Topic: How Safe are your Buses?
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/07/31/greyhound-transcanada.html
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Politics → How Safe are your Buses?
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/07/31/greyhound-transcanada.html
Safer than that at least!
Yikes!
See, if everybody on the bus had a gun, well ok he'd have shot between 6 and 19 people ok so if everybody else had a gun, then it woulda been swell!
if the driver had a gun, the victum's life could of been saved; how many more lives must be lost to knife violence before you learn from your ways?
"If everyone had a gun, then a gunfight would have happened and alot more people would have gotten hurt both by the attacker and via cross-fire."
yknow everybody in America who wants private gun ownership also wants people to know how to use their guns
"if the driver had a gun, the victum's life could of been saved;"
Well that depends on if the initial stabbing was fatal. The guy was stabbed and, according to witnesses, decapitated. Now if the first stab was to say the heart there's not a whole lot of good the bus driver having a gun would have done.
>>Caton said he heard a "blood-curdling scream" and turned around to see the attacker holding a large "Rambo" hunting knife above the victim, "continually stabbing him in the chest area."<<
Chances are good by the time the bus driver drew a gun, aimed, and got a shot off; keep in mind people were panicking at this point shown by:
>>"It looked kind of like a scuffle or an argument, you know, and then somebody's, like, 'Knife! Knife! Run!' so I was running up the alleyway, slapping people telling them to get going, move, get off the bus. I got pushed over, some lady got pushed over, I was just making sure everybody was OK, and we all got off the bus," said Olmstead<<
So by the time the bus driver would have been able to shoot the guy the victim would most likely have been dead already.
Sometimes guns can help a situation, this was not one of those times. The only thing that would have changed is that we'd have 2 dead bodies instead of one dead body and a criminal. Lateral move in my opinion. Now had the guy who first seen the dude getting stabbed had a gun, maybe that would have made a difference, but not the driver.
Yeah I forget the name of the gas but the Army uses it to put out fires, it reacts with the oxygen in the air and precipitates it so the fire goes out. If the driver had that kind of gas, he could have killed the guy from outside the bus once they locked him in.
DPS, thats complete bullshit reasoning. you're coming to a conclusion because thats the conclusion that you want to reach and not what the information suggests.
"DPS, thats complete bullshit reasoning."
Why? What's your theory?
then there was "it looked like a scuffle", so the victim was struggling with the assailant, giving the driver precious time to draw his weapon. and it shows that the victum most likely wasnty mortally wounded.
everyone would not need to exit for the gun to be effective without endangering other people's lives. if the driver pulled out a gun and pointed it at the attacker, the path from the driver to the attacker would of cleared immediatly, no one wants to sit infront of the barrel of a gun. and buses are small and have emergency exits for extremely quick exits, it would not take long at all for the buss to be emptied; and the account makes it sound like it didnt.
several people were going to head back into the bus to save the victim, indicating they saw a big enough chance that the victim was alive to risk confronting an armed man.
so its extremely likely that a gun could of saved him.
"Well that depends on if the initial stabbing was fatal. The guy was stabbed and, according to witnesses, decapitated. Now if the first stab was to say the heart there's not a whole lot of good the bus driver having a gun would have done."
The first stabs were in the neck.
The real issue isn't about wether guns would have changed anything. I don't think it would have. The lad might not have been decapitated, but he would have died anyway. I think the real issue is how such a Michael Myers-ish person got that idea in his head and how come no one ever really thought there was something odd about his mind ![]()
"then there was "it looked like a scuffle", so the victim was struggling with the assailant, giving the driver precious time to draw his weapon."
True, but I don't think to people arguing is reasonable cause for most people to draw a fire arm. Until someone yelled "Knife!" the bus driver probably thought it was just people fighting and probably yelled at them to stop.
"everyone would not need to exit for the gun to be effective without endangering other people's lives. if the driver pulled out a gun and pointed it at the attacker, the path from the driver to the attacker would of cleared immediatly, no one wants to sit infront of the barrel of a gun. and buses are small and have emergency exits for extremely quick exits, it would not take long at all for the buss to be emptied; and the account makes it sound like it didnt."
People were panicking, they were running towards an exit and some were even knocked to the ground. You think people are going to react rationally when they've got a psycho with a knife behind them and potentially another one in front with a gun? You really give people WAY too much credit. Regardless lets say it took the bus driver 2 - 3 seconds to get out of his seat, draw a fire arm, and shoot and lets say you're right and everyone got out of his way almost immediately. In that time you can get a fair number of stabs in and considering the guy was most likely intent on killing the chances that the victim would have survived are still fairly small.
