CNN is already asking if any patriot groups were active today. (It's Patriots' Day in MA, nationally on the 19th)

DHS has been declaring Christians and liberty-lovers as the biggest terror threat for years. You took the bait.

The notion that people need to capture nations to set off bombs is laughable. The notion that you can stop domestic bombings with martial law, let alone foreign wars, is laughable.

You're a globalist sheep. You're a pawn of authoritarians. You'll believe literally anything authority figures tell you, even when it's admitted they've launched many false flag operations in the past. You truly believe in the admitted lie.

Whoever bombed Boston today, attempts are already being made to blame it on patriots, and you'll believe literally any nonsense you're told. Wow you're gullible.

You're the equivalent of a Palestinian burning an American flag, which he was given by his authoritarian masters. You always take the bait. You're easy to use.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/t … 0RQfVsH1yI

apparently there was a 3rd bomb at a library and police say they have a suspect. I wonder what the last name is.

Kemp as far as I am concered your a lying sociopath,

1) I will never accept a TSA checkpoint in a mall

2) I will never accept a pat down for a movie

3) I will pledge to vote to continue fighting over-sea's as a way to stop terrorists from coming in

4) I know what Agenda 21 is and I will fight it

Can you quit trying to slander me?

Or can we both fly to a nation that allows duels cause I want to kill you before I tolerate anymore falsehoods from your mouth.

...

Aaaaand you're definitely getting a warning, Flint.  X(

When I have more than 10 seconds to read. 

Spock is just spewing so we don't remember his shrieking that there was no terror threat in America, that there were LITERALLY no terror attacks in USA.

Too bad Spock.  It's a matter of record here.

The Yell, false flags are a matter of history. Unless you've got evidence that some evil terrorist who could have been stopped with more hands in kids' pants bombed Boston, this is hardly inconsistent with my position that you're a bunch of sheep who will buy into every false flag offered to you despite the admissions that this stuff has been staged frequently in recent history.

Bomb drills went on earlier in Boston today, which is typical for false flag events. It's an excuse for police inaction (many think it's just a drill initially), and a cover if the actual bombers are caught.

Your ignorance of recent history and our government's willingness to kill Americans for more power is not an argument for your position of absolute terror.

Obama stated prematurely that America needs a national security force as well funded as the military. What do you know, he's giving you excuses to surrender more rights to government. And, as always, you take the bait.

You don't care that the US government has a history of funding and training terrorists who later bomb us, blaming Muslim extremism for the terrorists they created. You don't care that the rights we lose in response to bombings like this don't prevent bombings like this.

You're a terrified child ignorant of what's going on in the world, ignorant of what anyone you don't know thinks or why. You're comforted by authoritarian government telling you it'll take care of you. You're a good slave.

You trust the same government that gave Mexican drug cartels guns via Fast & Furious to protect you!

Saudis committed 9/11 too. Where do you want to invade this time? Doesn't look like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria have been enough.

Why are you avoiding my question? We already invaded Iraq and Afghanistan and funded/armed Al Qaeda in Libya and are are funding/arming them in Syria now.

You argued these wars and invasions were to protect us. So where now? We clearly need to invade more nations across the globe to stop bombings at home. That's your argument. So where next?

Every Kemp post is a slur against Kemp.  I know this because he says so when I quote him.

I accuse Kemp of denying that Al Qaeda is a threat and claiming there is no war on terror.  Now it would be political suicide to say so, so, he will not say so.  He will just complain that I don't prove that this wasn't organized by the US government. 

He will claim he never said it was; just that I can't prove the opposite so I am "trapped" in my slave views.  He is "liberated" enough to raise arguments that slaves can't disprove.

The moon was created by fairies.  Can you disprove that? Do you still maintain it wasn't? Then you're a slave.  See how that works?  Them's deep thoughts.

Republicans: "Walk"
Democrats:  "Light rail"
Libertarians: "Unicycles with square wheels"

are you missin' the point yesterday was the National North Korean festivity ??

yea this kould be the false flag operation we were waiting, but ... Boston Marathon?? really? 

naaah I dont think it was an inside job (initially), must probably be some small faktion of Al Qaeda trying to show thay aint dead  (if Al Qaeda eksists at all)

I am still curious when Kemp turned into the ranting conspiracy nut...

Anyway, Flint I like the fact you immediately go to external terrorism as your bogeyman, unfortunately it does point to the brainwashing that Kemp was trying to pin on you, in between his ramblings... My thought is that the timing of the bombings point to internal terrorists; some sort of "freedom fighters" militia group who are fighting against the "fags and queers" or something like that... as stated by Arfeh said, Massachusetts legalised gay marriage, and the Boston marathon is an international event, perfect for the christian fundamentalists to prove a point to the "liberal" media and establishment. If it was external terrorists then I would have expected the bombs to go off at the same time-ish as the leaders crossed the finish line for maximum public exposure - not 3 hrs later.

That said, I did love the coverage I saw from Fox news with the so called journalists trying to get experts to say it was Al Qaeda or something like that, and the experts all doing there best not to say that whilst still answering the questions...