1 (edited by ☭ Fokker 27-Jul-2008 07:11:19)

Topic: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7526544.stm

_Obama Calls For Strong UK Links

White House hopeful Barack Obama has said a strong transatlantic relationship is needed to deal with a wide range of world issues.
Mr Obama said co-operation with the UK was crucial over climate change, terrorism and the economy, after talks with UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
He said his conversation with Mr Brown in Downing Street had been "terrific".
The Democratic presidential candidate later met Conservative leader David Cameron at the Houses of Parliament.
Mr Obama and Mr Brown talked for two hours and then took a stroll in the sunshine around Horse Guards Parade before the Illinois senator spoke to reporters.

_Heavy price

Speaking outside Downing Street, Mr Obama, who is on the final part of the European leg of his tour, also thanked the British people for their support in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"I know that the troops here in Great Britain have borne a heavy price for wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan and I think the American people are grateful for all the help that has been provided," he said.
"The prime minister's emphasis - like mine - is on how we can strengthen the trans-Atlantic relationship to solve problems that can't be solved by any single country individually," he added.
Mr Obama spoke of a "deep and abiding affection for the British people in America and a fascination with all things British".
He also referred to a shared history and the role of the "English tradition" in shaping the US constitution.
"We've been through two world wars together," he said.
"We speak a common language. We share a belief in rule of law and due process."

_Photo opportunity

Earlier, Mr Obama had a breakfast meeting in London with former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who is now the international Middle East envoy.
Mr Obama and Mr Cameron spent almost an hour talking in the Tory leader's Commons office. Shadow foreign secretary William Hague and shadow chancellor George Osborne also attended part of the meeting.
The Tory leader highlighted some of Parliament's features as they posed outside for photographs before the talks.
A Conservative party spokeswoman said their conversation had focused on Afghanistan - including a comparison of their recent personal visits to the country - Iraq, Iran and the economy.
Mr Obama has already visited Germany, where he gave a keynote foreign policy speech in Berlin, and France where he met President Nicolas Sarkozy.
After flying into London on Friday, Mr Obama was greeted by the American ambassador and his wife, Robert and Maria Tuttle, before being taken to a city centre hotel.
In contrast to the public reception he received in Berlin and Paris, Mr Obama's London visit was kept deliberately low key.

_Opinion polls

In Paris, Mr Obama said Iran should not wait for the next US president to be elected before resolving its dispute with the West.
He said Tehran should promptly accept an international call to freeze its "illicit nuclear programme".
Iran insists its nuclear campaign is peaceful.
Mr Obama's tour has also taken in the Middle East where he visited Jordan, Israel and the Palestinian territories.
The senator left London in the afternoon on a chartered plane to fly back to the US where he faces Republican rival John McCain in November's presidential election.
The latest opinion polls in the US show Mr Obama leads Mr McCain by between one and six percentage points with some polls showing the race tightening in key states.
Mr Obama said he was unsure what political impact his overseas trip would have among US voters concerned about fuel prices and their mortgages.
He told reporters in London: "I wouldn't even be surprised that in some polls you saw a little bit of a dip as a consequence. We've been out of the country for a week."
He added: "The reason that I thought this trip was important is that I am convinced that many issues that we face at home are not going to be solved as effectively unless we have strong partners abroad."
__________

So Obama wants a stronger relationship between the UK and the USA. It is almost like he is pretending we are still an important country; how nice of him to pander to our delicate British egoes, but it does not distract from what in my opinion is a very important question: Why?

Let us say, for the sake of the argument, that the UK and the USA do get close enough to cuddle by the fire. Then what? Will this have an impact on the rest of the world, will this achieve or help to achieve anything actually important other thank making the UK an even bigger terrorist target than it already is?
Did you know that since our boys got sent to fight a war that Bush and his penthouse pet Blair started all of the bins in all of the major UK cities have had to have been replaced with bomb proof chunks of metal? We didn't even have to do that for Sinn Feinn, and we deserved their wrath!


