Re: 91+70 vs 63

62 is pretty terribad i must agree with TMK on that.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 91+70 vs 63

PP and everyone else needs to stop posting about something they know nothing of except when they read in the forums.....

1091 has had AMPLE opportunities to win size if we wanted to by farming the tiny fams in our sector or having raped 83 for 800 planets when we had t he chance. instead we leave the little fams alone and we let 83 off the hook for 300 planets cause we respected them and wanted to give them a chance to finish this round in the top 5.

we wanted 1055 not cause we wanted an easy win in size...but because we wanted to take down the #1 ranked fam. to set ourselves apart as a family. they got jumped on by 86 and then the rollback completely ruined any shot we had at fighting them. so we picked the #2 fam in size.....1063 and decided to go after them. So what if its a 2v1? they got an ally and we never said their ally couldnt join! if 62 wants to join in we welcome the fight and look forward to more competition.

i applaud 62 for having fought so hard right now....they dont really stand a large chance at winning but they can definitely make it tough to just rape them....

so pls...all of you who like to come in here and post things about which you do not know...do us and all of IC a favor and blow me ok? cause thats about all your mouths are good for.

Re: 91+70 vs 63

i am sure u meant u applaud 63

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 91+70 vs 63

I can't believe this.

TMK, what the hell are we meant to do?

If we war a small fam, we're farming, if we war a fam 8-9 NW ranks ahead of us, we're trying too hard and dishonourable for double teaming a fam that isn't trying....how the hell do you win this game!?

As Ripper said, we chose 55 adn 63 as targets not cause they were fat, but because we wanted to be bold - make a name for ourselves as the fam who would fight even the top rank fam and win. I hardly think choosing 55 and then switching to 63 had anything to do with us wanting to take on an 'easy' fam.

Oh, and for your info? I have zero morale problems. Even though I'm on 100 planets that people still haven't taken off me, haven't declared war and only have 8 morale planets I can fight 62 too.

So instead of calling us dishonourable for a 2v1, how about 62 get involved and help their allies? I mean, it's not like 62 are far away - 62 are scattered all over 63's cars! I have tickers with all of them!

~Jarik

Re: 91+70 vs 63

lol only war this round tmk, you should pay more attention, if I would bet I would say someone in 55 is the hacker, cause they got pretty lucky we didn't strike them. The plan was there we just moved a sector smile

~Rebirth~

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Last year:


----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
217 planet(s) captured by Youkai (95 %) (54 retakes).
43 planet(s) captured by LOL (70 %).
25 planet(s) captured by Kamil (54 %) (8 retakes).
13 planet(s) captured by Prozac de Capri (87 %) (13 retakes).
12 planet(s) captured by Titan de Capri (50 %) (1 retakes).
7 planet(s) captured by Wozz de Capri (64 %) (1 retakes).
4 planet(s) captured by Shadows (13 %).
1 planet(s) captured by CanadianTire (100 %).
-------------------
306 from #1063

We overwhelmed the enemy 322 times. 4 families and 249 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 220 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 29.



---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
55 planet(s) lost by Youkai
19 planet(s) lost by Kamil
19 planet(s) lost by Titan de Capri
16 planet(s) lost by Wozz de Capri
10 planet(s) lost by CanadianTire
4 planet(s) lost by Shadows
2 planet(s) lost by Sheepeh de Capri
2 planet(s) lost by LOL
1 planet(s) lost by Prozac de Capri
-------------------
107 to #1063

Re: 91+70 vs 63

I'd also like to note that up until now, the only one fightign this war from my fam was *me*. Me vs 63.

The rest of our attackers had a *minimum* of 30 ticks to 63's systems. I relied on a couple of BR fleets they had hovering, and all the fleets they sent to hover over *my* planets.

63 got close to clearing me - they CPFFed all my planest like 3-4 times each. But no attacker really actually cleared them. If they did, we'd have lost.

Now it's too late. All of our fam is portalled across their cores....

