• Posts: 545

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

to avoid further hijacking of the EOR awards:


Frenzy says:


-Oldbie stfu ur talking shit....Your fam got 10 planets comp for that and like i said misunderstanding

-Your fam sucks........ Not my problem really

-Oh and note that Raven was talking about p naps we didnt give ur fam a p nap until after the little misunderstanding

-Last edited by Frenzy (Today 13:02:42)




my fam sucks because yours...doesn't have an idea what a 48 hour NAP is.  Super.




Raven Claw says:

-naw 882 is not that good - banking wise they can't keep up
-so it is their attacking force that is keeping them alive, i think i make as much as all their bankers combine.


If our bankers sucked, how do they supply me with necessary money throughout week long wars?  They don't suck, they can only do so many.  Keep in mind that they have had 1/2 the planets to build on than the top 3 fams.  You can't go by our planet count now because we've gained hundreds since warring 876 and 885 and they obv arent all built on.



Frenzy says:

-Yeah that is always a good trick wink

-You guys have taken on two fams does that mean throughout the entire round? Because really thats nothing two brag about


We've taken on more than two fams.  The other fams we've taken on weren't ranked #2 so I didnt mention them.  If you MUST know, we warred 880, with 880 coming out on top.  We warred 890, with them asking for a NAP and not much damage done on either side.  We've warred 881 and got destroyed in the first couple weeks when I was 'inactive'.

So don't preach to me about us only having 2 wars so "we suck" or some crap like that, sir.  We aren't like your family and NAP the top few families, war the ones below those cause they are easy, before NAPing them too.  We have always warred families bigger than us (at the start of the war) the entire round.




hashup12 says:

-I would say that the one top 2 fam they took on was wasy cause all they did was steal unports


First off, you guys started things by stealing my unportalled explorations constantly.  Second, it isn't my fault you didn't portal on fully built planets.  Just because I was clever and took fully built planets with no defense from bankers doesn't mean it was wussy; it was inventive and you're just jealous tongue.
Next, I would like to say I didn't just fight unportalled planets.  Me and Chow went at each other with our fleets, and he never won vs me.  The only planet of mine he ever was able to take was when my fleet was out.  I've also destroyed WOLVERINE's fleet + figs 3 times.
And also note that we worked together with our ally.  I fought you for myself for a week before they attacked you - they explored in your systems, portalled up, then jumped big to take out fleets.  You being sidetracked with me helped that out, and it isn't my fault you guys don't check your systems.  It also isn't my fault that your attacker Chow deleted, as well as 2 bankers.  Boo hoo

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 316

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

1000th post tongue
update tongue

My My My Moma say aligators are angry BeBecause They Got All Them Teeth And And And No Toothbush To Brush Them Them Them With !!!!!!!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,471
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Oldbie pretty much said what i was going to say on the other thread

wink

And.. FYI i think maybe the most captures goes to oldbie also wink


So 882 is crap now r we hammy? We have fought two top 3 families and won the first one and are winning the second one now also..

And i would also like to say to those who sais our bankers were lacking: mcx and tyreal have done very well this round, cheese has done well also but has had vacation etc..  I am being honest now, i didn't do too well in banking this round tongue Tried going pop and it didn't work..

But it was fun to try something new... smile


Good look to fams next round

Also: ill do my next 5 pvc tomorrow i think ..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

1,004 Reply by Frenzy (edited by Frenzy 31-Jul-2008 00:21:24)

  • Posts: 2,603
  • Tag points: 8

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Josh

Dont forget that u begged my fam two p nap yours......882s banking force sucked they have one attacker so they dont actually have an attacking force..Bascially they warred one of the most unorginised fams in IC i know because im their allies...Now they are getting hard about beating them saying that Oldbie is awesome and what not all he did was log on and attack our allies were an expolosion waiting two happen they mostly killed themselves if u read their forums like i did u would know that wink 882 did well to recover from Cloud and Humidity proved how much of a good leader he is by standing firm and making some good decisions smile Oldbie the mouth on u is completely dumb when we cancelled the nap i was talking two you in chat i had more than enough fleet two runs yours and then have Aztek do easy banker raids yet u still had a hardon because you beat our allies only thing that stopped me was because my friendship with Humidity not only that it would have been highly dishonourable...So two answer your question Josh 882 arent shit but they aint as good as ur guys are trying to make them wink