But who cares if we the people (These words ring a bell?) got dragged into a war that we the people did not want, who cares if all we have gotten out of our relationship for the last decade is a legacy of terrorism that makes Sinn Feinn look like a retarded child playing with sparklers, just so long as we can pretend that these are still the good old days of Reagan and Thatcher!

Remember those days boys? Remember when Reagan shook our hand while behind the scenes your fellow countrymen funded Sinn Feinn terrorists? Yes, terrorists. Does that tasty bite of hypocrisy stick in yout throat? It should.

And then you somehow convinced that clinical psychopath Blair to jump into an illegal war his own people did not want (good god did we not want this war), and for what? Did you not have the tools and manpower for the job? Of course you did, you have the biggest military force on the bloody planet. No, we were pulled in to legitimise the damn thing.

And why? Because you kept waving those damn IOUs from WW2 over our heads... well the debt has been paid. Now this is not to say I am not greatfull for what your grandfathers did, my grandfather has regailed me many times with stories about his Yank an Canuck mates, their bravery, courage, and cheap chocolate, but I have to wonder what they would think if they knew America was using that as leverage to shove us around, some good old fasioned emotional blackmail. Well, what would they think?

Yeah what a great relationship! I cannot wait for it to go from strength to strength!

But that is not to say I think the link between us should be broken, because I don't. Hell even if I did think that it could not be done! We speak the same language, watch the same films, read that same books, we even share the same history, and that kind of tie can never be broken, but what has this relationship been like for US over the last few decades? Has it been beneficial or costly?
And what of the future? Do you see benefit or cost for the UK?

So, one more time: Obama wants a stronger relationship between the UK and the USA. Why?

[edit = spelling]

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

You're in Afghanistan because you have a NATO commitment to help us defend ourselves.  If you don't like that, then pull out of NATO.

Carter's FBI started busting up the IRA arms suppliers in this country, and Reagan's FBI kept after them.  Pretending that Boston and New York mafia made policy for "our country" is silly.  I think it is a nice gesture of friendship that we bothered, after all, it didn't harm us a bit to sell arms for foriegn currency.

You mustn't ask what results a foriegn policy is supposed to produce.  That is extremist talk, it means you're either a communist or a neocon instead of a centrist who realizes the importance of dialogue with everybody /sarcasm

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

I think Obama said the relationship needs realigning.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

> TheYell wrote:

> You're in Afghanistan because you have a NATO commitment to help us defend ourselves.  If you don't like that, then pull out of NATO.

Carter's FBI started busting up the IRA arms suppliers in this country, and Reagan's FBI kept after them.  Pretending that Boston and New York mafia made policy for "our country" is silly.  I think it is a nice gesture of friendship that we bothered, after all, it didn't harm us a bit to sell arms for foriegn currency.

You mustn't ask what results a foriegn policy is supposed to produce.  That is extremist talk, it means you're either a communist or a neocon instead of a centrist who realizes the importance of dialogue with everybody /sarcasm<

Bravis! I do not think you could have missed the point any further, or avoided the question any better. Bravis!
__________

> Mace wrote:

> I think Obama said the relationship needs realigning.<

First let me thankyou for not doing what Yell just did.
Secondly: Realigning sounds more realistic, more like what we need. I think.

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

You made a bunch of factual errors in that screed and I pointed them out to you.  The answer to your question is that American policy under McCain and Obama has no purpose other than to look stylish.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

you are in afganistan to protect narco routes Karzai is managing

7 (edited by &#9773; Fokker 27-Jul-2008 13:56:40)

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

> TheYell wrote:

> You made a bunch of factual errors in that screed and I pointed them out to you.<

Of course there were factual errors, it was a rant... jeez, did IQ's drop sharply while I was away?


>The answer to your question is that American policy under McCain and Obama has no purpose other than to look stylish.<

That's what I figured, I just needed to hear it from someone else. Thanks.

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

What is really funny is the Taliban, who ruled Afghanistan kept up the supply of Tar Heroin.
What the Euros and the UN believed was the numbers the TALIBAN told them was the Heroin crop.   Of course that was false.

Why is that ??  Because the source of Taliban funding now, is STILL the Heroin crop.
So much for "Religious" righteousness.



