Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

lol you take measures to get me banned you get warred, dont act stupid

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

Not sure who Hornblower is but 84 started this, not 62 tongue

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

Issome peepol gonna die?

Praise Kek

4 (edited by R2D2 08-Sep-2008 23:52:40)

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

I was not going to say anything but definitely since you want to bring it up, I will reply.

1084 in NO WAY started this way.
This war all started with Ze Moose (1062) getting into core systems of 63, stationing huge fleets so that the planet could not be retaken, getting portalled and then RAIDING 84'S BANKERS PLANETS!

Of course, the only retaliation for 84 was to outjump it's attackers' fleets ahead of Ze Moose and take back those planets and break Moose's portals. In doing so, Moose of course lost a bit of his fleet, which he was not too happy with.. SO FAR, Moose started this, Moose lost fleet, Moose gets angry....

With Moose clear, 84 decided to essentially do what 62 did by raiding 2 systems of 62. And here comes the war.

For all you people out there .... here's 62 position: We do whatever we want .... and there should be no consequences ... no matter how wrong we are!

Furthermore, 84 has tried several times to make peace, only to be snubbed. But yep, in a war game, honor is rare and hence, the smaller and weaker don't stand a chance.

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

Right, so, Ze Moose was portalling in his allies systems and you cleared him. You then raid 62s bankers and blame 1062 for all of this? lol you do make me laugh tongue

6 (edited by R2D2 08-Sep-2008 23:53:46)

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

Methinks..you skipped a key step .... and no....2 ticks from home system is not ally's core ...

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

Were you actually in that system?

Praise Kek

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

emi i want u to have my children

Break it Down!

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

lol lexuzis isnt even in that fam?

but i do believe it was emi who started it, or nolio, or one of the other loose attackers in 62

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

It looks to me like 84 started it, then provoked one of the attackers, then tried to cry and say 62 started it. You sound rather butt hurt.

Praise Kek

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

go 1084!

12 (edited by twistedpuppet 09-Sep-2008 00:41:29)

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

first attack i see is by 84 and it was in week 6 of year 12
that means 3 days ago
84 made the first attack on emi
and he proceeded to retaliate
horny mom began trying to clear one guy off a  couple of planets on week 7
on week 9 is when emi finally begain taking taking crap tons of planets he took 10 in the course of an hour, basically, clearing a system
on week 20 they begin attacking people who were not in the original fight by taking Rhino's planets
after that they began trying to farm by taking planets that were newly explored in systems that were not originally contested


This was not a simple, "he attacked and we retook". Your actions were that of what amounts to an unofficial war declaration LONG before Emi started running his mouth. He was raping your top attackers, so you decided to provoke him. Good for you. You know how to push buttons. You guys are now the official button pushing muppets of Capricorn.

Praise Kek

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

lies!

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

Prove it.

Praise Kek

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

84 started this.

i said it therefore it's the truth.

prove me wrong

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

16 (edited by [Pw9]~KT~ 09-Sep-2008 15:02:16)

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

eyhm what about this for a change in dialogue, WE DO NOT CARE WHO THE [] STARTED IT!!

JUST KILL EACHOTHER OFF!!

~Rebirth~

17 (edited by [Pw9]~KT~ 09-Sep-2008 15:02:34)

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

> Sir Prozac wrote:

> eyhm what about this for a change in dialogue, WE DO NOT CARE WHO THE [] STARTED IT!!

>JUST KILL EACHOTHER OFF!!

NO U

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

i pwn 84 started it!

21:19] <&James|sunstorm> any body name james is punishble by raid or nuke
[21:19] * UnDeath is now known as James
[21:19] * James ([email protected]) Quit ( NickServ (GHOST command used by James|sunstorm) )

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

> twistedpuppet wrote:

> first attack i see is by 84 and it was in week 6 of year 12
that means 3 days ago
84 made the first attack on emi
and he proceeded to retaliate
horny mom began trying to clear one guy off a  couple of planets on week 7
on week 9 is when emi finally begain taking taking crap tons of planets he took 10 in the course of an hour, basically, clearing a system
on week 20 they begin attacking people who were not in the original fight by taking Rhino's planets
after that they began trying to farm by taking planets that were newly explored in systems that were not originally contested

you think year 12 was the beginning? lol

THE FAMILY NEWS FOR YEAR 11
----------------------------
---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
16 planet(s) lost by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
3 planet(s) lost by tosh2
1 planet(s) lost by Kristin Kreuk
1 planet(s) lost by CoCo lee
1 planet(s) lost by Julia Louis Dreyfus
-------------------
18 to #1062
3 to #xxxx
1 to #xxxx
-------------------
We have been beaten 22 times. 3 families and 22 planets involved.
We actually lost 5 planet(s) in total. At least we were able to retake 17.

that alone proves you wrong
I hate politics so I'm not going to bother with this thread.... lets enjoy the war

I'm Fankay, who the hell are you?

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

hes posting info on the bored CLOSE! EDIT! MOD! big_smile

21:19] <&James|sunstorm> any body name james is punishble by raid or nuke
[21:19] * UnDeath is now known as James
[21:19] * James ([email protected]) Quit ( NickServ (GHOST command used by James|sunstorm) )

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

Bawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

lol 62 lose bad nolio

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

hmm 62 seems to have come out on top, and his analysis proves nothing because he can't even provide actual dates. But more than likely that was them encroaching into systems already inhabited by 62. You tried to farm. Got your asses pwned, provoked an attacker with a known loud mouth, then bawwwwwed to mods about said loud mouth because he was kicking your asses ALL BY HIMSELF.  Besides, by the time you even read the forum Coco, talks had been in progress for an hour and your leader was supposed to have messaged everyone to stop attacks until given further word. Shows how much you even read before clicking something, button pusher.

Praise Kek

Re: 1062 vs 1084. LOL

your all missing the point that 1084 got me banned and then raided my bankers

they are bums =p

DON'T GIMMIE THAT MELLOCHIA!

2003-10-30      Activated my account
2003-10-30     Registered!