Re: If the Obama/Biden Democrat party is ANYTHING like Obamarama Gladiator
yes, i said it's everywhere...did i not?
but i don't misuse it in your threads newb ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Politics → If the Obama/Biden Democrat party is ANYTHING like Obamarama Gladiator
yes, i said it's everywhere...did i not?
but i don't misuse it in your threads newb ![]()
Just other threads? ![]()
Thank you for being so considerate in not spamming my threads but only other ones. ![]()
By the way, you're welcome in my making you more famous than you already were. ![]()
Come to your senses and VOTE Palin/McCain...Positive CHANGE that's believable!!! ![]()
gladiator .... spamming....
NOOOoooooooooo
I have no complaints of the mods, with a small exception in WFS. I resent when he occasionally moves my threads to another forum where nobody is going to read it, and he's the only one who does. However, I have no hard feelings on WFS, he's still cool in my book. He's just sometimes a little irritating.
My views are mostly conservative and at times considered extreme, and really the liberal mods don't bother me.
BW/Einstein,
I have noticed that you two escalate a flame war a lot.
Newb,
Your previous threads in question were spam, and I would have done far worse if I was a mod.
For some reason, I have a feeling Justinian's method of moderating would include mass identity thefts... ![]()
> Zarf BeebleBrix wrote:
> For some reason, I have a feeling Justinian's method of moderating would include mass identity thefts...
>
rofl.
I consider Justinian to be mostly liberal, not much conservative. ![]()
Oh, and based on my copying and pasting (on page 1, I think the 2nd post) what this forum considers spamming (I edited nothing), I did not spam at least 40% of the time when creating new threads. ![]()
...and I have no problem when threads are moved to the proper forums.
> Newb wrote:
> I consider Justinian to be mostly liberal, not much conservative. ![]()
Oh, and based on my copying and pasting (on page 1, I think the 2nd post) what this forum considers spamming (I edited nothing), I did not spam at least 40% of the time when creating new threads.
>
I'm liberal? WTF?
I'm not a hippy shouting human rights and equality!
Yeah but you spammed 60% of the time, and that creates a domino effect.
Notice that I did not say EXTREME liberal/left-wing...heh.
But if any mod is being objective (including when i used to be one and it's not fun when you have a bunch of true spammers), they would punish the "criminal" threads AND ignore the non-"criminal" threads despite the amount of "criminal" ones by the same user.
No, I am NOT offering myself up to be a mod.
I'd love the job but ONLY if I had the proper time to do a proper job of it on a consistent basis.
I've just started university (though I'm a lot older than you think...heh) so I now have no such time available.
"But if any mod is being objective (including when i used to be one and it's not fun when you have a bunch of true spammers), they would punish the "criminal" threads AND ignore the non-"criminal" threads despite the amount of "criminal" ones by the same user."
That's not how it works. Mods aren't your personal editor. If you spew [nonsense] time and time again, they're not going to dig around in it looking for a grain of wisdom. They're going to save themselves some time, remove/close it all and get on with their lives. And that's how it should be.
> Black_Wing wrote:
> gladiator .... spamming....
NOOOoooooooooo
----
alright, if you say so BW
@Justinian.
Fuel the flaming ?? Me ??
NOOOooooooo ![]()
I just inject my perfectly sound, unabashed, spot on views of things.
![]()
hehe, the mods are incorrigible, but they are lovely to the point where I could never hurt them
no, the mods are people, and people are entitled to their own beliefs and can formulate their own ideas on their own, whether or not someone influences them.
plus! plus, the fact that 99.2% of the current mods have been playing IC for a long time and have either been mods that long or know the rules well enough to enforce them without prejudice.
Of course, this is based on what I have seen, which has been a whole [truck] load of [dogpuke] in this forum, but I very rarely post in politics unless I feel like it, let alone the general forums.
Besides, why are we questioning the integrity of our mods when, as I said, 99.2% of them have been playing a very long time and are much loved by our delightful IC community of nuts, queers (no offense), nubs, kids, pedophiles (for certain people we like to make fun of
) and cat lovers (just for you KT).
"the fact that 99.2% of the current mods"
I don't think that percentage is possible.
> Theodora wrote:
> "But if any mod is being objective (including when i used to be one and it's not fun when you have a bunch of true spammers), they would punish the "criminal" threads AND ignore the non-"criminal" threads despite the amount of "criminal" ones by the same user."
That's not how it works. Mods aren't your personal editor. If you spew [nonsense] time and time again, they're not going to dig around in it looking for a grain of wisdom. They're going to save themselves some time, remove/close it all and get on with their lives. And that's how it should be.
_______________________________
Agreed.
Mind you, this hasn't applied to me.
Though you would disagree.
And I would then say it applies to you instead.
I was mostly not referring to the content or the message but rather the method.
But you might need my glasses to see that.
> Listos wrote:
> Besides, why are we questioning the integrity of our mods when, as I said, 99.2% of them have been playing a very long time and are much loved by our delightful IC community of nuts, queers (no offense), nubs, kids, pedophiles (for certain people we like to make fun of
) and cat lovers (just for you KT).
_____________________________
I wasn't questioning the integrity of the mods, mostly.
But rather a mod.
Then the leader of that mod, to save time and headache, going with what that mod wanted.
By the way, I absolutely love cats!!!
> Simon wrote:
> "the fact that 99.2% of the current mods"
I don't think that percentage is possible.
__________________________________________
Let's not nit-pik. ![]()
I got the concept.
I know this is politics part of forum, but actually being a mod has nothing to do with politics. Even more so: F-mods have same power/authority over the forums as mods.. so "full mods" etc.. is in this case a useless term ![]()
you are looking way more into things then there is...
lololol @ The Yell
You edited that comment into my quotation of someone else.
You need to be more discreet
And my English is not that awkward. X( I take offense to that terrible phrasing.
hmmm
I really pity flint more than any other human being
> Simon wrote:
> "the fact that 99.2% of the current mods"
I don't think that percentage is possible.
oh but it is o.O
with split personalities it is
roflrama
cute
Imperial Forum → Politics → If the Obama/Biden Democrat party is ANYTHING like Obamarama Gladiator
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.