Key wrote:You read it right here ladies and genlemen.
First sign of confusion: You think you've found proof of evidence of something? I wonder what. Let's read on!
Key wrote:The denouncer of the health care exchange has told someone that they could and probably should enter the exchange to look for better health care.
Could you quote where he said they "probably should"? He simply asked people to check what their rates are/would be if they signed up under Obamacare. This information lets us see whether prices are going up or down. They're obviously going up. Einstein knows that most people's rates have gone up. Einstein knows that people providing this information is evidence that the ACA is hurting people.
Key wrote:Doesn't state he should get better, just look for better.
More evidence that you missed the purpose of this thread in its entirety.
Key wrote:Damn, I guess the exchange is doing what it's supposed to be doing, by helping show ALTERNATIVES!
That's what the bill is supposed to do? The bill's purpose is to show alternatives? Because people didn't know there is more than one health insurance company in the USA? The government has to run a huge portion of our economy so that people know they can shop around?
Like I said, the notion that this bill was necessary for people to shop around, which is what you're arguing here, is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. You're obviously very confused.
[I wish I could obey forum rules]