401 Reply by Elbe

  • Elbe
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,686

Re: Race for victory in MW

Sore losers.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 518
  • Tag points: 41

Re: Race for victory in MW

Cocanut
Tico didn't get blocked. Meaning there was no IA from his side in this.
Meaning that 03 didn't cause any NAP break.

810 did the same thing on 803 as you know. Broke the PNAP the last tick. Just they failed in raiding 03.
Crappy way of losing a round but yes I'd say Impire acted like a real sore loser. Not your family.

25 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 391 845454 - Dont see them coming back up. Theyre out of the game. Pretender, will finish out of top 30.
------
4 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 945 57233492

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 845
  • Tag points: 12

Re: Race for victory in MW

cya cocanut. have fun away from the game.  Shame you went out so bitter.

hey, 2nd place is still decent mate.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,446
  • Tag points: 70

Re: Race for victory in MW

the fact that tico didnt get blocked doesnt mean there wasnt an IA, it means that the mods couldnt prove it. iv seen raids carried out by two unallied families go unblocked becos in theory they could just be 'coincidental timing on attacks' and becos there was no ingame msg evidence.

I was using a metaphor that means God is watching us. You've heard this, there's a toilet on the roof.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 518
  • Tag points: 41

Re: Race for victory in MW

I know why Tico didn't get blocked. It's cause from his side there was no IA.

25 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 391 845454 - Dont see them coming back up. Theyre out of the game. Pretender, will finish out of top 30.
------
4 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 945 57233492

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,202

Re: Race for victory in MW

rofl a IA always should be commin from both sides. i never heared of a alliance where only one side is part init.
the mods do whot they see fit annyways, unjustice is done often.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 653

Re: Race for victory in MW

803 didnt break shit, its known how Coca is running NAPed families and than 'paying' compensation after killing all fighters and removing spread portals...and all the rest of ppl i cant see ever had more honour either.

803 took planets out of families we warred last few days, and I (personally ME) hit 799 that we had no single NAP with so why not?!?!?!

We did no single illegal thing, Agh was our ally and gave ME few planets as well when we saw 791 taking planets off 809, but for sure he didnt take planets off 791 or someone to pass to us, like 809 did all the time passing to 791, so shut up.

803 won fair and if it was in last 2 ticks than be it, but 803 won!


Also Impire who was calling me names in my family chatroom when i entered without a greeting or a single question but cursing me and being extremly rude you can just be ashamed for your behaviour, if its only a game and you dont care to win than you really need to control yourself, i wasnt even online last tick, as my morale was minus 2 ticks before end, i know from whom i took planets 2 ticks before end, AND i was against NAP with 791 and wondered in my forums all the time why we didnt war you instead of stupid pNAP, have no idea who made it, but for sure we wanted to war you and not pNAP you cause you stole all planets we were winning due to 809 passing them or we blew them and you expoed! Thats low, but from what i saw in chat, i will never expect any reasonable thing from lunitic like you.

Thats all i have to say about Impire, and to all ppl who defend him, you cant be much better with such behaviour, im above you, i never had good opinion about you seeing in what way you 'winning' but your once and only talking to me made sure you are just lunitic and worth of ignorance, thus no more msgs from you.

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

408 Reply by stealthkid (edited by Gwynedd 30-Jul-2008 09:02:22)

  • Posts: 1,685

Re: Race for victory in MW

810 did the same thing on 803 as you know. Broke the PNAP the last tick. Just they failed in raiding 03.
Crappy way of losing a round but yes I'd say Impire acted like a real sore loser. Not your family.

Dude, I'm in 810 and we didn't have a nap or a pnap for that matter.  I was the only attacker attacking 803 and I was about 800k NW, they were bitching at me for retaking.  The only reason I was attacking 803 is because you guys farmed our allies for about 700 planets and had no intention of stopping.  My own family was too scared to attack you, but not me.  I was getting stupid messages from retards saying how they are gonna "burn me to the ground", all i can say is STFU and play and [woof!] game.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 518
  • Tag points: 41

Re: Race for victory in MW

Paininside
Not if you have decided to attack a family, and then a player from another family starts msging you to attack them. And if that player keeps msging you to attack them (even though it was what you were going to do anyways).

That's how it's not IA from Ticos/Legions side.



Also, about Impire, yep his behaviour in chat is really unacceptible in my opinion. He did appologize briefly for it however.

25 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 391 845454 - Dont see them coming back up. Theyre out of the game. Pretender, will finish out of top 30.
------
4 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 945 57233492

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 653

Re: Race for victory in MW

803 had no single NAP with 810, i hit them too ofc, that was another 15ish planets big_smile

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,532

Re: Race for victory in MW

yep stealthkid jumped in my nw range last tick big_smile
another 5 planets... thnx stealthkid tongue

Tobi

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 712
  • Tag points: 522

Re: Race for victory in MW

"803 won fair and if it was in last 2 ticks than be it, but 803 won!"

Thats what you call fair and winning? lol tongue
thats like being in some competition where the person in first gets killed and the 2nd person wins by default tongue
also rumors about the 2nd person hiring the assassin tongue

Whea!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,685

Re: Race for victory in MW

yea, my fam wouldn't even help me get infils on you guys.  Otherwise I could have done a proper raid on you guys on your unportalled planets...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 653

Re: Race for victory in MW

erm evilsheep, yes its victory as 791 didnt do any better but competed to grab as many planets for victory, even had 809 take planets from us and pass them, so yes its victory in last 2 ticks! wont mention where 791 been during all round lol

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

415 Reply by BYS2

  • BYS2
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 170

Re: Race for victory in MW

yo dragon agh, i don't think you know what you're talking about.. 810 had no nap with 803... are you like high or something

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

416 Reply by The Dragon Agh (edited by The Dragon Agh 27-Jul-2008 19:11:45)

  • Posts: 518
  • Tag points: 41

Re: Race for victory in MW

Ok then, I thought they had smile
Or I mean some other fam, dunno. Nvm that though.

25 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 391 845454 - Dont see them coming back up. Theyre out of the game. Pretender, will finish out of top 30.
------
4 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 945 57233492

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 845
  • Tag points: 12

Re: Race for victory in MW

close the thread agh please.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 712
  • Tag points: 522

Re: Race for victory in MW

do mention where 791 had been all round... fighting up the ranks rather than just sitting up there farming... and you cant even call it a victory if a member of your fam got blocked for reasons that i'm not supposed to bring up here lol tongue

you may have won on paper... but i'm sure everyone (who wasnt in that alliance) knows who really won size tongue

Whea!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: Race for victory in MW

just for the record:

Tico didn't do anything to be part of an IA smile

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: Race for victory in MW

and while I'm at it. I'll just close this thread. Size has been determined. No need for this to continue this way

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points