Re: American politics paradox
lol, no, I am not serious. It was more of a symbolic use, like a methaphor.
You can't just use "Let's refinance" idea that simply. More importantly, it might imply that it works in 99% of the time. Not 100%. The remaining 1% is for the plan B - that is what you resort to when the "house for sale" does not go away (or a big foreign debt* -> or something that you'd just don't expect to be necessery) would not be possible to be refinanced.
Let's make a distinction here - that of plan B - and notice the *beyond reasonable expectations* thing going on. It is beyond reasonable expectations that something will be completely out of the ordinary, within give or take 5-10 years. Thus, getting debt sounds like a good idea to increase the growth. But this expectation is just an expectation - the assumptions might not turn out to be that great - so there emerges the need for 'plan B.'
Thus, I am not saying with my metaphor that the two are the same. But I refer to the business practice of having two different plans - one if the bussiness goes smoothly and one if it does not. Because in is easy to get far when nothing stops you, but if there is a mountain on the way, only the skilled climbers will go over (or some tunnel-blasting machine?)
I am scratching my fingers to give another example - something I have frequently done wrong in my personal life. Depending on e-mail. I'll send something to my own e-mail to save it. But if the e-mail gets deleted, internet is not working, I can't access what I saved! Thus, I would became dependant on my expactation that I can get to my e-mail - which works 99% of the time. And for the remaining 1% - huh, I am no rocket scientist, there is not that much that depends on me
but using assumptions that everything will work fine allow for the 'what-if' scenarios to emerge.