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

193 Reply by Masterfreak (edited by Masterfreak 28-Sep-2008 07:02:09)

  • Posts: 1,742
  • Tag points: 18

Re: 91+70 vs 63

> [Pw9] Lyvidian wrote:

> i must agree that 91/70 have been the best fams/alliance this round. they are the only fams that had big wars (who cares they saved and warred thats what u are meant to do anyway) 55 did nothing but build infra and clean cores which any fam thats active can do. 63 didnt pay attention and 91 took advantage of that, lets not even mention 62 their activity is laughable.

70/91 i think you guys have done enough to 63 and for the spirit of this game its time to stop.


Erm... even with our inactive allies 62 in this war, as alliance, put 62 and 63 together, and count scores. Whos the best alliance between 91/70 and 62/63??? lol.

waste, the legacy of mankind.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,446
  • Tag points: 70

Re: 91+70 vs 63

whiteshadow, the 'could care less' and 'couldn't care less' issue isnt an american vs european thing, becos i know ppl like smartz who think its ridiculous that all you yanks say 'could care less'.

just think about it for a minute. what are you actually trying to say. you're trying to show that you dont care what the person is talking about, that its not important to you. saying 'i could care less about it' actually means that u do care about it a little. saying 'i couldn't care less' means that there is no way you could care less, which is actually what you want to say. i dont know how it got twisted like that.

I was using a metaphor that means God is watching us. You've heard this, there's a toilet on the roof.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,083
  • Tag points: 378

Re: 91+70 vs 63

[Jarik, this is a warning. Be careful with your posts, banned language is banned for a reason.]

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,202

Re: 91+70 vs 63

we did pay attention lyv, we knew 1 tick after their post whos up ther was gonna be a raid/war comming.
however, how we handeled it is where we sucked tongue

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,143
  • Tag points: 18

Re: 91+70 vs 63

ouch jarik, would be a shame if u would get blocked:P

watch ur lil mouth big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,436
  • Tag points: 23

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Jarik is nubje tongue i told him to clear 1 portal and he didn't show tongue

Jarik you are the man !!! <3

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

199 Reply by

  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 999

Re: 91+70 vs 63

63 has enough morale they are attacking us as well tongue

------------------>I'm Portgas D Ace!!!<-------------------
Keep Your Friends Close But You're Enemy Even Closer!!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 804

Re: 91+70 vs 63

srry my bad, to drunk still big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points