So it has been proved the current 40% is unfair in some cases. Like the previous 35%, is ok for the early days of a round, but as the round advances the gaps between families grow, and you see cases of a family at 400k nw allowed to attack a family at 170k nw, and then even more unfair cases, like a family at 4m nw allowed to attack a family at 1.7m nw.  As the gap grows, the chances for the small fam decrease proportionally to the stage of the round.

My idea is to keep it at 40% plus a penalty based on a new concept called AGN (Average Galazy Networth)

AGN = (Summatory of ALL families NW) div (number of families).

To calculate the penalty for big gaps you have to find out what % of the AGN is any fam involved and then add a 10% of the difference to the original 40% range.

I show it with an ezample, for a stage in a round of 10 families like this:

famA  ---> 450k NW
famB  ---> 400k NW
famC  ---> 320k NW
famD  ---> 190k NW
famE  ---> 100k NW
famF  ---> 82k NW
famG  ---> 80k NW
famH  ---> 44k NW
famI  ---> 33k NW
famJ  ---> 26k NW

Total Gal NW = 1725000
AGN = 172500

With the 40%NW rule famA is allowed to attack famD  (limit at 180k).  But as proven famD has no real chances of beating famA.  Let's calculate the penalty:

1st we get the NW gap = 450k - 190k = 260k

2nd we find out what % of the AGN represents that gap  ---->  AvG (Average Gap) = (gap*100) div AGN

     AvG = 26000000 div 172500 = 150.72%

3rd we get 10% of AvG and use it as penalty to modify the attacking range  ----> 10%AvG = 15

4th New attacking range = 40% + 15% = 55%

So the modified range for famA to attack famD is now 55%  (limit at 247k). They arent allowed to attack.

==============================