I think you screwed up the title slightly...

well if you guys hadn't botched his holinesses plans the second time around, he would never have had to send Micheal down to talk to Mohammed. So blame yourselves.

The youngest mother, whose child survived, was a 5 year old Peruvian girl called Medina who gave birth in the '30s. Her son died in 1979.

Now THAT is trivia.

Also, Einstein, you spout so much shit while sounding so authoritative about it. You should be a politician.

(If you don't believe this, google "youngest mother", there is a snopes article which cites sources)

Fair enough.

Would you have an issue if, hypothetically, a teenager married (presumably against his will) an infant, and they didn't consumate the marriage until both were of legal age? It sounds like a messed up situation, but what with arranged marriages and everything, it might not be impossible...

Personally, I'm more against the whole system of arranged marriages than the underage marriage part.

Edit: To clarify, underage marriage that isn't consumated until both are of legal age.

time for me to move to an islamic country where do you guys suggest? preferably somewhere with hot girls.

He directly quotes from the Koran and talks about Mohamed but you dont even try do you?

I am sure you can find passages in the bible to support marrying young.. .they did all through the middle ages after all... and consumated as soon as the girl had her first period...

Islam in general frowns upon things like this. Muhammad might have had brides that young, I'm not sure about that, but that doesn't mean Islam allows it. There are the "laws" of the Righteous Kaliphs as well (and the later kaliphs, although they're not considered flawless and thus their laws can be disputed)...

If you dig in our own christian past, you'll find horrible things like that too..

"I am sure you can find passages in the bible to support marrying young.. .they did all through the middle ages after all... and consumated as soon as the girl had her first period..."

Err, no.. Not at all.. YOu might find such things in the bible, but it's not in the slightless "medieval". It was written in the "byzantian" area (however that empire will only really exists 300 years later) and before the middle ages start. So it's the late roman time, and not in the area where the term "medieval" is intended for.
But to come to my point: In medieval times (apart from the early medieval times [476 - 9th century] where we can't be certain) marriages were rather late. People wed usually around there 25th birthday, woth men and women. This tendency only ended in the 19th century when the industrial revolution really started to kick in..

I got this from "Vrijen en trouwen : van de Middeleeuwen tot heden : seks, liefde en huwelijk in historisch perspectief" by Chris Vandenbroeke (I'm not sure if it's translated into other languages though)

OMG ROFL!!

i just saw the video, saw it on my laptop. I was about to stop watching it after the first year old thing, but thought i'd have a bit more fun

i'm guna quote now "There is no minimal age for entering marriage...you can have a marriage contract even with a 1 year old"

do you understand what that means einstien?? that means he's saying The Quran does not state a minimal age for marrying, niether does the Bible, Torah or any other book or scripture for any other religion, he is just saying logically since there is no minimal age you can even get married to a girl that's 1 year old

He goes on to say, the right time to have sex with your wife is according to your culture, your tradition, or the culture around you,

he then continues on to explain some cultures that allow young marriages and some forbid it with laws,

he then says the example is from Prophet Mohammad, now back then the culture was different, today it is not similar to what it was back then, this judge? has already stated the right time to marry and to have sex is according to your culture and the environment you live in, he's basically saying there is not minimal age or minimal age to have sex stated in The Quran so logically you can be married when ever you want, that's logically, this is the same with The Bible and The Torah, now yes this guy is too much to the book for my liking, but he's a judge of some sort, he has to be...

and then they even say in the end the other gives and example and asks if it's a LOGICAL marriage, not moral...LOGIC

i don't find anything wrong with this, you've just put a spin on words there, next time read more carefully

and he did not anywhere provide a quote from The Quran, einstien

"This guy is a Saudi Marriage Official"

that's from your first post, and respond to the rest, please i really wanna hear a response for that

gladiator

friend, think about the consequences what you are saying... "marriage contracts" with 1 year old girls (or whatever their age, since he is talking about FORCED marriage) = bondage...

the other implication is that if you live in a society that does not actually prohibit sex with underaged youths then they are fair game whatever their age

if you honestly think there nothing wrong with either of that then that's pretty sick

Indeed Gladiator.