Re: 91+70 vs 63

84 are war blockers thats all Xd!

102

Re: 91+70 vs 63

lol:) 84's biggest attacker is 1.4m nw, count the infra he has and I doubt there doing much

103

Re: 91+70 vs 63

> Pitbull wrote:

> > Jarik wrote:

> I'd like to say 62 have ot a hellova lot of shares with the systems we took off 63. If they hit back now, they could take probably 100 planets instants, and the rest as tickers...

People keep saying it's a 2v1 due to us. No, it's not. It's a 2v1 because 62 haven't helped 63 and made it a 2v2.

`Jarik

jarik is correct it should have been a 2 vs 2 but our weak ass allies punk out on us,all they kept saying is that our attackers are inactive, any fool with a trannie and a 2 soldiers can attack,
ive retook so many planets just by send 1 and 2's. I say drop them and take their planets for compensation for not helping us for the second time this round even after we bailed them out from 84 beating them down, lets face it they wont attack back so free planets for us.

------------------------------
funny thing is u are pretty much correct. cant speak for my fam but i personally wouldnt care if i got attacked by u guys.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 91+70 vs 63

actually 63 had a little over 2550 planets when the war started cause 55 had less than 2600 and was still 1st place.

63 is now down to little over 2k so we have taken bout 500 planets.

now I offered 63 leader a pnap BEFORE war started for 500 planets which wud have saved his fam all the losses in nuked, kill iron, kill gc, and so on as well as not having to build fleet that was just killed again anyway, plus all the loss of infra and on and on different kind of losses.

It was refused so now there must be MUCH MORE than 500 planets lost to be considered worth our effort imo anyway.

and yep 62 shud have helped and if i were 63 i wud demand 62 pay their comp for an end to the war.

or even more fun wud be if 62 would join so we can beat them too smile

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: 91+70 vs 63

> WhiteShadow wrote:

> actually 63 had a little over 2550 planets when the war started cause 55 had less than 2600 and was still 1st place.

63 is now down to little over 2k so we have taken bout 500 planets.

now I offered 63 leader a pnap BEFORE war started for 500 planets which wud have saved his fam all the losses in nuked, kill iron, kill gc, and so on as well as not having to build fleet that was just killed again anyway, plus all the loss of infra and on and on different kind of losses.

It was refused so now there must be MUCH MORE than 500 planets lost to be considered worth our effort imo anyway.

and yep 62 shud have helped and if i were 63 i wud demand 62 pay their comp for an end to the war.

or even more fun wud be if 62 would join so we can beat them too smile


White shadow the fun in the game is warring why would we give you 500 planets for us not to war i'd rather fight than just give away planets or why play at all.
We lost fair and square and we can except that , now its time to deal with no good allies before the round is over.

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

Re: 91+70 vs 63

I agree with Pitbull.

IMO NAPs involving planets only should be if those planets are in ping pong. =/

Otherwise, war. =P

~Jarik

107

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Should always be aware of who u ally and what their intentions for the round are before you maken an alliance. This is why alot of alliances are swapped non stop throughout the round as well as ending up with an ally doing nothing.

I remember being allied to darrks fam 1 round called futurama. These suckers got killed early on falling to 25th, we saved them then covered their ass for 3/4's of the rest of the round, so while they boomed we fought our enemies and their enemies only tohave them talk shit towards eor and actually have the nerve to try and say there gonna win the round and they were better then us:) I still believe darrk was the one that got the pax to jump 9m wizzards and opp me in our tri war. We still finished 1st in nw and size, but not from any help from that pathetic group of players

Re: 91+70 vs 63

I'm very impressed with 1063. All of them seem to have carried themselves with dignity and honour so far.

While I may not place them as the best fam of the round, as they could have beaten us with more teamwork and early clearing, none of them have been bitching at us, none of them have spammed the forums and none of them have done anything that a hellova lot of people seem to be doing this round. *cough* Joor *cough*.

I had planned to war them to end of round. But the way they've reacted politically and on the forums has been good and we might stop earlier.

~Jarik

Re: 91+70 vs 63

sorry ws but thats bullshit, thats a redicuouls choise handover 500 or lose more in a war, things is if ur a decent fam you war a fam and dont make rediculous proposals, you take an amount of planets (can be a lot when the fam u war is annoying you or whatever) but you let them live.

You can chose to keep attacking us untill we have nothing, but then we can keep annoying you by just jumping agents and wizzies and opping you...

