No, he wasn't calling for a 100 year war but he was saying he wouldn't mind one. American presence isn't wanted in the middle east. If McCain is going by his standards of war then yes, there would be war throughout his entire term of presidency. Terrorists are forming BECAUSE of Americans in the Middle East. As long as it is shown that he is for and not against stopping the war =p
"And I borrowed my way through school and had a part-time job, and so can you."
That's not exactly true. The same principles don't apply to everyone. Education costs are rising, jobs are declining and on top of that, depending on your course of study, responsibilities at home, etc. it may not even be possible to work a part time job through school. Interest rates on loans are also increasing so it's also very difficult to pay those back when you don't have the time to meet school requirements and work a part time job.
If school fees were affordable and the job market was open then yes, the war could be supported by the state budgets. But it's not. Basically you take the main thing draining our economy and supplement it by taking away from the things that are working to build it up.
More war, less jobs, less educated individuals, more crime = positive or negative? Depends on your outlook. It's just not smart to continue fighting a war that can't be won. But that all depends on what your objectives on the war are. You can't end terrorism in the middle east as long as one single American is in the middle east.
You can't find osama bin laden because he's either A. Dead, B. Working with Bush on some major conpsiracy, C. Protected by Iran, D. Sitting on mars drinking a pina colada.
You can't form a democracy in the middle east because this is not how those people operate and it will only lose power after some time.
You can't end the war in Iran unless the Iranians somehow change personalities altogether.
Sex without the e is still SX!