Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Ive seen exactly the same collaboration between 85 & 76 that oldbie is talking about.

not once or twice but repeatedly for most of the round.

I dont expect them to admit it.

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

> Raven Claw wrote:

> @oldbie
maybe you are just annoying and people want to hit you

have you ever thought about that?



Annoying how?  I never talk on the boards like you ladies do, only recently have I made a few posts.  And if I come off annoying its after the fact that people attacked me tongue

578 (edited by Humidity 14-Jul-2008 12:54:24)

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

""hmmm hummi i would like prof that its an IA your attacker gets 1 attack by 2 different families in same tick and you scream IA give it up and find something else to whine about. My family is clearin all non naped families from close to us if it envolves 874,887,892,883,891,882,ect...... thats who gets cleared deal with it they have.""

When did i even whine? I logged on with messages from you guys telling me not to whine cos you guys hit me i was like WTF i aint even seen whats happened yet.. Your fam is too anti-whining tongue

Thr only reason i would ever suggest ia is because the fact that what oldbie explained and not only that but planets that were in a system that only 876 were in we had both 885 and 876 clearing the planets we owned and never once hitting eachother as though they were co-ordinating.. I merely said, i smell an IA and never spoke of it again.. I dont realy care much we have lost 50 planets from 876 and 885 together this year and we have took 41..

And if you will notice i never came to the forums about my thoughts on the IA or went to a mod cos I didn't see it neccassary.. However, you thought it in yourself to come bring it to the forums when no one else was talking bout it.. Makes me wonder why you would be so quickly to bring this news to the forum..

Guilty conscience perhaps?

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

i think you guys are on crack or smth...does the notion `checking for intruders` and ` clearing` your systems means anything to you? the guy from 882 explores or gets in atleast 10 systems in which i am, including throwing a 600+lasertrap 2 ticks away from our HS (885) and do you expect me to just leave him there?
does it ever occurred to you that, because we and 876 are napped, we share alot of systems and thus it`s more than likely that if 876 doesn`t clear you we will or viceversa? so keeping an eye on your systems and clearing non napped intruders is considered nowadays IA? how is it our fault that both we and them have active players who check systems on a daily basis and clear the intruders?

i will say this once and for good- i have never cooperated with anyone in 76, didn`t exchanged a single message the whole round with any of them, i don`t use irc or msn in 2 years now, so enough with this bs talk...

and about what oldbie complained- that i `destroyed` his fleet- is it my fault he had his figs out? i barely did 2 attacks, took out 10k of them, then he reacted and stationed them...so what`s the big deal?

.

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

that was one system where he was 2 (camaar) ticks from you hs.. 8 ticks for a normal banker.. the other systems you hit from us where systems where it would have been round 4-6 ticks for a cammar which is around 20 ticks for a banker.. and yet you still attack those? ones that you werent even inside in the first place..

All i said was i smell an IA in a personal message to a member of 876(or885 i forget) and didnt mention it anywhere and you (or 876 im not sure who is who on forums) come on here and start complaining about it..

581 (edited by The Assassin 14-Jul-2008 14:08:43)

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

selur we are just  clearing you from sect 2 and 885 seems to have the same thing in mind i could site countless times we have fleets hovering but cant take cuz 885 has already cleared you and like i said if it is an IA prove it. i haven't talked to maxitron since i was in his family 2 rounds ago and i couldnt tell you any of the people that are in 885 they aren't my allies so i could care less we only naped the because our allies naped they plain and simple nothing more if it wasnt for that we would still be fighting over sect 2

draculas> my daughter just made cheerleading squad
Squeaky> ...is she hot?
draculas> shes 12 sicko
Squeaky> oh damn

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

last couple of posts are 2 long for god sake does anyone care about this now its getting boring i cba to even read them now because everyone is repeating everyone else over and over

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

i am awexome


better? smile

584

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

i do repeat myself

i do repeat myself

i do repeat myself

so on...(repeating more than 3 is considered spam)

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

your mom should be considered spam bc she repeated herself in bed about.... 69 times last night tongue

UPDATE!!!!!

586

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

lemme see...69 times, 12 hours....60*12=720 minutes / 69 times=10.5 minutes per time, considering u didnt stop for lunch, thats a good ratio...an awexome ratio.

hmm

Now i understand she didnt want milk for breakfast

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

since when does night last 12 hours? tongue

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

i bet only bankers would do that calculation also tongue

lazy ass attackers X( ppft

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

where do you think you came from render? wink

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

> cioby wrote:

> i think you guys are on crack or smth...does the notion `checking for intruders` and ` clearing` your systems means anything to you?


So how does this explain 885 attacking me in 876's sector in systems they didn't share with me?  Would like to know your bullshit response to that one.

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

the only sector we have is sector 2 and 885 is all over in this sector also so how would i explain that also hmm idk maybe its called a nap

draculas> my daughter just made cheerleading squad
Squeaky> ...is she hot?
draculas> shes 12 sicko
Squeaky> oh damn

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

i want a PvC of myself

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Big ass long posts smile

Frenzy
My President is black, infact hes half white so even in a racist mind hes half right wink

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

The clitoris is a sensitive organ and it's function is to provide sexual pleasure. It is a hard round 'button' at the top of the vulva. It

Smugglas
Our lies are true untill the truth be proven

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Its about shit really tongue

Stop googling naughty words tongue

Frenzy
My President is black, infact hes half white so even in a racist mind hes half right wink

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Here's my PvC:

Contenders ftw: 876, 881 and 885/874 depending on how the war theyre in goes and if it ends soon. If it doesnt end too soon it's only 876, 881 and 885 up there.

Pretenders ftw: everyone inside top 10 not mentioned.

Pretenders top 10: rank 11-15.

Contenders for deletion: rank 16-20


*dances*

je

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

Oh and - contenders for sexiness = 879 for having the sexiest players.

je

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

u kidding me???

asking for updates already its been less than 24 hours since the last 'proper' one

(sorry keerb tongue )

599 (edited by DiqitalOne 15-Jul-2008 00:46:12)

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

I didnt noticed your new PvC on page 22, nice report smile

600

Re: Pretenders Vs. Contenders PW Round 43

noobs.