Re: 10275 vs 10269

Yeah it was funny as hell, you got the best vintage whine out for it. smile

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

27 (edited by homestead 21-Jan-2014 06:08:11)

Re: 10275 vs 10269

from a pw never was- rich
but then again we all were nevers and at times we were great !

Re: 10275 vs 10269

What? lol

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: 10275 vs 10269

Yeah, what are you talking about? Forever was never a great!

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

Re: 10275 vs 10269

I was saying he did have 1 great moment when he captured a goat, a icd, and his iud

Re: 10275 vs 10269

lol got burnt, can't handle, unintelligible.

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: 10275 vs 10269

^
Lol.:D

I used to be highly active imperial conflict player, but then i took an arrow in the knee.

HW/ Raiden HW/ HUU/ Blitzen/ Lotus Blossom HW

Re: 10275 vs 10269

Seems like you guys are having fun?

Re: 10275 vs 10269

btw Homestead i think you post.......: I guess breach of contract it is- plus he is right he stole the advertising name and some rights
a bit childish smile whahahahha

35 (edited by MajorError 22-Jan-2014 13:37:38)

Re: 10275 vs 10269

W33dkillers wrote:

Blue Fluffy Unicorn deserted the Program and joined a spinoff

We have been left with no alternative then to War for Breach of Contract


LOL Warchild send me his VIP invite but it didnt work, so yeah I was suppose to be in your family.. Im glad I didnt get stuck with Homestead.


And this war is really silly and doesnt have any honor.

First 267 declared war on us and just moments later 275 declared war on us.... how very honorable to attack a smaller family with 2 inactive attackers with 2 larger families..... You must feel really proud of it.

Re: 10275 vs 10269

Well i like to be in the top ranking.. but i rather finish last fighting with proud, then some sneaky, not real honorable wars and demands!

ps. good to have you in our fam MajorError

Re: 10275 vs 10269

Yeah saw it a mile away. smile

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: 10275 vs 10269

MajorError wrote:

And this war is really silly and doesnt have any honor.

First 267 declared war on us and just moments later 275 declared war on us.... how very honorable to attack a smaller family with 2 inactive attackers with 2 larger families..... You must feel really proud of it.



lol'd lol

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: 10275 vs 10269

we only thought it would last like a day  before EOR so jus ta bit of fun

We where going to cancel on Unexplored after but the Phattys 266 canceled on just about everyone


and at no point have we taken more then 15% of any family's planets this round  and i doubt we would even get 10% of yours

hell most the round we been a 3 person family unfortunately due to various IRL reasons most the original players have left


More to give attackers something to do just before EOR  as we couldn't jump to win nw or size


Still gl this and next round

Re: 10275 vs 10269

Ah k, as long as one fam has fun!

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

41 (edited by W33dkillers 23-Jan-2014 01:26:37)

Re: 10275 vs 10269

yes in a war game it is shocking to attack even for a day

When we got hit for over 50% of our planets by ICD fam see if you can find one msg of complaint on these forums

reduced to 3 people and recovered thanks to randoms who joined.   its a game of war  win some lose some

I played the old days and back then 20% was counted not to bad result from a war and pretty fair  (266 v 268 was more like 40-45% loss)


not knowing you where in a war in a war that i cant see in uni news the difference in fams wasn't that big

5    The Fluffy Unicorns (10275) [77,49]     692     13856751     40688   
7    IM FEELING BLUE (10269) [12,15]     568     10665821     47314 


as you can see from the current NW and planet loss we have really farmed you guys into the ground  as well as opped you to destruction

IM FEELING BLUE (10269) [12,15]     550     12890307     50645

Re: 10275 vs 10269

lol winning!

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: 10275 vs 10269

Fleet Admiral    homestead    alaskan knights    7916229    101    Online!

Were you expecting a fight? lol

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: 10275 vs 10269

id assume he expected a fight  turns out you didn't have the resources to fight

Re: 10275 vs 10269

Quantam Banking sucks sad

46

Re: 10275 vs 10269

Looping wrote:

Quantam Banking sucks sad

quantum banking is great, as soon as you're raided your ekon researzh gets boosted the way you're doing almost the same inkome.  It also has a good pop growth so u rekover faster from spells.  And your ground defense is way better bekause you have the ability to build droids.

Just learn how to use it and you'll have a lot of fun

Re: 10275 vs 10269

your research bonus will go up after a raid no matter what race you choose.
you have 30% loss in income bonus compared to revalon. Don't think that the +40% in research can make that up. Though the droids are nice and give you 20% more defense and no food consumption you could have used that iron for buildings. And when you go CF banking the pop growth rate is not that important.

48

Re: 10275 vs 10269

Looping wrote:

your research bonus will go up after a raid no matter what race you choose.

With quantum goes up more than 2* a revalon, bekause you kollekt more than 2* researzh points.


Looping wrote:

you have 30% loss in income bonus compared to revalon. Don't think that the +40% in research can make that up.

Wrong, 1 week into the round your inkome bonus is equal to a revalon by only setting your szienze 60/40 inkome/konstruktion.


Looping wrote:

Though the droids are nice and give you 20% more defense and no food consumption you could have used that iron for buildings. And when you go CF banking the pop growth rate is not that important.

Any banker needs a lot of iron, but the konstruktion bonus of a quantum gives you enuf leftovers to build a dezent defensive fleet of droids. Also, a quantum doesnt need to be fat to be doing a good inkome, is not rekommendabl bekause it affekts your bonus, so your konst bonus balanzes your OB kosts and when you're done with infra just set it all to ekonomy.


The problem is that you're using a quantum like it was a revalon, and that's wrong.  Most players pik revalon for banking just bekause they are lazy, a quantum banking requires way more dedikation, but the outputs are worth the ezperienze.
I wouldnt rekommend a quantum as a main banker tho (due to bonus), just a medium sized one, and the inkome obtained is proportionally bigger than the fat revalon, meaning with half the planets a quantum makes more than half the rev inkome.

People who has banked with quantum the right way kan ezplain this better to you  smile

Re: 10275 vs 10269

We didnt have a single dedicated banker so we struggled all round, then of our attackers dissapeared and we basically had 1 attacker and 3 rescourse guys. 
Plus I was too far away from both families to do any damage.

All in all I had fun, it was my first time as an attacker and learned allot.

Re: 10275 vs 10269

good time to learn  and you actually learn more in mid size wars as you dont have 9bn GC to make super fleets