"Simulate" being the crux of the matter...

Simulate includes the math portions. A step by step break down. Go away fool, your just making noise.

i'll believe this when i see it work. Atm I believe spook3's proof more than your theories, at least i understood that proof

> Einstein wrote:
> Simulate includes the math portions. A step by step break down. Go away fool, your just making noise.<

  A simulation is not proof of concept.
  Mathematical theory is not proof of concept.
  No proof of concept = no backing.

  Learn to program, create your program, and when you have proof that your concept works you will have more backing than you will ever need. Until you do this no one will ever take you, or your theory, seriously.

Once again, in plain English?

yeah the child Fokker cannot understand it is as simple as compressing

Result A leads to Result B

Result B leads to Result A

Decompressing can often be far more complicated than compressing. It is far more difficult to walk backwards than you think. Try doing it without looking behind you. That's right, while facing forward the whole time. Not only do you walk backwards, but you have to stay in a particular formation as well. The only way to see is to use your peripheral vision. At this point, walking backwards becomes far more difficult than if you did the same formation walking forward. It's the concept of opposites. Remember that old saying that it takes more muscles to frown than it does to smile? It's the same here. It will take far more steps to decompress than it did to compress and therein lies the problem with your hypothesis.

Twisted Puppet

Here is a quick sample code:

1011011010101011

Compressing (without command section, this is to small a file to actually compress)

1    1    0
1    1    1
1    0   
1    1    1
1    0
1    0   
1    0
1    1    1

After huffman
111110010000010011

Step to undo is simple

Reverse Huffman (well known, proven in so many different forums, papers, etc)

Then Start counting in file #1, if bit is 1, then next bit is located in file 2. If thats a 1 then next bit is in file #3. Next bit is located in file 1 then regardless. If you find a 0 the next bit is located in file #1. Always take the left most bit.

It has no complexity, involves no time increase that I can detect. In fact due to the fact it does not need to do various count features the compression stage requires, it can go ahead and just decompress... so much faster than the compression stage.

Doomer no one has stepped up yet in full, but a couple are trying... plus the two people I am emailing who feel like the anti-global warming scientists with me in this tidal wave, and a few others.

And still no one wishes to try the challenge?

Flint, you don't seem to see the little details. I still don't think this is going to work in reality. You've been at this for nigh on 5 years.  Pix or it didn't happen.

Oh no - looks like someone has gone one better with a magic compression algorithm

"I now know how to compress any file to 50 bytes.
The file can be of any length, and random data
compress well.

Step 1 - take your binary file, and invert every "1" bit.
Make an note in the command section to encode
the position of the original "1" bits. It is well known that
command sections never exceed about 50 bytes.

Step 2 - compress the remaining data. This is particularly
easy as it is all "0". You could just note the length.

Step 3 (optional) - if the length would take more than
about 50 bytes to represent, we can effectively compress
that too. Thus any file can be reduced to about 100 bytes.
Conceptually, we could do a third stage, but that would
only be needed if the file size was bigger than the product
of the age of the universe, and the number of known fish. "

Beat that

nothing on the evil tyranny of the modship impringing on my freedoms?

people as Nolio said before... Why are you bashing Flint... do you care so much for him you don't want him to waste his time or are you just seeking excuses to make fun of him..

My math knowledge is not sufficient enough to start in on this, so I will let out what I think.. but come on.. no invention or idea (especially in mathematics) is done right away.. maybe flint will work something out of this work who knows.. maybe he is wasting his time...

so just ask yourself why are you posting here