Re: Harmful pranks could get you killed!
They need to be invaded and civilized Agh ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Politics → Harmful pranks could get you killed!
They need to be invaded and civilized Agh ![]()
> The Dragon Agh wrote:
> Um are every american in here complete lunetics?
Someone throws an egg on a car ffs!
It's not even a crime!
But then you go "egg-thrower was wrong" wtf?
The guy that shot him should go to prison for at least 20 years (concidering the usualy prison time in your crazy country).
Else he'll probably do it again the next time... when someone kicks a football in his general direction or whatever.
Soth is clearly insane with his comment.
vissertje as well.
TheYell ... very much so.
And Flint was always insane.
Ffs people, don't you have enough crimes in your screwed up country to shot the head of a kid who throws an egg and support this?
______________________________________________
Vandalism isnt wrong to you???? what backwards country are you come from?
One which doens't consider vandalism worthy of the death penalty
Sorry if that's backwards
always knew that genesis was backwards.. ![]()
I'm Canadian.
The egg itself isn't the biggest issue, the ego-busting of the original victim (the one being egged) isn't the issue, what is the issue is:
1) the life-threatening aspect of an egg thrown at a fast moving vehicle (or fast enough to not see what's around the driver's vehicle)
2) the lack of respect of the egg(s)-thrower(s)
Newb. There is no life threathening aspect in throwing an egg on a car, and I assume it was a car driving in a city which means it wouldn't move very fast.
And it certainly isn't worth getting shot over which you idiots seem to think.
And lack of respect makes you ok to get shot in the head? Geez.
You really need to grow up.
Dragon,
You can't be an idiot for having a different view on morality. It's something that can't be tested by our intellectual faculties, and neither can "grown up" be in the context you gave it.
For example, I think it's just fine that Henry Kissinger was a ruthless prick. I'm a goal-orientated person. However, most people would find his actions morally objectionable, despite Kissinger's exceptional intellect.
> Genesis wrote:
> One which doens't consider vandalism worthy of the death penalty
Sorry if that's backwards
______________________
no one said vandalism is worthy of death. but it is still wrong therefore it cannot be justified
lol Dragon Agh... and all those other retards who take the comments so seriously... grow some brains! of-friggin-course we're not seriously saying that kid deserved to die (well maybe Flint, don't know about him
)
Good god u people are stupid.
It's just morbid jokes revolving around the sanctity of your car and how lame and cowardly it is to mess with one.
PS Golk made the egg joke, not Soth... and it was funny so u guys can stick it with all the overbearing [blabla]
/flame mode
And I know blabla you shouldnt joke about stuff like this, but sometimes it just feels better than being outraged and/or feel sad whenever another poor schmuck gets killed. To quite a little something written in the top left of the screen: >> Imperial Forum "Why so serious?" <<
Sorry if anyone was like personally offended because a similar thing happened to someone they knew or whatever. I really do hope they catch the guy that did this and put him away forever.. or give him the death sentence, whichever is the maximum punishment out there.
The man who shot will serve prisontime or possible death penalty if they manae to track him down.
This is nothing else than a murder, so dont treat it as.
Sure the murderer was provoked, but none the less he shot to kill and shall/will be punished thereafter
> The Dragon Agh wrote:
> Newb. There is no life threathening aspect in throwing an egg on a car, and I assume it was a car driving in a city which means it wouldn't move very fast.
And it certainly isn't worth getting shot over which you idiots seem to think.
And lack of respect makes you ok to get shot in the head? Geez.
You really need to grow up.
____________________________
I already stated that I was against the dude being shot in the head.
Please read my whole post.
It wasn't a long one.
If something quickly covers your view while driving, and something you didn't see (or now can't see) is in the way for you to drive safely, then the speed at which you drive is irrelevant, except that the faster you drive the more devastating the impact.
So to talk about messing with a car... whats the punishment on that? I mean it's obviously more than vandalism. OK egging isnt that bad, but lets say someone.. writes on it first, then u find scratches, more scratches later, then a dent, then a smashed window (= what happened to my car)
or they spraypaint a big star of David on it like happened to my brother's car (ps no i dont live in a shitty neighbourhood
)
What's the punishment on that? You know what? it doesn't even matter! because those cowards won't be caught anyways. I bet it would be some community service here anyways.
I propose that messing with someone's car, because of the lack of respect as newb points out, should be punishable by 10,000 euros on top of the damages.
The moral of the story is even criminals do not like being criminalized.
Crime is crime regardless if it is supposed to be a prank, or if it is supposed to hurt someone.
Eggs can damage the paint if the person is on their day off. It is not just 'that easy to fix'.
I shall surely smite with great wrath and furrrious anger all those who egg my brother!
And you will know I am the Lord, when I LAY MY VENGEANCE UPON THEE
/empties clip
"Vandalism isnt wrong to you???? what backwards country are you come from?"
It isn't vandalism, as nothing was broken
I agree Agh there.
We all do similar things when we're in our puberty..... I know I'd have been shot at least 20 times if that's justified..
"It isn't vandalism, as nothing was broken smile I agree Agh there."
If I shot you in the head and somehow your head didn't flower (hypothetically. play along), is it not figgin' attempted murder?
While I agree shooting the kid is wrong, but defending the kid is equally wrong.
In addition:
"Police said 16-year-old Garrett Burton was ... in the backyard of a home when someone shot him in the head just before 3 a.m."
I thought it's not against the law to shoot intruders of your property.
Simon - how can it be "equally wrong" if you compare throwing an egg and shoting someone in the head?
> The Dragon Agh wrote:
> Simon - how can it be "equally wrong" if you compare throwing an egg and shoting someone in the head?
____________________________________________________
DEFENDING someone who shot someone in the head is equally as wrong as DEFENDING someone who vandalizes private property.
Some people can't read everything. ![]()
Soth. That is one of the most stupid things I've ever heard.
People with superiority complexes can't wrap their heads around that Soth.
The other people who can't/won't, I don't know why.
Soth, sorry but that's a silly statement....
lol ye scallywags, avast. do ye not understan' what im sayin'? when somethin' is wrong it is WRONG not matter what level o' harm it did its still WRONG. so defendin' th' actions o' a person in fault in a small case is just as wrong as defendin' th' actions o' someone in a big case.
an' im not talkin' about what defense attorneys do. that is completely different. Defense attorneys be tryin' t' prove innocence in th' sense that they didnt do what is accused o' them whereas im talkin' about someone who is actually condonin' a wrongful action.
With that line o' thinkin', mass-murderers an' rapists deserve th' same sentence as a small time burglar..
And hurrah, we're back in the 18th cetury where people were imprisoned for years (sometimes) for stealing a bread..
Imperial Forum → Politics → Harmful pranks could get you killed!
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.