Re: I for one do not welcome global cooling
For those that don't understand the term Cycle, and how it relates to this arguement. #'s 1 and 2 in the meaning.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cycle
In this regards, either the cycle of heating and cooling. So means years of heating...then so meany years of cooling...then so many years of heating again. This...is a cycle event.
Since the ice age, earth has been warming up. But it was warming up over thousands upon thousands of years, until the glaciers receded. Chances were in time we might have had those glaciers again moving forward. Maybe in tens of thousands of more years in the future. We couldn't know that unless we recorded that data. Since late 1800's and the early 1900's, world wide, we have been collecting tempature information. We've collected data for nearly 100+ years.
Now the charts presented have shown a graduate and quick increase of temperature for those 100+ years. Until a "cycle" occurs, that means DATA showing 100 years of global cooling, you should expect the heat to keep INCREASING, until wholly proven otherwise.
My arguement is, that temperature will continue to increase, due to man made emissions. The chart I showed, linked the industrial revolution, and then the start of Mass Production in the mid 1940's as a steady increase in temperatures world wide. My theory has a basis. But it's not just my theory, it's a scientific theory. When your calling me an idiot, your calling thousands of scientists WORLD WIDE idiots also.
Now, to disprove that theory, you would have to have an equal amount of years, of steady cooling of world wide tempature, to show that it's a natural occuring phenomina, where human interferance would then be negligable.
You sure don't act like your name sake Spock. I've proven my theory and arguement in a logical manner. The only thing you've attempted to do was try to piss people off in order to get them banned from the forums. The only person that is Trolling right now, is you.