Not only that

Sweden just said not our fault two of ur bankers deleted and one of ur attackers....But when ur branding about the fact u beat a top 5 fam u decided to leave out the crucial detail of... Players were going inactive in the fam u guys attacked i think the leader was inactive ppl were already leaving only ppl that really stayed were Wolv and Thunder and others..... It was a disorginsed rabble and god knows how they made top 5..... What u guys did wasnt impressive

Frenzy
My President is black, infact hes half white so even in a racist mind hes half right wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

1,005 Reply by Humidityold (edited by Humidity 31-Jul-2008 00:29:11)

  • Posts: 1,471
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Begged is such a highly used term and it is not correct. I asked for p-nap, u guys declined. So i never asked again, did some diplo elsewhere got u to realise that there is other fish to fry, got my fam a p-nap wit u guys smile
Secondly, Our banking force sucked?? We had mcx, and tyreal making 50 retakes per year (with me lacking behind due to being lazy tongue) Not only that but they have been making much more than i thought they could.. Theyve done brill..
Our attacking force crap also? Sweden has around 1000-1200 captures this round i think.. You may be a good attacker, but with the amount of naps u guys made, i doubt u have that much.. He has been our lone attacker our ONLY attacker and our fam has 1300+ planets..
Finaly, the most unorganised fams part may be true tongue But we didn't know that at the time, we went to war with 2nd ranked family when we were 8th ourselves i do belive.. 885 were not unorganised and yet we are winning this war too, so you cannot say that it is simply the other families being bad... Plus I dont remember you guys warring a top 5 family this round other than when you were fighting us at bor..
Second finaly, tongue You guys could have finished top in size also this round if u werent so nice to everyone.. Next round i wish to see u guys never makins a single nap unless it is a must.. If you be agressive next round I see you guys FTW wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

1,006 Reply by Raven Claw (edited by Raven Claw 31-Jul-2008 00:43:17)

  • Posts: 397

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

but your banking power isn't strong this round - i was right smile

combine - you guys  bank less than 7 mil - that is my assumption - if i want to be harsh I would you guys make less than 5 mil after your food cost humid.
and i do applaud your attacking powers, but your banking power is just weak


edit:

btw i totally agree with you on the pnaps - i hated the damn pnaps and my whole fam know that i dont like them - i would rather got my ass opped to to like 1 mil pop instead of sitting and doing nothing

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

1,007 Reply by Frenzy

  • Posts: 2,603
  • Tag points: 8

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

The p naps were SHIT

i hated it sad

Frenzy
My President is black, infact hes half white so even in a racist mind hes half right wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,471
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

my fam prolly = you indivudaly on income

congrats on that wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 718
  • Tag points: 21

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

noonw cares about this.
i am teh best.
solar warrior > solar defender > play

so shh tongue

Leader of 9048 in the first ever Imperial Challenge
18.Fam with the most honour: Winner: 9048

2003-12-20 Graduated from Virgo with flying colors!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 545

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

1    XXXPress Alt+f4 gives ironXXX (881) (x:14,y:40)     1647    20913334
4    ~ Euro Cup 2008 ~ (882) (x:31,y:47)     1361    13500725 (with fleet jumps)

i would freaking hope you make more than us as bankers....you are making dumbass statements frenzy, and the mouth on you is worse than on me.  You just don't know when to shut it.

Yes you could have raped our family by not giving us 48 hour notice.  But guess what?  The same could be said about you.  If we wanted to, we could have saved up, jumped everyone and broken NAP with you.  Tables turn with just chatter, eh?  So go back and play with your 19 NAPs and be glad the round is near an end.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

1,011 Reply by [DoN] Barbossa [FbO] (edited by Gwynedd 01-Aug-2008 07:49:54)

  • Posts: 718
  • Tag points: 21

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

how about this, you guys dont understand me.
dont argue about [woof!] EOR awards.
seriously, newsflash, like actually, noone give's a flying dog's testicle about eor awards anymore.

