it enabled people in SN to stay low and load up with wizzies and opp people 20 times.

As long as you build half decent op defense this isn't an issue

So far from what I've seen, heard, and done myself the issue with morale for ops is more in people trying to play the same way they did before this was implemented, and not necessarily a lack of balance in the change itself. 

If you're a big banker or resourcer, you're going to have trouble effectively casting cpffs on mid-small attackers for your attackers, and the traditional "hey guys retake everything you can" role during wars for these players is less of an option (it was boring as hell anyway)...but you can be very effective at casting ops and/or helping with raids against an opposing families top bankers/poppers. 

I definitely can think of a few tweaks that could be made, but in a lot of cases it's going to require adaptation from players...and since trying to change up the game a bit was kind of the point I don't see this as a bad thing.

I feel like I'm in the dark in regards to agent/wiz nw ratio success rates on spells/ops. This information seems to be unavailable and should be.

Not a fan of morale for ops, I was getting attacked by one guy and opped by another and could only return the favor to one of them.

Well in SN I believe the morale ratio constitutes morale constraints to both the family and the empire. But in SB your multiplayer families are there. This should be vice versa. If your apart of a family then it should cost more for opping the smaller family not the smaller player. As wise. If your in a single player gal that is practically hard core (atm) then you should just leave the morale constraints alone, that is because family/player empire are one and same! So it makes.no sense.
Also opping in single man galaxy rocks when your op larger opponents who want to bully you...

Seriously, blocking 1 portal and doing 1 infiltrate on another person took me down to 6 morale?

for 1 opps mostly lose 65% morale so its not working

Morale Cost: 70 for 1 opp

Supernova is a training galaxy. That might help you a bit there.

Haha yeah I was trying to get a foothold in that area :-)

I only had about 880 lasers on it

I really dislike the change.  Being unsure of how the costs are computed I can't give a good analysis about that, but I'll say they seem much too high in general.  It makes no sense IMO to further constrain morale like this.  There is an illusion of having to 'balance' your ops and attacks now.  I'd argue that in general you've just eliminated the possibility of certain roles doing any ops at all (attackers, large bankers) because it's no longer worth the morale cost to ever use them.  But hey, now we can justify a small dedicated op player that does nothing the whole round but stay small and do ops...!

I would implement a hard cap for different level of ops. Worse ops (that cause damage to a player in some way) would have a higher max morale cap such as 50 morale loss even to the widest of nw/size margins. Information ops would have a hard cap of 10-20 morale. That way you can keep tabs on some small son of a bitch trying to core you before you waste 100 morale removing him. If he's not porting, he's not a threat yet and can better time your removal of him before he ports.

Also, since morale is tied to ops AND attacking, remove the 5 morale planet limit bonus per player. 1 player won't be stocked up on these now that moral planets would benefit all players in a family and not just attackers.