~Jarik

Re: 91+70 vs 63

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
195 planet(s) captured by Aries (77 %) (32 retakes).
167 planet(s) captured by Capricorn (87 %) (137 retakes).
32 planet(s) captured by Virgo (97 %).
29 planet(s) captured by Sagittariuss (43 %) (4 retakes).
3 planet(s) captured by SCORPIO (100 %) (3 retakes).
2 planet(s) captured by Libra (33 %) (1 retakes).
-------------------
395 from #1063
32 from #1083
1 from #1062

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
39 planet(s) captured by Aries (53 %) (3 retakes).
6 planet(s) captured by Sagittariuss (60 %) (2 retakes).
6 planet(s) captured by SCORPIO (100 %) (2 retakes).
1 planet(s) captured by Capricorn (50 %) (1 retakes).
-------------------
52 from #1063

Re: 91+70 vs 63

jarik nd ropper,


you fail to realize my main point.....grow a pair of balls and fight 1 on 1.

Re: 91+70 vs 63

There is a reason there are allies in this game TMK tongue

We ride together...We die together...

Re: 91+70 vs 63

im glad to hear the hacker is in our fam, Sir Prozac...

because if theyre as active at coding/hacking as they are at IC in general.... oh wait, never mind.....

Re: 91+70 vs 63

TMK u of all people i got balls...more balls than you i daresay.

and sorry for the nick Ripper im more commonly known as HydroP

now that i got my balls out showing em to ya...lick on em a while

Re: 91+70 vs 63

are you gonna sell him your pubes for $20?

Re: 91+70 vs 63

it was a joke awexome, just to point out how lucky you guys were.

And TMK if you grow a set of brains you would realize every family in top has an ally, they can all use them. Problem however everybody is too conserned about their own ranks. It took us 3 allies this round to find 91. It was an ally we could work with, and do decent warfare.
Infra whise we suck, but you don't need to be good in infra to play capri, its a new gameplay. It is not us you need to be teaching a lesson in honour, its 62 that only just now started to aid their allies after they lost ~350 pl.

Whats the honour in leaving your allies to die???

~Rebirth~

Re: 91+70 vs 63

I'd like to say 62 have ot a hellova lot of shares with the systems we took off 63. If they hit back now, they could take probably 100 planets instants, and the rest as tickers...

People keep saying it's a 2v1 due to us. No, it's not. It's a 2v1 because 62 haven't helped 63 and made it a 2v2.

`Jarik

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Well 62 is helping now big_smile

Well I am not really "helping" them. Just passing the time =p

63 can still die for all I care

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: 91+70 vs 63

I know Prozac, hence the subsequent jab at my own fam's lack of activity......

LOOK! What is that thing? It looks like half man half bear half pig.... NO NO NO its half pig half man half bear....

Re: 91+70 vs 63

nolio is bad.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 91+70 vs 63

and half spider X(

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: 91+70 vs 63

maybe i decide to start attacking 62:p

but seriously, i dont think anyone in 63 really blames you guys for anything... All i would like to ask now is be decent, take ur 15% of planets and end it smile We already lost around 600 planets i think, which is a big win for a war, e decent and let us live, we have fought a clean war where we were outmatched (more active, more recourses, more planning, more tactics more families:P) Congrats on 91 and 70 for planning this war and winning:)

too bad my family wasnt active enough to spot hydro faster to clear him, and we arent active enough to put up a good fight...

Re: 91+70 vs 63

agree with dutcher tongue already said 62 deserves to be hit too !

Re: 91+70 vs 63

Dutcher,

havent you lost 25% ?

before the war you were just under 2700 planets (by like 8).... now you have just over 2k.

Re: 91+70 vs 63

like i said, we lost a lot, and i think its about time to end this...

99 (edited by Pitbull 25-Sep-2008 16:20:23)

Re: 91+70 vs 63

> Jarik wrote:

> I'd like to say 62 have ot a hellova lot of shares with the systems we took off 63. If they hit back now, they could take probably 100 planets instants, and the rest as tickers...

People keep saying it's a 2v1 due to us. No, it's not. It's a 2v1 because 62 haven't helped 63 and made it a 2v2.

`Jarik

jarik is correct it should have been a 2 vs 2 but our weak ass allies punk out on us,all they kept saying is that our attackers are inactive, any fool with a trannie and a 2 soldiers can attack,
ive retook so many planets just by send 1 and 2's. I say drop them and take their planets for compensation for not helping us for the second time this round even after we bailed them out from 84 beating them down, lets face it they wont attack back so free planets for us.

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

Re: 91+70 vs 63

We have DECLARED WAR on family The Capricorns (1084). The Capricorns (1084) has DECLARED WAR on us.
The Horde (1091) has DECLARED WAR on us.

And we are still at war with 84.

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war