As to the US, UK alliance.......  the US, UK and Canada, Aussie will ALWAYS be in together when one or the other is attacked.

When the UK sent a fleet to Argentina, the US turned the other way.  Even though, we always vowed protection from aggression from any powers that intruded on South and Central America.

Yea....the World Wars.....Even w/o a UK alliance, it was given that the US would be in to fight not only w/the UK in WW1 but vs. tyranny and military aggression in WW2.

In this fight on Terror.....to equate Sinn Fein w/Al Qaeda is just stupid.  One was political the other is Religious.  One was very isolated, the other global. 

YOU in the UK were attacked by Al Qaeda.  You had home grown Islamists attack your subway system.
The Spanish were attacked, and decided to go hide in a cave with the Shoe Maker, French style.

The US was attacked first, in a grand style, but it was a target that killed scores of people that were citizens of other countries as well.

The UK, rightfully so, joined the US to eradicate not only the Taliban, and the Al Qaeda home country, but to eradicate the number one funder of terrorist organizations as a nation state.   AND....to set an example to those that are also nation state terror funders.   Pakistan...some what, Saudi Arabia and Lybia have all changed their ways.

If YOU are wanting to hide in a cave,......move to SPAIN and surrender like they did. 


As to OBAMA......   he is a tool.
the Bastard will be back in his Chicago slum, robbing the poor blacks of their Dignity in the next six months.
Thats if the Rev. Wright doesnt have him eliminated in the near future.

Come .......joust w/the master.
I'm always Right.   You are just intellectually Left.....behind.
Individual patriot, and a REAGAN Conservative.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

how dare you BW! Obama is a citizen of the world, like Bono and Gorby!

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

> Black_Wing wrote:

> What is really funny is the Taliban, who ruled Afghanistan kept up the supply of Tar Heroin.
What the Euros and the UN believed was the numbers the TALIBAN told them was the Heroin crop.   Of course that was false.<

Yup. And even after that display of utter stupidity the EU still wonders why the UK won't fully join.


>Why is that ??  Because the source of Taliban funding now, is STILL the Heroin crop.
So much for "Religious" righteousness.<

I always get a little giggle out of that one too


>As to the US, UK alliance.......  the US, UK and Canada, Aussie will ALWAYS be in together when one or the other is attacked.<

Aye, for better or worse. Stupid language.


>When the UK sent a fleet to Argentina, the US turned the other way.  Even though, we always vowed protection from aggression from any powers that intruded on South and Central America.<

Are you talking about the Falklands? The islands we have ruled, uncontested, for 150 years? The islands the Argies keep wanting to take "back" by force because there's a zonking huge oil reserve under there? Yeah, that was aggression.


>Yea....the World Wars.....Even w/o a UK alliance, it was given that the US would be in to fight not only w/the UK in WW1 but vs. tyranny and military aggression in WW2.<

I don't want to sound ungreatful, but in WW2 you sat on your hands untill you were attacked. I think originally the plan was to sit it out and shake hands with the winner.


>In this fight on Terror.....to equate Sinn Fein w/Al Qaeda is just stupid.  One was political the other is Religious.  One was very isolated, the other global. <

Terrorism is terrorism.


>YOU in the UK were attacked by Al Qaeda.  You had home grown Islamists attack your subway system.<

Before or after our glorious government publicly pledged allegiance to you AGAINST the will of the people?

>The Spanish were attacked, and decided to go hide in a cave with the Shoe Maker, French style.<

Like I give a crap about Spain.


>The US was attacked first, in a grand style, but it was a target that killed scores of people that were citizens of other countries as well.<

And memebers of other faiths too, like Islam.


>The UK, rightfully so, joined the US to eradicate not only the Taliban, and the Al Qaeda home country, but to eradicate the number one funder of terrorist organizations as a nation state.<

You're beginning to miss the point: We the people didn't want to join. Doesn't that irk your neo-con sense of freedom even a bit? You might not like it, and I understand why, but can you understand the level of wrongness that was involved in that decision, the decision to ignore the will of the people for the sake of good PR in a country that looks down on us anyway? (that's what it feels like)

>AND....to set an example to those that are also nation state terror funders.   Pakistan...some what, Saudi Arabia and Lybia have all changed their ways.<

Wasn't Saudi Arabia already changing anyway, for economic reasons?


