Hathir wrote:I would agree with that assessment, although the same could be said for either networth or planets.
Networth and planets count actually makes sense cause they provide a lot of information to you. E.g. high planet = banker/resourcer, a huge nw increase = fleet jump, etc.
I think score on the other hand, for individual players, tells you nothing. And like Orion said, possibly even harmful. For fams, it kind of tells you how the fam did overall. For example if you look at the *Cars* fam, if you only saw planets and NW, you would think they are a terrible fam, but if you look at score, you realize that something happened to them and it was due to the mistake made in the war. Or if you look at se7ven and Rogue One, you realize they were playing from behind and made a huge comeback in NW.
Rank Family Planets Networth Score
1 Hunting Angels (3679) [37,22] 1271 13133765 118660
2 THE U.S. MARINE CORPS 1916 (3683) [22,42] 1485 9514191 118529
3 *Cars* (3681) [39,61] 490 10225426 111886
4 Dark Angels (3680) [77,32] 802 8530875 103860
5 se7en (3685) [62,51] 859 13647096 88360
6 Rogue One dont drive cars (3684) [57,6] 761 11911177 87732
7 slammed (3682) [21,79] 478 6803623 67738
8 Penelope Pitstops Pink Pussies (3678) [77,72] 338 3795638 44439
I do think score has some uses for fams, but completely useless for individual players
(side note: if you look at top list, you further see that rogue one is top in production for pretty much everything which I find impressive. Props to you guys)
0rion wrote:In that case: In imperial history: include both score, size and nw wins of your family too?
Fam rankings would be nice, feels like that is more important anyways