Topic: Does the Zodiac play a role in politics? If so, how?
Wow,
I just listend (and watched) my first ever USA national party convention!
Mind you, I basically only listened (and observed) to Sarah Palin.
I analyzed her to death.
Hey, did you know that she's about a 65% Aquarius (with about a 35% Pisces in her)?
The Water Carrier
January 21 to February 19
Traditional
Aquarian Traits
Friendly and humanitarian
Honest and loyal
Original and inventive
Independent and intellectual
On the dark side....
Intractable and contrary
Perverse and unpredictable
Unemotional and detached
...her "dark" side doesn't seem so bad in comparison to all the other signs' weaknesses.
(especially in comparison to mine and wig's, though there are worse ones than ours...though all of them obviously have strengths)
On the other hand, that last major weakness listed in the "Pisces" negative traits I've noticed in her in how she relates to the military (i'm not against the military, just the abuse of it):
The Fishes
Febuary 20 to March 20
Traditional
Traits
Imaginative and sensitive
Compassionate and kind
Selfless and unworldly
Intuitive and sympathetic
On the dark side....
Escapist and idealistic
Secretive and vague
Weak-willed and easily led
AFTER I POSTED THE ABOVE ON A DIFFERENT SITE, I RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING RESPONSE:
'looking up her sign was your version of "analyzing her to death"?'
MY ANSWER TO THAT RESPONSE WAS:
'no, i looked up her sign info after i analyzed her
...the sign info only confirmed what i had already found and noticed'
I've been accused of doing the Zodiac sign thing (and falsely been accused of doing the horroscope bit).
"I am a flexible centrist: not stuck on right-wing, not stuck on left-wing, and not stuck on centre...and I don't flip-flop either" <<< me
Fighting for peace is like stopping the raping of a virgin.