>If YOU are wanting to hide in a cave,......move to SPAIN and surrender like they did.<

If YOU are wanting to force countries to run by your rules do it properly and move to Russia and kill Chechnyans.
See, I can play the idiot game too. big_smile


>As to OBAMA......   he is a tool.
the Bastard will be back in his Chicago slum, robbing the poor blacks of their Dignity in the next six months.
Thats if the Rev. Wright doesnt have him eliminated in the near future.<

No argument here. Only an idiot ties to win an election by campaigning in another country whilst having photos taken with leader who everyone knows will be outed by Christmas.
__________

Bono can go spin too big_smile

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

11 (edited by DPS 28-Jul-2008 06:08:10)

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

Fokker when you said "illegal war" were you actually talking about Afghanistan, as people keep bringing up, or Iraq, as would seem to fit the descriptor better.

I'm pretty sure going to Afghanistan was legal, justified, and expected.

As for why a US/UK relationship is important well they've got to have at least one country in every continent that doesn't hate them.

"Only an idiot ties to win an election by campaigning in another country"

Unless he's trying to appear worldly.  America's Global reputation has taken a few hits under Bush, to some people this is quite important, and Obama appearing to try and repair the damage can win these people over.  Also it shows he is capable of holding a conversation with a HoS elevating himself into that peer group.

There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

> DPS wrote:

> Fokker when you said "illegal war" were you actually talking about Afghanistan, as people keep bringing up, or Iraq, as would seem to fit the descriptor better.

I'm pretty sure going to Afghanistan was legal, justified, and expected.<

Give that man a Banana! *claps*


>As for why a US/UK relationship is important well they've got to have at least one country in every continent that doesn't hate them.<

A tactical friendship?


>"Only an idiot ties to win an election by campaigning in another country"

Unless he's trying to appear worldly.  America's Global reputation has taken a few hits under Bush, to some people this is quite important, and Obama appearing to try and repair the damage can win these people over.  Also it shows he is capable of holding a conversation with a HoS elevating himself into that peer group.<

Ah... didn't think of that. Good point.

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

Chechnyians ??  ROFL.

Thats up to you in Europe to take care of.  As long as it is not you, in your country.....its ok.
You really want to go down that road......idiot ??

It took the US military to stop the Serbs from slaughtering non-serbs for another uncontested 18 months while you all in Europe turned a righteous and non-committal to violence blind eye.



You pacifist types in the UK can also join the ranks of the US Leftists as well.   Because, there is hardly a "We the People" Consensus to fight the bastards who wish to kill you and your mothers in the US.


As to the rest of your post FOKKER ??....... nonsense of course.

Come .......joust w/the master.
I'm always Right.   You are just intellectually Left.....behind.
Individual patriot, and a REAGAN Conservative.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

A band of thugs called Sinn Fein wanted to kill Brits.

A global assembly of like-minded Nazis wish to kill anyone that is not of their faith.


No, terrorism and thuggery are NOT the same.

Come .......joust w/the master.
I'm always Right.   You are just intellectually Left.....behind.
Individual patriot, and a REAGAN Conservative.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

> Black_Wing wrote:
> Chechnyians ??  ROFL.
Thats up to you in Europe to take care of.  As long as it is not you, in your country.....its ok.
You really want to go down that road......idiot ??<

Nice spin attempt, shame it doesn't distract; and as for getting tetchy over me making a comment in the same manner as the post it was in response to, well, that speaks for itself.


>It took the US military to stop the Serbs from slaughtering non-serbs for another uncontested 18 months while you all in Europe turned a righteous and non-committal to violence blind eye.<

This is relevant to the discussion about the future of the UK-US relationship how?


>You pacifist types in the UK can also join the ranks of the US Leftists as well.   Because, there is hardly a "We the People" Consensus to fight the bastards who wish to kill you and your mothers in the US.<

What a mature statement, now I am utterly confounded as to why people address you in the disrespective manner that they do.