1    **Dons of Pinwheel** (8614) (x:12,y:29)     2312    72699953

that's the benchmark for you nublets.
tongue

Leader of 9048 in the first ever Imperial Challenge
18.Fam with the most honour: Winner: 9048

2003-12-20 Graduated from Virgo with flying colors!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,611
  • Tag points: 19

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

i suggest to stop trying to explain things to frenzy, he cant comprehend alot of things ... i still love him tho smile

882 did great this job, really frustrating for them the whole round, but as we can see the core players stuck around and tbh i didnt think they'd pass 1k planets .. guess what they did. How they did it? it doesn't matter they did it. Infact if round was abit longer i think they'd pass 881 seeing as they didnt punk out and nap everyone like scared girls.

Banking? forever beat 882? yes he did, but again he had 1mil naps to ensure such a thing, and he didnt even get #1 income ... with all those naps you'd figure they'd have top banker ...

Top attacker? not in 881 either, sweden probaly has more captures than that entire fam put together with his hands behind his back. I knew sweden was a good player we just ran into some miscommunication early in the round and i thought he went inactive ... guess what he did great job guy.

~ Cloud

"I Cannot Awake From This Nightmare As Long As You Exist..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 397

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

ehh wtf cloud?
i make the most income
you should read the posts. the closest was awesome at 7.5 i am at 10.8 and 9 after food cost with 160 planets


there is no way that 882 can beat 881 in the long run - our bank makes around 3 times as much as them. You can't catch up to something like that.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,611
  • Tag points: 19

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Not nw wise, i'm talking planets the real way to win wink

~ Cloud

"I Cannot Awake From This Nightmare As Long As You Exist..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 397

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

unless they have pnap with 874 - they will get rape by them - littledogs makes as much as them


when my fam cancelled on 882 - god it was sad because aztek and frenzy don't follow through to kill them off.  If they follow through like any good attacker would have - 882 wouldve been below top 10 again.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366
  • Tag points: 6

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

benchmark ?


what about this round


    Family    Planets     Networth
1    TDF FAMILY (8667) (x:8,y:24)     2733    175225606
2    VETS R US (8659) (x:32,y:7)     3052    159242970
3    :.LOST.: Thisyearsmostopen (8678) (x:44,y:50)     2308    66307620

http://www.ic-wiki.com/index.php?title= … rsmostopen

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,611
  • Tag points: 19

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

none of those fams deserved their ranks ...

~ Cloud

"I Cannot Awake From This Nightmare As Long As You Exist..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,047
  • Tag points: 17

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

if u ask me 882 and 887 (the EC fam's) both deserve 1st and 2nd rank in nw and size i think there the best 2 fams this round, and for the rest of u bitching about them u can all stfu... just because they have done extremley well use are all gelous i think use should all look at them and think to ur self i should take a leaf out of there book.....

and as for attacking they did really well, co-ordanated together between the 2 fams and killed of other fams....

oh and as for ec-sweeden i kicked his ass in fighting earlyer in the round so i must be a damn good attacker too.... but maby thats because my fams income was probley higher and he couldent re build fleet quick enough, because i know with my fams war against 885, i couldnt fight back to them reason being was family's income wasent high enough for me to build a fleet and fight back every time i got a fleet they would destroy it in less than 15 hours

gilmour999

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,047
  • Tag points: 17

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

no affense to u ec-sweeden u ended up doing better than me so yeh...

gilmour999

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

1,020 Reply by AweXomE B(.)(.)BS (edited by Gwynedd 01-Aug-2008 07:50:06)

  • Posts: 2,821
  • Tag points: 8

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

> [DoN] Barbossa [FbO] wrote:

> how about this, you guys dont understand me.
dont argue about [woof!] EOR awards.
seriously, newsflash, like actually, noone give's a flying dog's testicle about eor awards anymore.