"several people were going to head back into the bus to save the victim, indicating they saw a big enough chance that the victim was alive to risk confronting an armed man."
Or it was a knee jerk reaction to try. You need to remember the mental state these people were in; they were not acting methodically, they were not calmly assessing the situation and weighing the risks they were in a life and death situation and most likely running on sheer impulse. In the case of the three who went back for the guy it could have been they saw a chance for survival, unlikely as from the article it seems the man was positioned essentially over the victim obscuring the view, or they just reacted on an impulse to try and save him.
Omg these gun mongers are really annoying.
Everytime theres a knife murder they scream "give everyone guns"
Everytime theres a gun maniac running amok in a school they yell " we need more guns"
FFS if you carry a gun you deserve to be shot X(
I wouldn't go as far to say that. I do agree there are some scenarios where someone having a gun can stop people from harming others. However as I said this was not one of those times.
"In that time you can get a fair number of stabs in and considering the guy was most likely intent on killing the chances that the victim would have survived are still fairly small."
you do realize that people survive stabbings all of the time after the attacker has left them for dead? to assume that in less then 30 secs of stabbing with the victum being a healthy young adult male in his early 20's thats struggling against the attacks, that he has practically no chance of surviving the assault if the attacker is killed or stopped is pretty ridiculous.
"
The real issue isn't about wether guns would have changed anything. I don't think it would have."
ofcoarse you dont think so, you're against the use of guns
If the murderer had had a gun he could have killed several people instead of just one.
"If the murderer had had a gun he could have killed several people instead of just one."
the murderer could of killed several people with the knife... it wasnt his intention though, so even if he had a gun, he would of most likely only killed 1 person.
"you do realize that people survive stabbings all of the time after the attacker has left them for dead?"
You do realize that people bleed to death from stab wounds waiting for an ambulance/on the way to the emergency room.
"to assume that in less then 30 secs of stabbing with the victum being a healthy young adult male in his early 20's thats struggling against the attacks, that he has practically no chance of surviving the assault if the attacker is killed or stopped is pretty ridiculous."
Considering he was repeatedly stabbing the guy in the chest before the guy who yelled "Knife!" noticed and the large quantity of vital organs in the torso I don't think it's ridiculous at all. If he managed to hit him in the heart or sever an artery he'd bleed out pretty quick. If Alan was correct and he got a stab into the neck there's not a lot of room to miss the jugular or windpipe in which case he drowns in his own blood. Yes people survive stabbings after being left for dead, yes it's possible he could have survived, but the odds are not in his favour.
What i dont get is that obviously this guys got some sort of mental health problem how come it wasnt discovered.... It amazes me that he didnt have proffesinal care he was obviously deranged enough to knife some guy to death.... Also another thing if some of the passengers had fought they would have won if one man has a knfe and is jumped by about 4-5 men hes gonna have little time to use it.. I think most ppl were concerened about their own safety
Guess you never been aboard a Greyhound Landcruiser Frenzy, only 1 guy can fit in the aisle at a time and no room to climb over the seats to get at him. Rushing him might work if his arms got tired of stabbing, which I guess they wouldn't if he stabbed the guy a hundred times.
Saw this on the news when I was having my breakfast, pretty brutal. It's almost as bad as the guy who killed his mother, cut of her face and whilst wearing her face tried to direct traffic.
And the kid was still asleep, I can't even imagine how it must have been to wake up to that, poor bastard!
"The real issue isn't about wether guns would have changed anything. I don't think it would have."
"ofcoarse you dont think so, you're against the use of guns"
The man stabbed the lad several times, without any reason; so no one saw it coming. The lad would have died anyway, he was have been injured too badly to survive before anyone realised what was going on. In the best case, some cold blooded person shoots the murderer, but you still end up with the same loss of life as now. Thus: having gun carrying people on the bus wouldn't have made zero difference.
"The man stabbed the lad several times, without any reason; so no one saw it coming. The lad would have died anyway, he was have been injured too badly to survive before anyone realised what was going on."
since when has being stabbed acouple times eliminate all chances of survival? he would have a great chance of survival considering he was on a bus that could quickly transport him to a hospital and there was probably a first aid kit on the bus for immediate attention. the way you talk, knives are more lethal then guns.
A silly first aid kit couldn't have done much, an ambulance arriving on time is also a big if, and I'm not sure if the bus could drive him to a hospital, not if it had hysterical people on it.
"since when has being stabbed acouple times eliminate all chances of survival?"
If stabbed in the chest several times, your chances are rather slim. Your lunch fill up with blood or collaps. Not to mention some articles claim he stabbed the lad in the neck first.
Imperial Forum → Politics → How Safe are your Buses?
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.