>As to the rest of your post FOKKER ??....... nonsense of course.<

Say what you like, everyone who counts knows better.


> A band of thugs called Sinn Fein wanted to kill Brits.
A global assembly of like-minded Nazis wish to kill anyone that is not of their faith.<

Actually Sinn Fein tortured and killed Protestants, Protestant Sympathizers, Catholics who were mature enough to put aside idiotic differences and assosciate with Protestants, and even have the gall to marry Protestants.


>No, terrorism and thuggery are NOT the same.<

I know, I've spent 20 of my 29 years living under the very real threat of terrorism.

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

Britain is an unimportant country, the only ally the USA really cares about is Israel due to the powerful pro-Israel lobby in Washington DC.
Britain basically hangs onto the US' coat-tails & helps out in any war the US needs to show it has allies, militarily the US vastly outguns the UK in every department & doesnt really need any help- its just about politics.

Buddugoliaeth neu Marwolaeth

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

I dont think we care about Israel because we keep calling on Israel to be stupid.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

dont u guys give them $3billion in military aid per annum? & thats just the start of it. any potential succesful Presidential candidate has to be pro-Israel. you see the Israeli lobbyists in DC have got you guys locked down. a superpower of 300million ppl controlled by a small nation that cant be more than 6million people. strange isnt it?

Buddugoliaeth neu Marwolaeth

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

"Britain is an unimportant country..."

Not going to repost your entire post but you essentially argue that the UK is insignificant purely because they aren't really necessary in military conflicts.  Now I understand Americans aren't well versed in this but there do exist ways to communicate with people that don't involve guns, it's shocking I know.  To truly understand whether or not good relations with the UK you'd have to look at cultural and economic exchanges as well as military benefits.  What do you sell the UK, what do you buy from the UK, etc.

Imagine a hypothetical situation where the US had a single trading partner who had no military capabilities beyond the defense of their own nation.  By your standard this nation would be unimportant, but without them you go bankrupt.

"any potential succesful Presidential candidate has to be pro-Israel"

or lie.

There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

Ummm, the United States lacks NO NATURAL RESOURCE. I think we might run low on coffee if hard pressed with -NO- trade, but to be frank... Europe would sink faster than we would.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

yes DPS you could lie by pretending to be pro-Israel, but again you are very limited to what u can do when you get to power. the lobbyists are powerful. why do you think the palestinians are so mad against America? it would go along way for the US to show they were a bit more even to both sides, but again the Pro-Israel lobbyists wont stand for that.

Buddugoliaeth neu Marwolaeth

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

Questions:

How many Israeli's throw rocks at Palestinians?

How many Israeli's put bombs on and walk to a Palestinian School bus and try to board it to blow themselves up?

How many Israeli's destroy things given peacefully to them by Palestinians?

How many Israeli's seek the death of all Palestinians?




When you can answer these questions, in full, and with the implied double meaning, you will know why I stand how I stand on Israel.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

How many times has isreal started wars agains their neighbours after WWII

"Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered
automatic weapons."-General Douglas MacArthur
"Cluster bombing from B-52s are very, very, accurate. The bombs are guaranteed
to always hit the ground."-USAF Ammo Troop

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

"Ummm, the United States lacks NO NATURAL RESOURCE. I think we might run low on coffee if hard pressed with -NO- trade, but to be frank... Europe would sink faster than we would."

True the US possesses all the necessary natural resources but the question is a matter of quantity.  Could the farms in the US produce enough food for the people?  For how long?

Regardless the point I meant to convey is tha there are other measures of the importance of a relationship besides military assistance.

There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

Re: Is the US-UK relationship still relevant?

Food is one of the United States larger exports... We produce a significant portion of the worlds food.. I want to say 15% or so, but I am not sure. And we sure the hell will not be desperate for food, even if all fish in the ocean disappear... we make more than enough food here to feed ourselves, Canada, and Mexico and have food to spare for the countless animal pets we would have as well... and leave many fields rotting.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)