1    **Dons of Pinwheel** (8614) (x:12,y:29)     2312    72699953

that's the benchmark for you nublets.
tongue


what was that the one of.... two? rounds you actually stayed active for barbie? tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 545

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

yeah gilmour you did everything right vs me...

It just has to do with guessing what your enemy is gonna do, and when you have backup attackers like BMW that are also solid attackers, it does nothing but help your side.  I couldn't stop you from going after my bankers cross tick, and the only break I got in our war was getting portals in before you found them.

As for 881 running their mouths here, they keep referring to breaking the 48 hour NAP as OK and they should have raped us while they broke it.  This comment is bogus, and Humi would kick the crap out of Frenzy IRL tongue.  But what 881 failed to mention was that same tick they broke the NAP I was getting through all their bankers and their fleets were clearly falling apart to me.  So it isn't like my family would have been the only one damaged from the NAP break.  Yes you would have eventually gotten my fleet, but I'm talking about what I've been doing all round - take out your bankers and raze their buildings.  It has worked in every war so far (look at anyone in 885 thats a banker).

As for the 885 war, for losing all positioning in sector 2, they are doing ok on retakes.  It seems as if the entire family has gone inactive except for their big attacker though (the other active attacker?/banker deleted with 285 planets) so kudos for SPQR for still trying, and in some cases, making ground.  That deletion screwed their family though in at least size ranking and I noticed that player had just jumped 1 mil in NW so maybe wasted their resources too?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

1,022 Reply by Frenzy (edited by Frenzy 31-Jul-2008 09:03:03)

  • Posts: 2,603
  • Tag points: 8

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

End of the day its  pointless arguement and im gonna be the bigger man tongue And walk away  but Cloud scared girls? I seriously doubt it mate we made u delete didnt we remember? Or do u again have a selective memory tongue

Oldbie i shouldnt have argued u are my king tongue And im sorry

Nah seriously ill hand it two 882 they really did do a great job wink Oh and id kick humis ass in rl!

Not only that im playing ICC and thats more important two me than PW wink But Oldbie ill stay next round i was planning two go merger and ill show you how good i am smile

Frenzy
My President is black, infact hes half white so even in a racist mind hes half right wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 545

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

By no means did I say you suck.  You guys just got in a position where you chose to get top rank in NW over having fun / frustration during the round with huge wars.  Some might enjoy that....people that can't simply be on every day it is perfect for, and for some it may be boring and lead to more inactiveness.  It just all depends on your cup of tea I guess if you enjoyed getting number 1 rank (which I hope you do).  I know my family won't come in first in anything, but taking down fams that might have was at least a delight smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,355
  • Tag points: 54

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

1    **Dons of Pinwheel** (8614) (x:12,y:29)     2312    72699953


I remember that round well barbie tongue

Mw had just finished so i randomned into PW mid round and landed in Knights of PW ranked 11th just a couple of days before your fam declared war on us yikes

Yr fam was 3-4x our NW and you thought youd gain some easy planets.

But you didnt- you actually finished DOWN in planets and after 4-5 days your fam asked us for NAp big_smile

that must have been a very weak PW round for yr fam to get to the top tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,471
  • Tag points: 4

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

ROFL

wow killed barbies bubble in one swoop there tongue

Also i would kick hammys ass IRL tongue Remember the boxing match eh? tongue lol nah we drew X(

Also, thanks to those who say my fam and allies done well.. In pw most families dont seem to work together with thier allies enough.. Before we started war with 885, both my family and allies combined networth was = to that of 885 and well we managed to do alright on the war smile

This has been one of my favourite rounds for a long time, simply due to not infrawhoring and warring alot.. Next round i will do my usual cf/to because simply put, Im shit at pop hahaa tongue

Also, the only war we didn't win was the 880 war.. They were more prepared for us etc, so i guess i gotta hand it to them there.. But yeah.. Good round overall smile


WELL PLAYED GAYS big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points