1 Topic by k!ngs (edited by Undeath 24-Feb-2016 17:25:37)

  • Posts: 237
  • Tag points: 18

Topic: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Week 41, 18 Save - Reply
hey man, we are already at war...

and got ass raped by 73.
So plz don't do this

Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 43, 18 Save - Reply
we just lost 68 planets to 73 taking advantage about the morale crap so i think that proofs it.

Just stay out of our war plz
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 2, 19 Save - Reply
Plz cancel this nap cancelation. 67 doesn t want to nap and we are fighting over 400 of our planets due to yhe stupid morale system. Even right now we still have the savings to crush them but we cannot jump as morale is our wirst problem. They took 300 of our banker planetd while it took us 36 hours to remove their attackers. In that time they manage to portal new planets cause we simply couldn t retake fast enough, again the morale crap.

Plz, let us continue our fight withiut having to worry avout you guys...
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 24, 19 Save - Reply
Not polite not to speak when spoken to:-) i am drunk btw
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 37, 19 Save - Reply
I hope you are proud of yourselfs mother[GIANT PIG FARMER]ers...

We were just about to be able to fight back after what happend to us in our war with 67. Now you are ruining that for us.
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 38, 19 Save - Reply
i got an idea...

I give you planets if you nap us again. Loads of planets. Just can't ask where they came from but it will be a fam p napped to you so they can't touch them :-)
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

--------

This is where he finally realises I will not negotiate.

--------

Week 9, 20 Save - Reply
you must be the biggest idiot in this game no doubt...

and that's a title you can be proud of, cause there are a lot of idiots around in this game. But you won the biggest idiot award lol
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 9, 20 Save - Reply
dude, i have never seen a bigger noob then you. Do you even know what you are doing or are you just randomly pressing buttons lol...

you are so pathetic its no longer funny. Maybe you should hit my portals again, see how your transporters crash into the ground lol
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 10, 20 Save - Reply

You are just interfering with our war and that's just sad. You probably feel big now but in fact you wouldn't stand 2 ticks if we were to focus on you instead of 67 lol

Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

2 Reply by Epiknicedude (edited by Undeath 24-Feb-2016 17:26:10)

  • Posts: 134
  • Tag points: 1

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

I've got some more of that aswell big_smile

Week 45, 17 Save - Reply
can you plz stay out of our upcomming war?
Our relations with 1967 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 6 weeks.

thx
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 48, 17 Save - Reply
can you plz answer?
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 13, 18 Save - Reply
Plz stay out of our fight, it doesn t concern you. Would be much appreciated...
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 23, 18 Save - Reply
Come on man, don t vulture, we have a hard time as it is. Already down 300 planets due to morale rules
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 23, 18 Save - Reply
Come on man, my fam is gonna delete. We have a hard rime and we really don t need this
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 23, 18 Save - Reply
That is cause 67 raided those players already... We are at war, lost 300 planets cause they only went for bankers znd we czn t do lore then one attack a tick on them with these stupid morale rules...

Stop being pathetic and stay out of our fight
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 23, 18 Save - Reply
Go [EAT A GIANT BAG OF SKITTLES] your self pathetic loser
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 24, 18 Save - Reply
what a total cock you are!!!
Signed, WarChild UK of The Replicators (#1966)

Week 38, 19 Save - Reply
plz man, not again!
71 is warring us, 67 is warring us... that's enough!
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 38, 19 Save - Reply
we can't remove you cause it's 100% morale for one attack and we are still 100% at war with 67. We need those planets to kick them back.

It took me 3 days to be somewhat able to take back most of what 67 took from us, we are now finally able to start hitting them so plz, stop, i am begging you
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 39, 19 Save - Reply
why do you only hit us then? 67 has less fleet then us...
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 39, 19 Save - Reply
we gave you a nap when you asked for it.. So we didn't remove you of course.

Also we need all of our morale for our wars now so we can't remove you

and i never attack fams so small when being big.

I wonder what you 'll do when you are in my position next round........
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 39, 19 Save - Reply
Fine, just ouck on 67 equally then. That way our war stays balanced
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 49, 19 Save - Reply
You again.....................
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

------------------

By the way i never asked for a NAP of any kind

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Lol, i got no problem with losing. But who did we lose to???
Yeah we took a beating from 67 cause they didn't jump and we did, good tactics from their side but the whole reason it was possible is the stupid morale change that 67 doesn't like either. But i got no problem with admitting we took a beating there. We also recovered pretty good from that beating and were able to take back a lot of our losses and even hit them back in their core.

What does piss me off however is that both of you cancel nap on us while we are taking a beating and find it funny to take over 150 planets of us while we have a hard time fighting 67 and don't have the morale or the ressies to come after both of you.

You guys are what is killing 67. When morale rule didn't excist you'd bottem feed all the time. With the new rules you stay small and annoy everybody that put a lot of work and effort in making this game fun for the entire fam.

You deserve each other... Maybe get into the same fam, and let me know which one it is so i can nuke you 100 times every day next round as i will not be playing, just gonna be here to annoy those who thought it was funny to abuse a shitty morale rule and vulture during a war.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 134
  • Tag points: 1

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

just listen to what you are saying.. 

"When morale rule didn't excist you'd bottem feed all the time."

That's exactly why i did it to you and will keep doing it.
I've provoked everyone in this galaxy and everyone took it like a man except for you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 237
  • Tag points: 18

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

I though I was the only one...... What a frustrated horrible person.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

There was a time that the whole community would now cancel on you and hit you. But that was before official (p)naps and morale bullshit that makes it impossible to even touch scum like both of you.

I am happy i introduced you guys to each other, a match made in heaven>.

