Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

who's planet fat? the only banker bigger than me is a poppie wink

727 (edited by Frenzy 18-Jul-2008 17:36:04)

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Why do u guys trade msgs

Just fight ffs i only msg when i wanna nap

Frenzy
My President is black, infact hes half white so even in a racist mind hes half right wink

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

lol msgs FTW!

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

lol frenzy we are being sociable.

and remember keep your friends close but enemies closer wink

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Sociable

What does that mean

*spits on the floor*

Frenzy
My President is black, infact hes half white so even in a racist mind hes half right wink

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

it means this

*sexes frenzy*


*spits on frenzys ass*

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

im nobody's enemy... im just awexome wink

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

I got as problem with 880, they broke a cease fire with 889, and now they arnt stoping.  I just hate to see PW go through this whole honour thing again.
Im not complaining or anythin but i cant see why so fams will have to go to that sort of length to gain planets.
5th vs 12th, bit of a NW and Size difference.
This game is a conflict and war game, but its also diplomatic, hence the relations page.
Has it gone to the crapper or what. Why not have no relations page and just be all on all. That would sort everythin out i rekon.

Mirislav Klose
Malborcs

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

oh yeah, that would solve EVERYTHING..........................

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Wtf do you mean 879 have no attackers yikes

879 have got two of the best attackers in Pw X(

736

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

886 have sunk like a stone tongue
Kudos to 881. We simply dont got the economy to sustain any kinda war attempt xD
My war jump just wasnt suffice, portals went got ran, ive GC but no res to rebuild lost units - and even if i had it it still wouldnt be enough, dropping nw to duck below attack range isnt an option since it leaves my bankers at the mercy of ya's /woe is me (and my family, ofcourse lol)

Hammy i have given ya planets, now give me loves ;(

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

see selur knows what he on about tongue

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

jup..879 have quality attackers - sucky bankers though..like flash..and oscar..especially flash.

Pixies My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard, and they're like you wanna trade cards?

739 (edited by Frenzy 19-Jul-2008 00:20:40)

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Frodo should not have agreed a cf and then broke it wink

*gives love*

Frenzy
My President is black, infact hes half white so even in a racist mind hes half right wink

740 (edited by gilly999 19-Jul-2008 08:38:24)

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

I got as problem with 880, they broke a cease fire with 889, and now they arnt stoping.  I just hate to see PW go through this whole honour thing again.
Im not complaining or anythin but i cant see why so fams will have to go to that sort of length to gain planets.
5th vs 12th, bit of a NW and Size difference.
This game is a conflict and war game, but its also diplomatic, hence the relations page.
Has it gone to the crapper or what. Why not have no relations page and just be all on all. That would sort everythin out i rekon.

Mirislav Klose
Malborcs


our cf was 24 hours!!!

and also back when michalballblack or wat ever his name is was leader use where trying to vulture from us when we where fighting 882... and use kept attacking us thinking use could beat us and take planets from us so we retaliated and then all ur family does is whine

so we did not break any cf...
and if ur family dident start attacking ours all the time we would have left use alone ur fam must have attacked us over 20 times befor we retaliated

gilmour999

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

315 planet(s) captured by gilmour999

146 planet(s) lost by gilmour999.

92 attack(s) without capture by gilmour999.

110 planet(s) explored by gilmour999.


plus anther 16 captures this yr with no loses yet

any other attackers got better than that ???? there probley is but just wonder how i compare

gilmour999

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

does any 1 know how accurate the family news summarizer is ??? is it 100% accurate or not ?

gilmour999

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

I'm not sure if it's 100% accurate.

I have 475 and Weirdos has 460 captures, but we both lost around 300 each because of wars and whatnot. And neither of us are very active hmm

744

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Well hammy my fams round has been over for a while now, you guys raided Batman and he went inactive straight away - my banker  lol - and the other 2-3 bankers didnt seem to have much of a clue about banking and the one who did simply didnt log half as often as they needed to.

Was just a last ditch attempt at having a little fun this round anyway tongue

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

For those who dont know who i am ingame
I am forever in 881. You guys probably dont care, but it is time for me to go inactive and just sit here:). Round has become too boring. We are only fighting 886. How freaking boring is that. Boring = inactivity.

I have several things to say in case I am not here for EOR voting.


Selur/Brimstone - mmm i think 74/85/76 can tell you guys that you guys did a great job. Nothing else needed.
Littledogs - income wasn't high at bor - I did SOTs before/after. I was at his level pop banking second week I think.

Awesome - god this round you have just become annoying. Stop bothering me about income. Look at your damn planet count. You have twice as much planets as me. You should of course do better than me. Pop gives fake nw. But in the end, if I do play the whole round, I wouldve won top banker of this round for sure. Why? - because everyone just looks at nw and thinks thats what make income.  Good luck in ruling banking smile. Btw my max was 6 mil. I dropped a bit after losing couple planets.

Templare - too bad man sad, just bad luck for you

Chow - wish you good luck smile, you will do great

Cloud - if he is still here looking - well too bad shit happens, if he lands in your fam - you should decide two things - either give him leadership and live if whether he is inactive or not. If you dont like him, delete. Stop flaming him for stupid reasons that you guys put yourself in. (882)

Xeno - god, this guy is one of the biggest idiot I ever saw in IC. And he is great example that NW does not equal to income!!!

ME = I can't handle pop banking - I am not good enough to do it without the old strats available sad. That sums it all. I am a better cf/to banker because I contribute more and make the same income without have some much exposure + I op the shit out of players. Btw props to render and communist in my fam for doing a decent banking job.

Keerb = damn you for going inactive, because now i am following you sad

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Rock'n roll!

747

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Members in family #876, Back in the Saddle again(58,5) as of Week 8, 9



worse fam ive ever been in - we finally jump an attacker and he deletes -  what crap


dont get me wrong some nice people in there - leader is a good guy - the rest dont care - they got there own SS 3 man teams and thats it


ill see you all next round pw as camaar this time

748

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

and a message to chow - you dont tell people your off work so can be jump - then jump with loads of fam resource then delete !


idiot

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

dont worry, we're taking care of 876 tongue

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

tymo..we ran 150k of his figs, then he deleted. xx

Pixies My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard, and they're like you wanna trade cards?