Re: 91+70 vs 63

lol pitbull i sent that msg as a joke anyway but the point is since we did war we shud get morwe than 500  p's, we got 300 from 83 after 3 ticks war and they had less planets at that time.

but i will say its been a fun war and ur fam did very very well in a war that was lost b4 it started simply because of our position and savings, BUT i love how ur fam hasnt given up and kept doing retakes

and i really lmao when i had lot of fleet out and u took 3 of my portals in ur core same tick even tho I still had almost 200k droids at home. Damn u must have had a load of freaking droids, too bad my 500k figs were all out at that time smile

anyway im all for ending whenever our fam and allies want to and i say we move on to 62 smile

and as Jarik said 63 is honorable fam no whining done and looks like they had fun also in defeat smile

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: 91+70 vs 63

dont count to much on the fun part:P

112 (edited by Pitbull 25-Sep-2008 17:59:06)

Re: 91+70 vs 63

> WhiteShadow wrote:

> lol pitbull i sent that msg as a joke anyway but the point is since we did war we shud get morwe than 500  p's, we got 300 from 83 after 3 ticks war and they had less planets at that time.

but i will say its been a fun war and ur fam did very very well in a war that was lost b4 it started simply because of our position and savings, BUT i love how ur fam hasnt given up and kept doing retakes

and i really lmao when i had lot of fleet out and u took 3 of my portals in ur core same tick even tho I still had almost 200k droids at home. Damn u must have had a load of freaking droids, too bad my 500k figs were all out at that time smile

anyway im all for ending whenever our fam and allies want to and i say we move on to 62 smile

and as Jarik said 63 is honorable fam no whining done and looks like they had fun also in defeat smile


Yeah i guess i got lucky with those attacks smile Anyways we would appreciate a ending to the war and its been fun even tho we were on the losing end, and yes i have a shit load of droids.

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Week 19, 20
Week 5, 20
btw keep blowing ur planets lol ur helping us smile

Signed, SCORPY of SCORPIO (1091

Yea like i'm going to not blow them and let you keep them lol.
Stupidness runs a long way.You Dumb F'n Redneck B! smile

Signed, The original of CUT Pitbull (1063)



umm this is not proper i must report it

" i am the bringer of death.. destroyer of worlds"

Re: 91+70 vs 63

lol, hypocrite

115 (edited by Jarik 26-Sep-2008 01:34:10)

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Oh shush Scorp. =P

Pitbull was obviously joking. =P



Anyways, I'm interested in NAPing 63. For a sum of the planets in ping pong...I think our allies feel similarly.

~Jarik

Re: 91+70 vs 63

DeAtH RiDeR
Solar Warrior Re: 91+70 vs 63lol, hypocrite

Offline



please show me were

" i am the bringer of death.. destroyer of worlds"

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Hmm, actually forget what I said.

It's getting interesting now.

62 have joined the fight. It's become a 2v2. 63 have managed to take 100 planets off us in retakes. Good work!

~Jarik

Re: 91+70 vs 63

ahhhh the plot thickens smile

119 (edited by Masterfreak 26-Sep-2008 21:31:53)

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Ofcause for the record only, 70 and 91 jumped us while we had war, and so on, but ok smile For 2 fams who was planning for taking 55, I think we do a good fight without allies, and unprepared as we were in war. A fresh start might have ended diffrent :-) We never know thoug...

waste, the legacy of mankind.

120

Re: 91+70 vs 63

all in all 70 and 91 had to recall about 600 fleets or more from 55 and resend them in a matter of 48 hrs to come after ure fam...it was a complete change of plans and it happened in 48hrs without either fam really being at full scale readiness to take on 63. yes it could have gone differently but i like a challenge so i went ahead and rushed it against 63 a bit against many fam and ally members wants...it still worked out in our favor so i win that battle against them rofl

Re: 91+70 vs 63

no there was no war at all I did some research and you were farming a lower ranked fam thats all. They even offered to undeclare war if it would help us so sush on the war shit. If you called that a war then whats happening to you now, WO3 totl chaos and mahem smile

~Rebirth~

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Well, all in all, I hear mostly big talks about 91 and 70s greatness, so I guess the winners has been calld before its ovet then :-) Fun game anyway, and thats what it is :-)

waste, the legacy of mankind.

Re: 91+70 vs 63

... and yes, we had peace talks, and was to offer a NAp the day 91/70 attacked :-) But still, a conflic not yet resolved, but close to. Newertheless, on our part, a surprice attack while we was in another conflict that was scaling down as most conflicts before there is peace, was done.

waste, the legacy of mankind.

124

Re: 91+70 vs 63

umm last time i checked u got a 24hr notice that we were gonna fight you rofl....thats plenty of time to take care of peace talks with a fam

Re: 91+70 vs 63

pffft we will see

~Rebirth~