I don't think so.

Of course you have your very own twisted view but most of the rest of the world would rather agree to the definition in the wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberals
Read it, should be interesting. After all it is the political foundation of the US.

I guess, most in the world would rather think of liberalism as THE ideology that made people look to the US as a role model... despite all the military invasions and the kind of capitalism US-world domination came along with.

Obviously I write in the past tense because since 2001 the insane and pathological tendencies within the US have gotten the upperhand and politically the US has become a weird isolated isle nobody really understands anymore. In the first years everybody was "understanding" due to the collapse of a few buidlings and several thousand deaths in your country but after a while...

They are strongly pro-big business, they are strongly for monopolies.

I am correct in all of this, this describes, in general, all American Liberals

don't worry, they'll wreck it and demand another bailout soon enough

wreck them!

Big companies didn't go bankrupt.  They got a bailout.  The little companies went bankrupt, and those are gone.  Look down mainstreet, Any City, USA.

Wall Street is NOT main street, so don't confuse the two.  Although some articles from speculators showed how sad they were to see their favorite coffee shops shutter their doors after years of operation....go figure.  Now you got the money, but now you don't have your favorite coffee shop to spend that money.

@key
"Big companies didn't go bankrupt.  They got a bailout.  "
I think you misinterpreted what I wrote. I was referring to the bailouts when some large companies, normally, would have gone bankrupt. That is why I complain about monopolies and decreasing competition.

Big corporations. What about McDonald's, your favourite? Did Obama steal your fatburgers?

Kodak didn't manuever themselves into the digital age to well.  They were still doing the old processing routine.  And many shops/stores have moved to digital photocopying over old chemical style.  That's Kodaks problem.  Kodak could have asked for a proper business loan with any national bank.

And yes I did read the above first statement, where he blames all of societies ills on "American liberals".  I differ on opinion on whose to blame.  I blame big corporations and banks, and Einstein blames American Liberals.

Yes, because Border's is definitely a company that kept entirely up to date with technology. 

Ford zagged, gm nd chrysler zigged.

Letting them enter bankruptcy and possibly being sold to pay off creditors would have been better.

"Yes, because Border's is definitely a company that kept entirely up to date with technology."
None of the saved companies are. Exactly why they shouldn't be saved. It puts pressure on the management and that is exactly what is needed to make them perform better. Einstein makes a good point there.

I tell you what.  The person they put in charge of our entire corporation, has no viable job skills in the Home Building sector.  He's never sold a 2x4 piece of lumber.  Caulking.  Sink.  Tile.  Bags of cement.  Nothing.

What he HAS done, was go in, gut companies to the bone, and then sell those companies.

And that is his only "leadership" skill.  He has no knowledge of actually running a lumberyard, let alone a national chain of lumber stores and home building service centers.

Was this a proper choice for leadership of our company?  Probably not.  But some damn idiot figured he would save us money, by cutting the number of employees, and shutting down many stores seen as "low profit".  Not, "Non-profit", but "Low profit".

Whether or corporation survives under this type of sales banner, remains to be seen, even after 4 years of crap home sales, and crap home building years.  I already stated it would take up to ten years for a rebound in the home building market.  Why?  Because we still have tens of thousands of empty homes, unbuilt homes languishing under bank servitorship, and foreclosed homes which have yet to find a single family. 

However, WALL STREET shows that home pricing in certain sectors are rising, which is good for the market!...Good for who?  The only people who own those homes are either Real Estate agencies, or the banks themselves.  And they have NOT been upkeeping those homes, or properly securing them.  In essence, you have delinquent, falling apart pieces of crap that isn't worth the asking price of rising home costs.

I'd blame the banks on the foreclosures.  I'd blame Wall Street for their speculative bullshit.

But Einstein, would blame the liberals.

My mom lost her home to foreclosure.  I blame Einstein, personally more now, than the bank.  Why?  For his gross posturing that the blame falls on an ideal, rather than the person who signed off on the order of the foreclosure.