And if you look at my post you can see i asked you guys to stop nicely like 15 times, even after 73 took 68 planets in 10 minutes and was proud of it...  Even after 71 cleared 3 systems with fam members and killed fleet we desperatly need to avoid new 67 raids...

But enough is enough.

also very nice how both of you don't post any of your replies

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,040
  • Tag points: 17

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Here's more he sent to Donald LOl

2
IC Death
27-Jan-2016 18:53:07
IC Death
Solar Legend
Offline
Posts: 186
Tag points: 186
Re: 1966 Begging ingames..
Week 7, 18 Save - Reply
we weren't even gonna do much more then clearing our core. Can you at least talk to me? We spend to much time building all that to see it all get destroyed.
Come on man!
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)
Week 7, 18 Save - Reply
there s no need for this man, come one
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)
Week 7, 18 Save - Reply
Ok ok, you have made your point, almost up 150 planets. We made a bad call. Was hoping you d a t least jump up with us like the old days.
Howlong you gonna continue this?
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)
Week 6, 18 Save - Reply
ok well i have had it...
24 hour nap was not my idea, napping you was about giving you time to handle 72, but i never said it had to be 24 hours nap.
Warring you was only about having a bit of fun but this is no fun at all.
So whenever you are ready just lemme know and we end this pooooooooooooooooooooooo so i can go back to doing stuff in rl that actually matter lol.
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,040
  • Tag points: 17

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

we still got lot's of savings, at least we can punish 71 if we end this now. You got over 350 planets. Can we plz end this, and plz don't go offline again until i am in bed.
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 47, 18 Save - Reply
my leader is online now, and so am i.....
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 45, 18 Save - Reply
you p napped to 71?
cause if you read uni news maybe we should make them suffer instead of continue fighting each other...

just so you know, we got another set of vultures on our hands...
Our relations with 1971 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 48 weeks.
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Week 41, 18 Save - Reply
been asking for a nap for days, but i was asleep.
So lemme know and we sign on the spot!
Signed, FBI of The Azgard (#1966)

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 275
  • Tag points: 13

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Classless airing of dirty laundry. The IC community is embarrassing and you guys should be ashamed of yourselves.

mbvX, jamjam, nobody, smax

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

lol i didnt air anything to the public only my fam

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,611
  • Tag points: 19

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Again shows the poor community of this game and why only 20 people play anymore

~ Cloud

"I Cannot Awake From This Nightmare As Long As You Exist..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,040
  • Tag points: 17

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

You know damn well this is not the reason why people don't play anymore, cats should not press send if they say something stupid dumb or that might get them in trouble, Truthfully i posted this because i hate to see Adults men beg it's pathetic!

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

13 Reply by RareUK (edited by RareUK 02-Feb-2016 18:00:05)

  • RareUK
  • RareUK
  • Imperial Activist
  • Offline
  • Posts: 569
  • Tag points: 29

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Yeah is a proper weak move posting private messages in the main forums.

Azgard (FBI) is a great player, he has been extremely active all round, and he has lead a solid attack.

Despite the rubbish morale system, despite having higher losses, despite it been 3 vs 1 at times FBI has followed a set strategy of smashing portals out of our core before preforming joint strikes into the enemy core.

I mean 3 families against 1 family, and were still spanking you around the galaxy, really its embarrassing.

However when you reach this kind of level you do become use to the plebs rising up on occasion, its a burden of been a hero, the sacrifice you make by been a true lion and not some cackling vulture tuna fish whining on like a women.

Really it doesn't effect us, were use to hearing women moan, like always however a swift back hand and a strong foot forward and the plebs are shaken to the core, shaken like little school girls hiding behind a morale system.   

Like a school of scared fish they have scattered in every direction, like a school of wet special needs tuna they are going to run away in defeat, probably a good job as we would dominate next round as well, not like their is anyone stopping us.

Well like stated were use to the plebs rising up, and in this case like many before its just taken the right amount of....

Pimp Slap!!!!

Hallucinogen UK
IC Avatars: https://plus.google.com/u/0/110909766643431141895/posts
Reality Grid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP7jnaRti4A
The Order Psychogenica

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 109

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Lol just so you know, for 90% of that 67 had 2 attackers. One was on vacation most the time, our fourth was out the fam less than a week before 72 happened. You basically were up against Pitt and Eddie, who was a converted ressie lol oh and a bad ass pax tongue y'all did pretty good with the odds you faced, I'll give you that

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

15 Reply by RareUK (edited by RareUK 02-Feb-2016 18:10:43)

  • RareUK
  • RareUK
  • Imperial Activist
  • Offline
  • Posts: 569
  • Tag points: 29

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Starburst:

The Replicators (#1966) took a planet off Pitbull (#1967).
1    StarGate (1966) [14,6]    1792    61291571    148332
1    The Azgard    Camaar    150    28861276

Its a strong final message, I like it....

Hallucinogen UK
IC Avatars: https://plus.google.com/u/0/110909766643431141895/posts
Reality Grid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP7jnaRti4A
The Order Psychogenica

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,724
  • Tag points: 5

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Lone Tiger wrote:

66 is winning.    If no one attacks them, then they win the game.  So how can they cry "poor us, we've been hit, please don't attack us."

How can it be wrong to attack the winning family at the end of round?

I suspect this is just one person in family 66.  But if family 66 truly wants to win that way, then message me and I'll let that happen.


The honor code needs to be changed.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Big1
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 456

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Look in the mirror that is where the honor is.Just like in RL

RICKING

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366
  • Tag points: 6

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

Best thing about ic now is next round you can get your own back or land in a fam together and move on

http://www.ic-wiki.com/index.php?title= … rsmostopen

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,611
  • Tag points: 19

Re: The Azgard 1966; bad loser.

I think Ricking just summed it all up in a few words

~ Cloud

"I Cannot Awake From This Nightmare As Long As You Exist..."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points