1 (edited by {Black Mafia} IC Death 14-Nov-2013 23:48:57)

Topic: 10067 vs 10070

Our relations with 10070 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 48 weeks.


Yup.. GL to Both Sides!!

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

2 (edited by Devilz 14-Nov-2013 23:52:20)

Re: 10067 vs 10070

Boooooooo!!!!!!!!!!

Re: 10067 vs 10070

No one wants to challenge you Devilz =P too scary!

Re: 10067 vs 10070

Good luck too both sides.

In peace we train for war, in war we fight for peace.

Re: 10067 vs 10070

Thanks and good luck all big_smile

Re: 10067 vs 10070

At last something, to talk about, this round...such a boring round

what is in a name if its not a respected one
so play with honor and they will remember your name with respect and if u dont [taste the rainbow]

Re: 10067 vs 10070

it stays boring.. hell even this seems dead but i guess the chatter will come once the war starts

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: 10067 vs 10070

3 ticks til war starts GL guys.. Savings seems to be about fair

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: 10067 vs 10070

Whats your savings at IC Death?

Re: 10067 vs 10070

Ooooooo something fun for once in this round.

In peace we train for war, in war we fight for peace.

Re: 10067 vs 10070

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzekrcVe04Q

Its prime time
Fight Night
Pay Per View
Suicide
The Bee Sting Butterfly

Re: 10067 vs 10070

good luck to 10070 lets have a fun war.

If your not first your last

Re: 10067 vs 10070

nice UK u jumped alot of ground.. u must not plan on fighting me huh..

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: 10067 vs 10070

nice atm.. UK is sitting huge with alot of figs.. attackin bankers and stuff.. they put everything into 1 attacker.. nice move but wont last long..

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: 10067 vs 10070

No I will fight you but you also did a good jump kind of counter act each other.

Shame about other attackers been off line.

Still for a very short time (until I mess up / make a mistake / or die) I shall gloat


Rank     Empire     Race     Planets     Networth
1     WarChild UK     WarChild     115     7466529
2     Cyrax     Revalons     360     5664404
3     Arkady Ourumov     Camaar     105     5239723
4     Liu Kang     Revalons     406     4814566
5     Xenia Onatopp     Revalons     325     3834437

big_smile

Re: 10067 vs 10070

{Black Mafia} IC Death wrote:

nice atm.. UK is sitting huge with alot of figs.. attackin bankers and stuff.. they put everything into 1 attacker.. nice move but wont last long..


We didn't put all our money into one attacker.

As it happens my Con Bonus was like 83% when I jumped

Re: 10067 vs 10070

lol

kick his ass sebass!

Re: 10067 vs 10070

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
75 planet(s) captured by Arkady Ourumov (100 %) (3 retakes).
56 planet(s) captured by Natalya Simonova (100 %).
1 planet(s) captured by Dimitri Mishkin (100 %).
-------------------
132 from #10070
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 132 times. 1 families and 130 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 123 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 7.


---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
16 planet(s) lost by Xenia Onatopp
13 planet(s) lost by Natalya Simonova
-------------------
29 to #10070
-------------------
We have been beaten 29 times. 1 families and 29 planets involved.
We actually lost 26 planet(s) in total. At least we were able to retake 3.


i didnt mean they put everything into u.. just saying u didnt leave ur fam with much half my fam could raid ur bankers and ressies and stuff.. like its no defense at all some of them dont even have 25k ground..

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: 10067 vs 10070

Well it would make no difference anyway as sadly both our other attackers did not jump and logged off when the war started, had the money to jump them, in fact we had MORE than I spent on myself.   Like stated my Con was 83% so price for me was minimal, we had more then enough to jump attackers but they didn't jump and logged off, others probably went agent heavy

Re: 10067 vs 10070

smile
then the coordonation stinks sad

Taranul de oras, cel mai prost animal !
Idiots are ruin the country !

Re: 10067 vs 10070

Hay Ho  no activity and lose


Still I shall continue to enjoy  the party im at


Taken you a while to kill an inactive fam


Sad thing for the game is we made it to 2nd at all

Re: 10067 vs 10070

Weed big_smile
well you guys are good that is why you are 2nd, too bad that activity is not present sad

Taranul de oras, cel mai prost animal !
Idiots are ruin the country !

23 (edited by {Black Mafia} IC Death 17-Nov-2013 10:54:30)

Re: 10067 vs 10070

i dunno i think u guys were nothing but infra.. alot of u guys had no fleet or anything i cant imagine how much stuff we have destoryed.. crazy thing is u guys had all that eco and no coordination when it came to attacking

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

24 (edited by RareUK 17-Nov-2013 11:36:30)

Re: 10067 vs 10070

Hehehe.

In true 70: Style our lead banker Talkie goes to a party last night and me WarChild went on a date tongue unlike our other attackers however I was back and ready for the war.    Hope the party was OK Talkie sounded fun when I called. 

But hey Talkie we have done really well brother big_smile we have gone up against people who have been playing this game years and in our first round back we have hit first rank and been top 3 nearly all round big_smile and remember we always said this is just a test run for next round.    In fact since been back we have already met some great players, some friendly people (some that remember us, others than don't) but have met some nice people and crossed blades with some good players so we have won a victory even if not a direct one.

We have already ironed out a lot of mistakes, already have a theme set for next round, already have players asking to join up and more active more aggressive ones at that.    To say we started this round with hopes of been top 10 I think we have worked wonders and think a few others would agree despite our lack of active attackers, in fact out of our attackers I think I'm the only one who has even passed a planet to a banker, sadly I could not expo you all, but I tried at least.

Give me two half active attackers stud either side of me and this war could have gone very different and they know that and so do we, so that alone is some small victory, at least some of us didn't back down big_smile


I would like the galaxy to know that we DID have the money and the rezzies to jump our other attackers, one of them alone was sent 135 million GC (that is not a small jump) instead they sent most back logged off and have not been back since the war began.   I have led this round on science for about a week my Con Bonus I am guessing was the best in the galaxy for me to jump cost very little so sure we had more than enough to jump other attackers, but they bailed out.

25 (edited by RareUK 17-Nov-2013 11:54:21)

Re: 10067 vs 10070

RareUK wrote:

so sure we had more than enough to jump other attackers, but they bailed out.



I hope that is understood, we would have had forces if people jumped and did not log off sad

I feel just as bad about it as anyone because it could have been a fun fight at least


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfMrLTbog0o