That's all well and good but the morale system blows and is only sinking this ship faster.

I stayed small on purpose, and Colo jumped fleet to 3x my size. We were even on planets...

Morale system is definitely flawed. No way in hell my attacks should cost me 14% morale every hit, and he can just eat my bankers up by 20 attacks to my 7 retakes. That's a -13 attack differential, which is ludicrous.

Also, the morale difference between a 200k nw player and a 76k networth player should NOT be 92% per attack. That is also insanity.

I understand the reasoning behind the change, and it's a good move in the right direction but it definitely needs more work. Tie morale loss to Attack bonus or something. Limiting attacks by morale in a CONFLICT game is the opposite of what we want to do.

why keep punnishing the active bankers exceed, it would be better to give people with no attack bonus that morale discount so they can do retakes, that way the attacker can focus on the real targets. if u would give attackers less morale loss, they only can rape other bankers more without them being able to defend themselves.

the morale rules r better just not properly fine tuned atm. small attackers are extremely powerfull with these rules they can explore 8 a day and the whole fam is out of morale.

Say what Michael? xD

@ Nightwish

It's not country music what I am hearing. But seeing the moral % players are posting here and knowing the % I see.. the current moral formula definitely needs more tweaking.

i didnt say bankers need better attack bonus, the attack bonus and races r fine as they are.
a banker with unlimited morale stil wouldnt be able to break an attackers portal so it wouldnt hurt to lower morale costs for bankers however they would be able to do the retakes needed to keep their core clear.

Clearly people dont know morale is based off a families nw when attacking and a familes size when opping...........

uhm, you forgetting your own NW ?
and size for opping ?
please tell me where this is stated in the forum ?
seems you know something more then us, or maybe you just know nothing

Diplomacy +1, just sayin.

because "it's shit" doesn't provide much to work off of? (mostly this)
because personally I disagree and am yet to hear an opinion that isn't based off of lack of adaptation?
because part of the point was to put big families at a disadvantage?

morale was allrdy an issue cuz of colo being 20 size. and their small attacker less then 100k nw.
15% more or less nw of the total fam is neglectable in such case. (colo had 1/4 of their fams nw on himself all fleet/rc yet still costed me 20 morale per retake simply cuz i had 6 times his planet ammount amd same nw)

and ofcourse people cannot give anny usefull imformation then 'this morale system sucks', since we cant see the frikkin morale formula.

Well as being in the number 1 fam nw wise the last 2 rounds it makes me never want to have a pop banker in my fam so i think this will slowly kill the pop banker out of the game. I really have no idea how to fix the problem, i know last round my fam 1686 did no farming we warred the second place families 3 times. I think people need to be more honorable in this game last round the second to last place family farmed a family for atleast 500 to 600 planets getting them a second place finish so we saw the morale system not work that way cause i know rev and buds family tried to war them but being second in nw could only do a couple attacks to thier attackers. We need to find a balance or we need to go back to the old way cause only being able to do a couple attacks to an attacker really makes me never want to attack again

your welcome!